Fsjal
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2013
- Messages
- 1,579
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@gpit Coming from American makes it a joke. You guys have your own interest and you act according to it, even if that means millions die.
Many countries do that. One can't trust US over anything. Its a fact buddy. But I don't find it weird.
gpit is a clown. I assume he is Taiwanese.
Yes, that´s the fact. Nations act based upon egoistic interests.
China says SC sea has been its internal waters since ages. So tell me why you started claiming SC Sea in the middle of 1900´s, and not ealier? you clown!
You are so funny. How many times more do you want to discuss about the intention of the visit and letter?
ingrate seems to be your favorite word.
China´s army in the 1970´s was poorly trained and equipped, stuck in Mao´s ideology warfare, a disorganised bunch without any discipline. Thanks to encounters with Vietnam, PLA has today become a modern army, capable to challenge America. You can say "Thank You VN!".
China's swift military moving forward? What a joke!
Without pudency, Vietnam´s 2-week blitzkrieg in Cambodia (and occupying of Laos) was decisive and deadly, comparable to German army victories at the begin of WW II.
So you personally as Taiwanese will vow to live under China communist rule, right? Good luck! Time to leave US and return to Beijing!Taiwanese or mainlander, they are both Chinese. Similarly, ROC or PRC, both are China.
You are funny. I compared the performance of two nations on successfully conducting blitzkieg, nothing else.Dont know what you are raving. When you try to equal yourself to animal Nazi German and feel proud of it like many other human scum, we normally see your invasion of Cambodia a joke leaving only you type of imbecile to rant
At the current pace of China´s defence budget, we (Vietnam) will see soon a second America military machine next door.
Just tried a mathematical assumption breakdown (grossly large view and assumptions) of the Budget... The investment and Acquisition Budget doesn't seems to be huge, if this is the real budget... Comments, folks?
Specification Units Cost
Defence Personnel 25,00,000
Total Salary costs 42,857
Operating Cost Army (60% of Personnel Costs) 26,786
# of planes 2,800
Annual running costs - Jets and Vehicles 10,920
Maintenance costs (~50% of running Costs) 5,460
# of ships 1,000
Annual running costs - Jets and Vehicles 5,260
Maintenance costs (~50% of running Costs) 2,730
Testing & replacement costs (20% of Gross running costs) 3,276
Net Running Budget Consumption 97,289
Defence Budget 1,09,000
Investment Capability - R&D & Assets 11,711
Investment Split Assumption
Investment in R&D (40% of funds) 4,684
Investment in new builds & expansion (60% of funds) 7,027
A relatively small acquisition budget is to be expected. Majority of PLA equipment is domestically made, thus they cost only a fraction of the standard sale price in arms market.