What's new

China’s Anti-Access Missile

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,187
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China
China’s Anti-Access Missile
By Harry Kazianis
November 18, 2011


China’s much discussed anti-ship missile, the DF-21D, is a dangerous weapon. It’s also at the heart of the People’s Liberation Army’s anti-access/access denial (A2/AD) strategy, aimed at denying an enemy surface fleet command of the high seas.

Fired from a mobile truck-mounted launcher into the atmosphere, with assistance from over-the-horizon radar, satellite tracking and possibly unmanned aerial vehicles, a warhead is delivered to its target at a speed greater than sound. Currently, the system utilizes a single warhead per missile. But could the system be expanded to fire multiple warheads from one missile – so-called “MIRV” capability, with two or even three warheads per missile? Its been done before.

Back in the 1970s, the Soviet Union developed an intermediate range ballistic missile to target NATO strategic and tactical forces, the SS-20. The missile system was mobile and could strike with three independently targeted warheads. The United States regarded the system as a grave strategic threat. NATO forces would have had only four to six minutes warning time after the missile was fired, prompting then-U.S. President Ronald Reagan to counter with the Pershing II intermediate range missile. Thankfully, both systems were decommissioned at the end of the Cold War as part of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) signed in December 1987. Now, both the SS-20 and the Pershing II sit quietly in the U.S. Smithsonian Air and Space museum.

Unfortunately for any potential adversary on the high seas, the Chinese weren’t signatories to the INF treaty. While the United States and Russia have stopped producing intermediate range ballistic weapons, the Chinese and various others have picked up the cause. Over the last decade, the Chinese have deployed various versions of the DF-21 with expanding ranges. Estimates vary on the range and technical capabilities of the system. Some in the Chinese press have speculated the missile could have a range of 2,700 kilometers. The U.S. military recently declared the system to have reached “initial operation capacity”.

Could the Chinese take their current DF-21D design and adapt it to a MIRV capability? This would be tough for a number of reasons. The system as designed hasn’t been fully field tested beyond the laboratory, where components have presumably been demoed in sections. The PLA would also need to either use a missile that has the capability to carry more mass when launching its cargo or decrease the weight by miniaturizing each warhead to accommodate the existing missile. If neither of these could be done, the system would need to use smaller, lighter warheads with a lower yield, which would limit its capabilities.

And there’s also the difference in missions between the SS-20 and the DF-21D. While the SS-20 was designed to attack NATO forces with nuclear weapons, the DF-21D’s mission is to attack moving ocean going surface vessels. If the SS-20’s warhead was off target, the blast of its nuclear payload would still cause tremendous damage. The DF-21D would need to overcome presumed U.S. or allied missile defense systems and strike its target with accuracy. A miss of just a few feet could cause a large wave in the Pacific, but not much else.

Technical challenges aside, though, China’s anti-ship missile technology presents challenges for any surface fleet in the Pacific, in any format. While there’s uncertainty over its possible scaling up to something greater, anyone looking for inspiration would just have to take a trip to the Smithsonian in Washington.

Harry Kazianis is assistant editor of The Diplomat.
 
that speed is crazy...

China is developing its own hypersonic anti-ship missile, the Dong Feng 21D. This isn’t a cruise missile but rather a ballistic missile launched toward space and arcing back to Earth. The DF-21D is capable of hurtling down at speeds of about Mach 10 and covering a range of 1,500 km.

Dubbed the “carrier killer,” it is believed this new weapon will be used against American aircraft carriers to destroy US naval supremacy in the western Pacific. It could also block America from operating in the Sea of Japan and from coming to the defense of Taiwan.
 
launched toward space and arcing back to Earth

a lot of space technology are being used on weapons
 
China Missiles of the People's Republic of China
Surface-to-
Surface
Ballistic Missiles

Intercontinental


DF-41
DF-31A
DF-31
DF-5A
DF-5
DF-4

Intermediate Range


DF-16
DF-3A
DF-3

Medium Range


DF-25
DF-21
DF-2A
DF-2

Short Range


M20
B-611
P-12
BP-12
BP-12A
Type 621
Type 631
DF-15 (M-9)
DF-11 (M-11)
DF-1

Submarine Launched


JL-2
JL-1

Anti-Ship


DF-21D[1]

