China mulling 'small scale military ops' against India: Media :

[ashok321]

The pretext of this potential conflict would be New Delhi's military incursion into disputed (and according to others, Chinese) territory, an unilateral decision that to this day remains an unprecedented and unwarranted move. There is no debate, even amongst India's leaders, which party here took the initiative.

Disputed territory?
How?
What is documented on this so far?
Any official demarcation?
Any UNO involvement?

 

[Jackdaws]

small operation? just look at the scale of our army deployment, this will be very very big.

I even don't bother to tell our strategy here, pretty much simple. In doklam, we will destroy every india air field, missle field, army quarters etc with blanket firing power coverage, then hundred of armed drones will stay above india sky day and light to attack supply line, leave those thousands of india's malnourished, primitive mountain soldiers high and dry. Soon they will cannibalize with each other, until the last one starve to death. The whole process will take roughly one month.

In the mean time , our tank division will march toward kashimir and liberate it, then take a detour eastward to totally cut off india's chicken neck. I will leave the rest for people's imagination.

Attached is one pr0poganda clip to show china is combat readiness.
http://bbs.tianya.cn/post-333-1204198-1.shtml

Very good. Why stop there. Cut across all of India and liberate Tamil Nadu and join it up with Sri Lanka.

 

[Akasa]

Disputed territory?
How?
What is documented on this so far?
Any official demarcation?
Any UNO involvement?

"Disputed" if you wish to take into account India's support of Bhutan's claim, which is enforced by 2007 friendship treaty between the two states.
"Undisputed" if you go by the 1890 Sino-British treaty which demarcates the region to be part of China.

Neither designation gives any one party a green light to dispatch military personnel to the place.

 

[ashok321]

"Disputed" if you wish to take into account India's support of Bhutan's claim, which is enforced by 2007 friendship treaty between the two states.
"Undisputed" if you go by the 1890 Sino-British treaty which demarcates the region to be part of China.

Neither designation gives any one party a green light to dispatch military personnel to the place.

How is any friendship treaty allowed to claim a 3rd party land as disputed?
Bunkum.

 

[surya kiran]

Warning number what?

 

[Akasa]

How is any friendship treaty allowed to claim a 3rd party land as disputed?
Bunkum.

Because a "friendship treaty" concerning an area previously divvied to a third party must involve the third party in the first place?

Ask yourself why China doesn't set up a "friendship treaty" with Pakistan and deploy troops to Kashmir in order to claim it as part of Pakistan.

Thus, depending on who you ask, what India did was essentially violate the neutrality of a disputed region at best, or invade Chinese territory at its worst.

 

[surya kiran]

Ask yourself why China doesn't set up a "friendship treaty" with Pakistan and deploy troops to Kashmir in order to claim it as part of Pakistan.

Because the minute you do that, an Indo US mutual defence pact is assured. You guys are $h!t scared of that. No balls to do it is more the answer to your query.

 

[ashok321]

what India did was essentially violate the neutrality of a disputed region at best, or invade Chinese territory at its worst.

Now we are talking!

 

[Maler]

India wants war.

China is under the delusion that they are the ones getting ready for war.
In fact it's India which has planned this meticulously to destroy Chinese reputation and restrict them to other side of SCS.
The best way to get rid of 50 billion dollar trade deficit is forcing China to attack India.

In the end India will not only kick some commie butt but also destroy the Chinese business in India.

Exactly, India trapped China at a place of its choosing!!! China can issue warnings, threats or what not, but can't do anything substantial here!!! China is at tight spot in Chumbi valley, It is kill zone prepared by Indian Army and Chinese will get massacred if it decide to move in. China can't open another front as it knows that will be retaliated in the sea!!! So, interesting days days ahead and all you be listening from commies in the coming days will be warnings!!!

 

[Akasa]

Because the minute you do that, an Indo US mutual defence pact is assured. You guys are $h!t scared of that. No balls to do it is more the answer to your query.

Then ask yourself this question: where has the United States been all this time since the beginning of the Doklam standoff? Certainly not deterring the Chinese, it seems.

 

[noksss]

 

[surya kiran]

Then ask yourself this question: where has the United States been all this time since the beginning of the Doklam standoff? Certainly not deterring the Chinese, it seems.

That's because we dont need them for you lot. Any defence pact will get triggered only if you sign a defence pact by you with your new play thing.

In the current scenario, all that have seen from your end is warnings and more warnings and even more warnings. Guess what the GoI has stated, we are not going anywhere till you stop building the road. What cleared message do you want?

Indian reply to Chinese warnings should be memes.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

Small military operation???
They are gonna get hard beating as Indian army is a master in small military operation.
Chinese you have chosen wrong option if it is true.

really???
unfortunately your army is not present on Chinese border. 75 percent deployed to get beating on western border.

 

[war&peace]

It is China's right to reclaim its areas occupied by Indian occupation forces and we totally support China in this in principles. Pakistan should help China in this regard on all levels and keep all the options open.

 

[Akasa]

That's because we dont need them for you lot. Any defence pact will get triggered only if you sign a defence pact by you with your new play thing.

In the current scenario, all that have seen from your end is warnings and more warnings and even more warnings. Guess what the GoI has stated, we are not going anywhere till you stop building the road. What cleared message do you want?

Indian reply to Chinese warnings should be memes.

So, you need the United States in a potential conflagration in Kashmir, but not so in a war with China? Seems like your proposition needs some patching up to do with respect to its underlying logic.