What's new

China has the right to develop new weapons the same as the West

Lankan Ranger

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
12,550
Reaction score
0
China has the right to develop new weapons the same as the West

Recently, a large number of U.S. media speculation China J -20 fighters, "aircraft carrier killer" and other killers, which makes Sino-US relations in the good atmosphere since this new year hit the wall of suspicion strategy.

Beware of China-US strategic mutual caused numerous wall, with two of the elite or the wall between the two countries, or clever in the wall between the wall and find the pathway. More optimistic about Chinese society in the future playing dice, and the U.S. some people are always encouraged to do "for the worst."

United States developed new weapons to China rumors "very worried" not only normal to normal. About all the big countries want their military superiority is eternal and absolute, but turn that hope into a pursuit should not matter on the planet. The rapid development of China is a big country in the western Pacific to China military superiority may gradually shrink, this is not to be surprised.

In the long run, both fifth-generation fighter, or the so-called anti-aircraft weapons, the Chinese armed forces should not be a luxury. Even if not, there will be future of the Chinese army. However, these offensive weapons and China is no equal sign between the offensive, a few more killer, the Chinese will not have to take the initiative to challenge the United States knows better than to use them.

American public opinion, yelling, reflecting the psychological U.S. can not keep up the pace of change in China, this gap constitutes a danger to Sino-US relations, Washington and Beijing are highly worthy of attention.

Some people tried to calculate, what kind of development speed of China, in particular the pace of development in the United States military to withstand the extreme social and psychological. If faster than this, what is the risk.

These events show that the United States and the West did not regard China as a "great power" to deal with, let alone respect. For example, they believe that China should not have world-class, even second-class military power. They believe that China should continue to be imposed by the West to withstand a variety of unfair practices. Allow them to China "be fair", they considered to be "moving the cheese."

Some Americans put great value on the aircraft carrier in the China policy, and they have so naive as to think that while several carriers can be sealed with a large Chinese to China, this dragon can be trapped in a cricket tank.

The aircraft carrier is more Fuxiao Guo, weak tool of hegemony, the future of China would be able to find more than a tool and means to subdue it, and counted in a few years before that there is no point. Is that Sino-US relations should be divided into different critical point of it?

Sino-US relations should not suffer, "secretly competing with" stress. We do not recognize a sharp knife cut off this mess, we must solve a little bit of it had to be untied to mess with it, it is very important. Then our hearts to calm, just like in a noisy waiting room can sleep.

We will hear more talk about the development of China’s military power, at some point, these arguments will become even protest. But all this does not necessarily mean the limits of Western tolerance. After all have to admit that China has developed new weapons, like the West as the right.

The world staged a "rising China" a multi-act play, we are willing to bet that the final outcome is a comedy.

China has the right to develop new weapons the same as the West | WAREYE
 
The US are big advocates of "human rights", yes? Well, guess what, countries have their national rights, too. China for the last 200 years have been one of the most oppressed countries in the world and their people, culture, government have been spit on and trampled on.

Yes, I'm pretty sure once in a while China also tends to be more assertive to other countries, but the US should reign in its diplomatic missions for the sake of peace.
 
Sooo...Who said China does not have this right and why is China exempted from any concerns by other countries regarding military build-ups?
 
^^ I thought Chinese weapons were "inferior copies" of Western ones any ways. What is the cause of concern that you are talking about?

Americans are very sensitive to casualty figures, if your inferior weapons can kill more than they can stomarch, their moral will fall. 恶人无胆。

US's barometer for winning a battle is based on casualty figures rather than objectives. You always see US news always report so many enemy killed against so many American killed in a battle as if it is a football game.
 
Sooo...Who said China does not have this right

Gates for one, the american military establishment for another, and the whole western media when it condemned chinese ASAT test while they merely mewled when the americans shot down their satelite a week later.

The western media has a *reputation* in the international world for pursuing national self-interest in their coverage.
 
We have to say this, only to make it more clear to the apes occupying the seats of power in the West with their limited IQ. I'm sorry, apes are great and noble creatures of the wild. Wall Street sharks (Sorry again to the sharks, one of the most successful evolutionary designs) and Western politicos are scum.
 
China's development modern weapon is only defends, the American worried that the modern weapon causes American whole world hegemony some people to challenge, China's modern weapon regarding the world is a peace! The American does not develop the advanced weapons, China does not need to develop the advanced weapons, is the American causes the world the arms race!
 
Totally agree.

China has the right to develop new weapons the same as the West

Recently, a large number of U.S. media speculation China J -20 fighters, "aircraft carrier killer" and other killers, which makes Sino-US relations in the good atmosphere since this new year hit the wall of suspicion strategy.

