$@rJen
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2012
- Messages
- 6,326
- Reaction score
- -21
- Country
- Location
900 million $$$$
Picture.... US puts some cash on the front shirt pocket and when the guy gives a smile , he gets a big slap on the face
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
900 million $$$$
do it if you can. see how we will handle you. no use to big mouth here, loser
There is.Zhou Enlai already made that offer in 1960, of a mutual recognition of each others held territories.
Nehru responded with the Forward Policy.
And in this situation today, it is China again who is making the move to compromise.
There is something in the Indian government that opposes any sort of settlement or compromise in this region, I wonder if it still exists now that Modi is in charge.
Bull$hit.A strategic alliance between China and India, if that is the long term goal of Chinese govt. will make China an instant enemy of people of Pakistan and Bangladesh. Not that smaller countries like us matter much in the bigger scheme of things, but it will make things crystal clear for our future direction. It will be a new beginning for India as well as rest of South Asia.
........Give me the Link please!...Acceptable one if possible.Historical Demographics of Kashmir
In the 1901 Census of the British Indian Empire, the population of the princely state of Kashmir was 2,905,578. Of these 2,154,695 were Muslims, 689,073 Hindus, 25,828 Sikhs, and 35,047 Buddhists. The Hindus were found mainly in Jammu, where they constituted a little less than 50% of the population.[88] In the Kashmir Valley, the Hindus represented "only 524 in every 10,000 of the population (i.e. 5.24%), and in the frontier wazarats of Ladhakh and Gilgit only 94 out of every 10,000 persons (0.94%)."[88] In the same Census of 1901, in the Kashmir Valley, the total population was recorded to be 1,157,394, of which the Muslim population was 1,083,766, or 93.6% of the population
please see the high lighted part .. it was done in 1901 ... so it safe to say no pandits were forced out of kashmir them ... majority of population is kashmir .. if u combine budhhist, sikhs and hindus even then they are much less then muslims .. so should majority rules?? isnt it what democrazy is about .. muslims are in minority iun kashmir so had constition the way u like .. now in kashmir they are in majority .. so they should get what they are preffered.. indian memebers accuse that pandits are forced out so that how can the decision can be made without them .. 2 points i like to make here ... WHAT HAPPENED TO PANDITS IS BCOZ OF INDIA.. local population was forced to be in india, they took it out on pandits.. same thing happen in people who supported pakistan in 1971 .. they were butchered by banagaldesh.. now im trying to make a point .. when u take away their freedom, rape their women and kill their childern .. obviously they will hate india and their sympathisers ... Even if every pandits is reallocated still muslims are in majority, if any refrendum will take place muslims will be in big majority .., specially if u consider both indian and pakistan side of Kashmir
China is India's #1 trading partner at a bilateral trade between both countries almost $50 billion this year. If they settle their border issue and focus on economic integration , it would benefit both parties for the long term.
Playing chess ... it's a big deal ? Last time when PRC and Russia solve their disputed area at Sino-Russia borders, China also validly waived Stanovoy Range area, it ever belonged to China Qing Empire. It was bigger than South of Tibet.
So China should realize the truth, make a useful friend.
Lol, i think lots of indians rating me...
But I'm being honest here. If India wants to be our friend, it's for her own interest. An enemy won't shake hand, only if it's beneficial for her.
Also no country can replace Pakistan. Iran doesn't border China, Afghan too unstable, India too big and won't bow to China. China needs to feed its western part or they'll face revoult. It needs gawadar for faster import and export. It's building railway for gawadar to china only, not entire Pakistan, because it needs the railway for her benefits. Take suez canal for example, everyone supports it, because it benefits everyone. But do all countries invest in Egypt? No, it wouldn't do them any good.
China isn't raping Pakistan badly, and perhaps it may have good intention. But, like i said, there's no free lunch. Unfortunately, if the members at pdf say CHINA BEST FRIEND PAKISTAN FOREVER, well, sad news but, no Chinese member hold high gov't position from PDF. And they're the decision makers. They know what they're getting through these investment.
