What's new

China is guilty of mass genocide against 1.2 million people of Tibet

You admit evil Indian soldier. A pot calling a Kettle black. What right do you have to accuse of others. Stupid Indian. :enjoy:

Just like a rapist trying to educate others on Womens right. :lol:
More whataboutery. :lol:
 
.
More whataboutery. :lol:
I know you have nothing to say. I hit right on nail. Indian are bunch of hypocrite and pathetic human beings. Laugh at others human right record, pollution and brag about Mumbai better than Shanghai. Self delusion and practice the blaming mentality are sure a good way to ease your frustration. :lol:

I think there is no mirror in every Indian household. :enjoy:


 
.
I know you have nothing to say. I hit right on nail. Indian are bunch of hypocrite and pathetic human beings. Laugh at others human right record, pollution and brag about Mumbai better than Shanghai. Self delusion and practice the blaming mentality are sure a good way to ease your frustration. :lol:

I think there is no mirror in every Indian household. :enjoy:


:blah:
 
. . .
90% of the population in Tibet are Tibetan today, Mr Clown.:crazy::crazy::crazy:

That doesn't change the facts in the first post of this thread. That China tries to deny all of that, with you Chinese poster-boys here not offering one shred of counter-evidence/claims, just unfounded denials and blame-shifting, is deplorable.
 
.
That doesn't change the facts in the first post of this thread. That China tries to deny all of that, with you Chinese poster-boys here not offering one shred of counter-evidence/claims, just unfounded denials and blame-shifting, is deplorable.
Are you a baby who needs to spoon fed? Is it that hard to comprehend an ethnicity with total of few million would not be exist if a million of them were killed?The Tibetan population has increased multiple times in the last fifty years.
 
Last edited:
.
Are you a baby who needs to spoon fed? Is it that hard to comprehend an ethnicity with total of few million would not be exist if a million of them were killed?The Tibetan population has increased multiple times in the last fifty years.

they probably just have large families.

you still haven't been able to refute the number of Tibetans killed by the Chinese government,
nor have you put forth any counter-evidence to the claims made in the first post in this thread.
 
.
they probably just have large families
Do you think human are rat, with a third of the population gone, still be able to multiple the number in half a decade?If you still can not comprehend, do not bother.
 
.
.
Apparently it's you who is *refusing* to comprehend.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Tibet_(1950–present)#Occupation_and_genocide

https://www.washingtonpost.com/arch...d93cbfd/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.b79531fa77e1

i didn't even use Tibetan reports, these are unbiased western reports.
Told you do not bother unless you could answer me the question how does the population multiply if one third of them were killed?
PS: lol to the so called "unbias" western reports and the "Tibetan report" must be as true as those human skin Thangka from Dalai-lama's collection.
 
. .
No need to reply to this Australian scum. He simply hates China, and whatever explanation you give, he still does, as Australia will soon to be the economic colony of China.

His country committed genocide to the Aborigines, as a larger level and on purpose, and average Aborigines still live in primitive conditions, compared to relatively modern living condition of average Tibetan. period.
 
.
You are one despicable POS who calls himself peacefan but spreads NATO lies and propaganda like that other POS who calls himself truth ...

i don't spread propaganda. i use unbiased news sources to make my arguments.
what lies did i spread according to you?

and eh, i think you would be countering my "lies" with arguments and online sources, if you want to win this discussion. but that's something Chinese posters often don't bother with. it's the only way to really win a discussion though.


Told you do not bother unless you could answer me the question how does the population multiply if one third of them were killed?
because the women in Tibet on average have 4 kids. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12321528
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
i don't spread propaganda. i use unbiased news sources to make my arguments.
what lies did i spread according to you?

and eh, i think you would be countering my "lies" with arguments and online sources, if you want to win this discussion. but that's something Chinese posters often don't bother with. it's the only way to really win a discussion though.



because the women in Tibet on average have 4 kids. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12321528

Unbiased my foot! Either you are utterly ignorant or purposely spreading lies and propaganda by citing CIA controlled Wikipedia.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom