China Has Deployed Nuclear Weapons Near Indian Border, Can Hit Targets Within Minutes: PLA Officer

[GumNaam]

Pakistan had legitimate territorial claim on all land given to it by the British. But instead, to avoid war with China, you gifted 5500sq km of Shaksgam valley without a fight.

1. your wrong.
2. for the sake of argument, let's pretend that your right which your not. how does that change anything your dismal state of affairs?

 

[arjunk]

Pakistan had legitimate territorial claim on all land given to it by the British. But instead, to avoid war with China, you gifted 5500sq km of Shaksgam valley without a fight.

Erm, I know Indians have a tendency to cling to a colonial master by claiming the name, language and religion they were branded with, but Pakistan likes to make its own decisions and not fight wars it can't handle.

 

[Baba_Yaga]

Funny how India is the one at a loss of 86,000 km2 after 4 wars and all they have to say is love jihad and pigeon jihad

India's loss is only 33000 sq km lost to China. In 1947, all Muslim areas were supposed to go to Pakistan and all Hindu areas to India. When the Nizam of Hyderabad tried to join Pakistan despite having majority Hindu population, we spanked him and got all the land. On the other hand, Kashmir was supposed to go to Pakistan, but we took 75% of it from you, so its we who won that war. Add to that the 1971 humiliation. Your land loss is around 300,000 sq km.

 

[GumNaam]

Nope excuse is 93000 surrendering without a fight

so those 3000 indians were killed by aliens?

 

[Baba_Yaga]

but Pakistan likes to make its own decisions and not fight wars it can't handle.

In other words, you like to surrender without a fight and cede land when hopeless instead of fighting to the last man. Good, that's exactly what I am saying.

 

[Avatar]

You can believe whatever your media feeds you, but a trip to China and India will clearly see the difference between the two countries in reality.

I have been to China and I have seen first hand what you call progress.. We are better off without your version of progress, because we love our freedom of speech and thought more than your cheap trinkets.

 

[Sabretooth]

In other words, you like to surrender without a fight and cede land when hopeless instead of fighting to the last man. Good, that's exactly what I am saying.

No. We like to regroup and live to kick your b**s another day like 27 Feb 2019.

 

[newb3e]

Pakistan had legitimate territorial claim on all land given to it by the British. But instead, to avoid war with China, you gifted 5500sq km of Shaksgam valley without a fight.

chamatain aur latain aur dandday khaa keh zameen day di aur ab bhi argue kar rahay ho!!

kamal log ho!

 

[Baba_Yaga]

No. We like to regroup and live to kick your b**s another day like 27 Feb 2019.

Great, your victory was downing a 1960s jet, our victory was dividing your country and capturing Siachen. Nice to know you have such a low definition of victory . In the next war, we should capture a lot of your territory and allow you to shoot down a few mig 21s

 

[Rajputana_]

Can we see those nuclear weapons to confirm if they even work?

Right now chinamen ccp can't reclaim Taiwan and hong kong, as long as the royal navy and USN are covering it.

Commies and their bluffing games, only the naive and the weak believe them.

 

[Chhatrapati]

Is it a race thing, the affinity for U-235?

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

I don't really care about your petty politics. Like who cares? We have 200 nukes, more than enough to destroy the all of asia if not the world. You might have 500, but that don't mean anything. If we go down, we will take the entire region with us.

only thermonuclear weapons count. your 200 nukes are weak 1940's levels nukes with a mere 50 kT yield.

in 1960's China tested a 3000 kT yield weapon.

a single DF-5 has a 5000 kT yield weapon. A single DF-5 is larger than your entire arsenal.

 

[Figaro]

India does not even possess thermonuclear weapons nor any advanced ballistic missiles ... most likely their nuclear missiles would be intercepted by the HQ-19 and HQ-26 with relative ease. If anything, there nuclear weapons program is a couple decades behind even that of North Korea.

 

[Baba_Yaga]

only thermonuclear weapons count. your 200 nukes are weak 1940's levels nukes with a mere 50 kT yield.

in 1960's China tested a 3000 kT yield weapon.

a single DF-5 has a 5000 kT yield weapon. A single DF-5 is larger than your entire arsenal.

I only need a 9mm bullet to kill you, not a 120 mm shell. . As long as we can get a 200 200kt nukes on Chinese cities, that's no different than 500 3kt nukes on Indian cities. We are counting on radiation, nuclear winter and food shortages to wipe you out rather than the initial blast.

 

[Max]

When we are not afraid of pakistani nukes who are more trigger happy then anyone else in this world, what made you think we will be afraid of chinese nukes?

north korea has long range missiles and possible nukes.... even US never dared to attack it openly. we attacked our neighbor repeatedly.

but why stop you, bring everything you have .... it will delay the loss of face your pla going to get. there is no going back from this now.

usually when anyone mentions the N word, it is very clear that the war is lost already in his mind.... he just need to lose it on the ground.

so pla has lost it already, lets see how long it takes to lose it on ground...

Why use nukes when you can be objective, Pakistan crossed the border when you had nukes and capture your territory overlooking your startegic highway.

Pakistan humiliated Abhinonedone and India had no response . Are we suppose to use nukes after humiliating lowly subhumans of Indian origin?

If we were as trigger happy as you claim (to score brownie against Chinese) you wouldn't exist by now.