Beware of China-US strategic mutual caused numerous wall, with two of the elite or the wall between the two countries, or clever in the wall between the wall and find the pathway. More optimistic about Chinese society in the future playing dice, and the U.S. some people are always encouraged to do "for the worst."

United States developed new weapons to China rumors "very worried" not only normal to normal. About all the big countries want their military superiority is eternal and absolute, but turn that hope into a pursuit should not matter on the planet. The rapid development of China is a big country in the western Pacific to China military superiority may gradually shrink, this is not to be surprised.

In the long run, both fifth-generation fighter, or the so-called anti-aircraft weapons, the Chinese armed forces should not be a luxury. Even if not, there will be future of the Chinese army. However, these offensive weapons and China is no equal sign between the offensive, a few more killer, the Chinese will not have to take the initiative to challenge the United States knows better than to use them.

American public opinion, yelling, reflecting the psychological U.S. can not keep up the pace of change in China, this gap constitutes a danger to Sino-US relations, Washington and Beijing are highly worthy of attention.

Some people tried to calculate, what kind of development speed of China, in particular the pace of development in the United States military to withstand the extreme social and psychological. If faster than this, what is the risk.

These events show that the United States and the West did not regard China as a "great power" to deal with, let alone respect. For example, they believe that China should not have world-class, even second-class military power. They believe that China should continue to be imposed by the West to withstand a variety of unfair practices. Allow them to China "be fair", they considered to be "moving the cheese."

Some Americans put great value on the aircraft carrier in the China policy, and they have so naive as to think that while several carriers can be sealed with a large Chinese to China, this dragon can be trapped in a cricket tank.

The aircraft carrier is more Fuxiao Guo, weak tool of hegemony, the future of China would be able to find more than a tool and means to subdue it, and counted in a few years before that there is no point. Is that Sino-US relations should be divided into different critical point of it?

Sino-US relations should not suffer, "secretly competing with" stress. We do not recognize a sharp knife cut off this mess, we must solve a little bit of it had to be untied to mess with it, it is very important. Then our hearts to calm, just like in a noisy waiting room can sleep.

We will hear more talk about the development of China’s military power, at some point, these arguments will become even protest. But all this does not necessarily mean the limits of Western tolerance. After all have to admit that China has developed new weapons, like the West as the right.

The world staged a "rising China" a multi-act play, we are willing to bet that the final outcome is a comedy.

China has the right to develop new weapons the same as the West | WAREYE
 
Weapons can be used for both defense and offense.

No country will be stupid enough to build weapons only for defense. For example, are those retaliation weapons defense weapons or offensive weapons.

China's development modern weapon is only defends, the American worried that the modern weapon causes American whole world hegemony some people to challenge, China's modern weapon regarding the world is a peace! The American does not develop the advanced weapons, China does not need to develop the advanced weapons, is the American causes the world the arms race!
 
Military build-ups?

We have such a long coastal lines which are so vital to our Nation.

We have such a long border with many neighboring countries that need protection.

We have been historically invaded by foreign powers for the past 170 years.

We have our economics life line extending through indian oceans.

What do we use to protect them? Asking US navy???

We still have the last major piece (taiwan) of our motherland that still is unresolved.

So the strength of our PLA army is still far from enough.

Building up? What building up? Only when you send your fleet over taiwan strait back and forth or send your fleet near our capital, you stop saying that?

You see, whatever US wants to do to build up its weaponry, it is none of our business.

At the same time, our weaponry development is none of your business as well.

One thing for sure, China will never spend that much money the US does for military development. So it is not in China interest to have a military Olympics with US.

We still can be militarily inferior but still make all the fcukers to fcuking off dreaming interfering China own business including reclaiming taiwan.

Of course, China has no interest interfering affairs of others.



Sooo...Who said China does not have this right and why is China exempted from any concerns by other countries regarding military build-ups?
 
BTW, just a quick question about this forum's change of appearance:

Does it have anything to do with the lost of all my past posts?

I have about 100 posts totally disappeared into the thin air after I log back today. They were still there several days ago.

Am I being harmonized?
 
BTW, just a quick question about this forum's change of appearance:

Does it have anything to do with the lost of all my past posts?

I have about 100 posts totally disappeared into the thin air after I log back today. They were still there several days ago.

Am I being harmonized?

You do not exist and we do not see you... :cool:















p.s. please make a post on the "Suggestions & Discussions" section instead.
 
Oh Nice title,it is the art of speaking

but I preferred this one:

China has the right to copy everything in the world in the universe!

Come on! Copycat!

Copy it! Copy it! Copy it!......
 

Back
Top Bottom