Lastly, remember singapore had gawadar port? But it was given to China recently. So all these investments do play a role. If USA was investing money, it would've been given to USA. etc.
I didn't say i hate army, he said it. He said it because he thinks I like pmln. He thinks pmln hates army.
So because he THINKS i'm pmln slave and because he THINKS pmln hates army, he THINKS i hate army too. Get it?
And I may seem like posting anti Pakistani, but all I want is Pakistan to wake up. A nation has no dad or mom to turn to. Pakistan must become independent and control its resources. China is there just as US was.
If i want betterment of Pakistan and it makes me anti pakistani, so be it.
In 2000s early Sino-Russia lands dispute solution, PRC abandoned Stanovoy Range lands which ever belong to China Qing Empire now it belong to Russia, Russia sent half of Bolshoy Ussuriysky Island in Amur River back to China.They can't as it would set a bad precedent in the island dispute. They would realize that China can bend.
what are you trying to say?As a reaction to Pivot to Asia, China is trying to woo India, so India remains neutral and does not join the anti-China alliance.
Even aside from geopolitics, It is in Chinese economic interest to resolve bilateral disputes and develop a healthy business, trade and investment relationship with India. This is not necessarily a bad thing for other South Asian neighbors of India. More trade and business is good for all nations. Increasing business relationship will also have the potential to give China a leverage to influence and reduce India's interventionist foreign policy, which I pointed out in this thread:
Can Nonintervention-ist East Asian states reign in an Intervention-ist India?
But growth of business and trade does not mean development of military alliance or even the possibility of one in the future.
As long as China remains committed to equal or more business, trade and investment as well as future military alliance relationship with other nations in South Asia, such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Nepal and possibly future allies like Bhutan and Maldives, then these nations should not worry too much about growing China-India business relationship.
If India can pull off the feat of becoming a military ally of China and are able to buy Chinese military hardware, only then these nations should start worrying, not before that. Besides how much of an alternative do nations like Pakistan and Bangladesh have? Is the West suddenly going to ally with majority Sunni Muslim nations?
Japan does not have the historical baggage like the West with the Muslim world, in fact Japan had quite a pro-Muslim stance before and during WWII due to geopolitical reasons. But today Japanese population have been brainwashed by zionist Islamophobic media that shapes the world view of global population. If Japanese govt. and people realize that their national interest would not be well served by following this blind hatred then they are welcome to become a more involved development partner in the Sunni Muslim world. If China can develop good business relations with India, Japan or even the West should have no problem doing it in a bigger scale with the Muslim world. But please do not expect any military alliance as a reward for this gesture.
Having said all this, China needs to be careful about how this new post-election Modi-era boost of China-India relationship looks to China's friend nations. If these nations do not get a proportionate or more business, trade and investment and a firm commitment for future military alliance, then it will be easy for China's enemies to portray this growing China-Russia-India-Iran nexus as some kind of anti Sunni Muslim alliance bloc of sorts. I think a China-Russia military alliance would be tolerable and even welcome by some, but having a future military alliance with India and/or Iran would be a red line for many majority Sunni Muslim nations. That would be a strong signal that China has firmly moved towards the anti-Muslim (Sunni) camp of the world.
Go and see it yourself.. its your terrritory right?
You mean you want to be a traitor,I don't believe it.Even Japan would not give up its northern 4 Islands why us so easily to give up our land to an alien nation?
A strategic alliance between China and India, if that is the long term goal of Chinese govt. will make China an instant enemy of people of Pakistan and Bangladesh. Not that smaller countries like us matter much in the bigger scheme of things, but it will make things crystal clear for our future direction. It will be a new beginning for India as well as rest of South Asia.
There will also be great powers that will influence India's decision in this, too. No doubt about that.
Can you provide me any link or copy of 1962 Armistice treaty. Because all I know ceasefire, doesnt know there is a surrender or Armistice.
Any proof of your conspiracy theory.