Cruise Missiles

Long Range Land Attack


DH-2000
HN-2000
CJ-20
CJ-10
DH-10
CF-2
CF-1
HN-3
HN-2
HN-1

Short Range Land Attack


YJ-85 (C-805)[1]
YJ-12
YJ-22
YJ-7 (C-701)
C-703
YJ-62 (C-602)
KD-88
YJ-4
KD-63
YJ-63 (C-603)
YJ-2
YJ-1
C-611
XW-41

Anti-Ship Supersonic


DH-2000
HN-2000
YJ-91
YJ-83 (C-803)
FL-7
HY-3 (C-301)
FL-2 (C-101)
CJ-1
YJ-12
YJ-22
3M-80MBE/E Moskit (SS-N-22)
3M-54E/E1 Klub (SS-N-27)
C-302
C-303
YJ-2
YJ-1

Anti-Ship Subsonic


YJ-82 (C-802)
YJ-8 (C-801)
C-704
YJ-7 (C-701)
FL-10
C-703
YJ-62 (C-602)
TL-10
FL-8
TL-1
TL-2
TL-6
FL-9
SY-2
SY-1
HY-4 (C-401)
HY-2 (C-201)
HY-1
C-611
XW-41

Anti-Tank Missiles


LJ-7 · HJ-10
HJ-9
HJ-8
HJ-73
9K116 Bastion
J-202
J-201
265-I

Anti-Submarine


CY-1
CY-2
CY-3
CJ-1

Air-to-
Surface
Cruise Missiles

Long Range Land Attack


CJ-20
CJ-10
DH-10
HN-1
HN-2
HN-3
CF-2
CF-1

Short Range Land Attack


YJ-2
YJ-1
C-611
XW-41
YJ-22
YJ-12
BA-7
AKD-10
AR-1
YJ-85 (C-805)[1]
C-704KD
YJ-7 (C-701)
C-703
YJ-62 (C-602)
KD-88
KD-63
YJ-63 (C-603)
Kh-59
Kh-29
YJ-4
QW-1

Anti-Ship Supersonic


DH-2000
HN-2000
YJ-91
YJ-83 (C-803)
FL-7
HY-3 (C-301)
FL-2 (C-101)
CJ-1
YJ-12
YJ-22
3M-80MBE/E Moskit (SS-N-22)
3M-54E/E1 Klub (SS-N-27)
C-302
C-303
YJ-2
YJ-1

Anti-Ship Subsonic


YJ-82 (C-802)
YJ-8 (C-801)
C-704
YJ-7 (C-701)
FL-10
C-703
YJ-62 (C-602)
TL-10
FL-8
TL-1
TL-2
TL-6
FL-9
SY-2
SY-1
HY-4 (C-401)
HY-2 (C-201)
HY-1
C-611
XW-41
Kh-35

Anti-Radiation


FL-7
YJ-5 (HQ-61)
YJ-91
Kh-31P
YJ-12

Anti-Tank Missiles


LJ-7
HJ-10
HJ-9
HJ-8
HJ-73

Guided Bombs


GB-1
LS series
LT series
FT series
YZ-100 series
YZ-102 series
YZ-200 series
KAB-1500Kr
KAB-500Kr

Surface-to-
Air
Anti-Satellite Missile


SC-19
KT-1
KT-2
KT-III

Anti-Ballistic Missile SAMs


FJ
KT-1
KT-2
KT-III
HQ-18
S-300PMU-2
HQ-15
S-300PMU-1 (HQ-10)
HQ-9
KS-2
KS-1
HQ-12

Anti-Radiation SAMs


FT-2000

Long Range Area Defence SAMs


HQ-19
HQ-18
S-300PMU-2
HQ-15
S-300PMU-1 (HQ-10)
HQ-9
FD-2000
S-300PMU
S-300FM
HQ-12
KS-1
KS-2

Medium Range Area Defence SAMs


HQ-16 (Buk)
HQ-12
KS-2 · KS-1
HQ-2 (S-75)
LS-2 ADS
PL-12 SAM
LS-II ADS

Short Range Point Defence SAMs


HQ-17 (Tor)
HQ-7 (FM-80)
HQ-64
HQ-6
HQ-6D
LY-60
HQ-61
TY-90
DK-9
CQW-2
FLS-1
FLG-1
FLV-1
FL-2000(V)
SG-2 ADS
LS ADS
YT ADS
FB-6A
FL-3000N
HN-5C
TD-2000
TD-2000B

Man Portable SAMs


QW-18
QW-11
QW-4
QW-3
QW-2
QW-1
FN-6
FN-16
HN-5

Air-to-Air
Beyond Visual Range AAMs


PL-21
PL-12 (SD-10)
PL-10 (K/AKK-10)
PL-10
PL-11
PL-4

Within Visual Range AAMs


PL-10 (K/AKK-10
PL-10
PL-9
PL-8 (Python 3)
PL-7
PL-6
PL-5
PL-3
PL-2
K-5 (PL-1)
HJ-10
TY-90
QW-18
QW-11
QW-4
QW-3
QW-2
FN-6
FN-16
HN-5
 
Could the Chinese take their current DF-21D design and adapt it to a MIRV capability? This would be tough for a number of reasons. The system as designed hasn’t been fully field tested beyond the laboratory, where components have presumably been demoed in sections. The PLA would also need to either use a missile that has the capability to carry more mass when launching its cargo or decrease the weight by miniaturizing each warhead to accommodate the existing missile. If neither of these could be done, the system would need to use smaller, lighter warheads with a lower yield, which would limit its capabilities.
Looks like this paragraph is conveniently ignored.
 
not ignored,China is still working on many things,it is the speed the country's military development that surprised a lot.
 
Brahmos mach 2,5 to 2,8 , Tomahawk over Mach 1 , China anti-carrier missile DF-21D mach 10 :cheesy:
 
Brahmos mach 2,5 to 2,8 , Tomahawk over Mach 1 , China anti-carrier missile DF-21D mach 10 :cheesy:

There is nothing cheesy here. Tomhawk and brahmos is cruise missiles, while so called Chinese carrier killer is Ballistic missile which can navigated at terminal and pre terminal stage.

At terminal stage Ballistic missiles can achieve upto mach25. It's like free fall. The ballistic missiles follow parabolic path (with little changes). They are thrown high in sky at some angle and assumed that they will follow physics and fall at certain point.

While cruise missile is different thing. Its difficult to achieve mach 10 for them.
 
Do China’s missiles spell trouble for Asia?
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
by : Ricardo Saludo

“China has the most active land-based ballistic and cruise missile program in the world,” a 2009 Pentagon report claims.
Hardly surprising, since the world’s biggest nuclear arsenals, America’s and Russia’s several thousand warheads, are up for reduction to 1,550 each under their 2010 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), which took effect in February this year.

Meanwhile, China has to more than double its nukes just to reach one-third of the agreed US and Russian stockpiles. It has about 240 warheads, with 175 in active mode and 65 in reserve, according to Western estimates cited in The Japan Times.

The Nuclear Threat Initiative lists China’s possible targets with its current ballistic missiles: short-range for areas along the border including Taiwan; medium-range for nearby countries like Japan, India, and Southeast Asian nations; intermediate-range for targets in Central Asia and the Western Pacific (where Russia and America have land- and sea-based nukes); and intercontinental for European Russia, the continental United States, and Western Europe.

A Wired magazine article discusses the book Chinese Aerospace Power by Andrew Erickson of America’s Naval War College. He argues that China’s PLA compensates for its relative weakness by deploying more and more missiles. “For every category of weaponry where the People’s Liberation Army lags behind the Pentagon, there’s a Chinese missile to help make up the difference,” Erickson explains.

Those two assessments point to China’s missile strategies. Battlefield rockets can severely degrade or neutralize opposing forces, such as the vastly superior carrier-based and long-range aircraft of the United States. The forest of anti-ship and anti-aircraft batteries along the coast would deter even a well-protected carrier group from getting too close should there be fighting over, say, Taiwan or the Spratlys.

Long-range and intercontinental missiles, on the other hand, could make nuclear powers like the US think twice about nuking China, thus casting some doubt on the so-called ‘nuclear umbrella’ over American allies. If Chinese atomic weapons hit Japan or the Philippines, would the US retaliate, knowing that China could nuke Los Angeles or New York City in retaliation?

For some Western security experts, an anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) is the “most alarming weapon [that] China is developing.” Mounted on a mobile launch vehicle, it is China’s first missile that can change course to hit a moving target. When launched, the ASBM will rise to reach space and then “maneuver at hypersonic speeds on its way back down.” Aircraft carriers, the core of US power projection in the Asia-Pacific region, could be seriously threatened.

That’s not all. In September, China confirmed the successful testing of its anti-missile system to shoot down projectiles in mid-air, the International Business Times reported. Deployed in large numbers, they could protect military bases and rocket and artillery arrays from attack by missiles and unmanned drones, America’s new weapons of choice.

Aviation Week also reported that China’s first stealth fighter jet had just emerged from a secret development program. The anti-radar technology would make it harder to spot Chinese jets attacking naval vessels. The J-20’s test flight “overshadowed” the Beijing visit of US Defense Secretary Robert Gates, according to The New York Times. The Daily Beast, a division of Newsweek, said that the “timing of the aircraft’s release seemed an unsubtle wave at the Taiwan issue.”

The paper “China’s Nuclear Arsenal: Status and Evolution” by the Union of Concerned Scientists, based in Cambridge, Massachusetts (like Harvard), concludes that China’s size and pace of development of its nuclear forces are in line with the view that “the fundamental purpose of China’s nuclear arsenal is to assure potential nuclear adversaries that China can retaliate in response to an attack.” In its defense white paper, China emphasizes its policy of no-first-use of atomic weapons.

“China’s Ballistic Missile Programs: Technologies, Strategies, and Goals” by John Wilson Lewis and Hua Di of Stanford University, reminds readers: “It thus would be a mistake to regard China’s aspirations toward defense development as being any more sinister than those of other great powers.”

As for transparency, China’s nuke deployment and storage are even documented in “China’s Nuclear Warhead Storage and Handling System”, a report by Project 2049, a research group with the aim,
“Guiding decision makers toward a more secure Asia by 2049”.

Still, while some American experts may feel that China isn’t as big a threat as its missile arsenal may suggest, neighboring Asian countries cannot but feel less secure, especially with longstanding disputes over Taiwan, in the South and East China Seas, and border areas of India, Vietnam, and even Russia.

Plainly, the PLA and its burgeoning missile capability can threaten much of Asia, and even make hard for the US to make good on its defense commitments in the region. Moreover, China’s economic rise can further intimidate its neighbors and even the superpower across the Pacific. Any country wanting a decent slice of its market cannot afford to pick a fight with China, and that includes the US — now China’s biggest debtor, with the latter’s nearly $1 trillion in US Treasury bills.

So are Chinese missiles making trouble for Asia? Let’s just hope it would make everyone, including the Chinese and the Americans, more careful about rattling sabers. After all, guns aren’t really good for business.
 
Not interested in reading Chinese. Try again. And with a more credible source.

I do.you should go to learn a foreign language,good for helping you get more objective information.
 
There is nothing cheesy here. Tomhawk and brahmos is cruise missiles, while so called Chinese carrier killer is Ballistic missile which can navigated at terminal and pre terminal stage.

At terminal stage Ballistic missiles can achieve upto mach25. It's like free fall. The ballistic missiles follow parabolic path (with little changes). They are thrown high in sky at some angle and assumed that they will follow physics and fall at certain point.

While cruise missile is different thing. Its difficult to achieve mach 10 for them.
I just wonder if DF-21D can hit a moving target like a warship or not.If it can, so do Russia-USA have any anti ship missile with similar speed ?
 
Back
Top Bottom