What's new

China exec accused of criminal conspiracy set up Huawei in Australia

Joined
Sep 12, 2017
Messages
3,056
Reaction score
-4
Country
Australia
Location
Australia
The Huawei executive at the centre of an international sanctions-busting and trade secrets theft scandal established and oversaw the firm’s Australian operation while she was allegedly engaged in a global criminal conspiracy.

Meng Wanzhou was a director of Huawei’s Australian subsidiary between October 2005 and August 2011, according to corporate records.

7ad20505d91599c5ca5886449a57a82468cb2c93

Huawei chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou arrives at a parole office. Credit: AP

The US Department of Justice alleged on Tuesday that from November 2007 to May 2015, Ms Meng was engaged in a criminal conspiracy aimed at defeating trade sanctions to enable Huawei to covertly operate a business in Iran.

The indictment, released by the department on Tuesday morning, comes after the US and Australian governments have spent years warning other nations about the security risks posed by Huawei’s ties to the Chinese Communist Party.

The outlining of the formal charges against Ms Meng is the latest in a dramatic escalation of hostilities between China and the West after her arrest in December in Canada. Since then, tensions have risen in the on-going trade war between the US and China, and Australian-Chinese writer Yang Hengjun and two Canadians have been detained by Chinese authorities.

There is no suggestion in the Department of Justice's case against Ms Meng that she was involved in any criminal activity in Australia.

But while she worked as a director in Australia, Ms Meng is alleged to have been a central player in a conspiracy to defraud international banks and US officials about Huawei’s Iran operations.


Ms Meng was allegedly engaged in this criminal activity for four of the years she was an Australian Huawei director. As a director, she was responsible for Huawei’s corporate governance and strategy, as well as overseeing its early efforts to take part in Australia’s NBN roll-out.

The Gillard Labor government banned Huawei from the NBN in late 2011, citing national security concerns. The ban was later upheld by the Turnbull coalition government.

Huawei was founded by Ms Meng’s father, former Chinese army engineer turned industrialist Ren Zhengfei, and has become one of the biggest telecommunications companies in the world.

Central to Huawei’s Australian operations is its message to politicians, the business community and the media that it can be trusted to withstand potential pressure from the Chinese government to snoop on or sabotage data and phone networks.

In 2011, Huawei sought to amplify this pitch by restructuring its local operations with high-profile director appointments, including former Victorian premier John Brumby, former foreign minister Alexander Downer and former Navy rear admiral John Lord.

94da4210652f2f061ba944087b174c7b8b1b9662

Former Victorian premier John Brumby and John Lord were announced as board members of Huawei in May 2011. Credit: Wayne Taylor

Ms Meng stood down from the Australian board shortly after the trio’s appointment. Huawei has also paid for trips to China for Labor and coalition politicians and hired ex-political staffers as advisers.

Mr Downer resigned from the board in 2014 when he became Australia’s UK High Commissioner.

Since the Australian trio’s appointment as directors in 2011, western intelligence agencies and governments have consistently raised security concerns about Huawei.

Concerns raised since 2010 by Australia’s security agencies culminated in the recent banning of Huawei from Australia’s 5G rollout.


Mr Brumby, Mr Lord and Mr Downer have all claimed there has been no hard evidence to sustain the concerns. On Tuesday, The Age sought comments from Mr Brumby and Mr Lord about the US indictment, but neither responded to interview requests.

In addition to the Iran sanctions charges, Huawei has been indicted for stealing trade secrets from rival T-Mobile.

Earlier this month, Polish officials charged a Huawei manager and a former Polish intelligence agency official with spying for Beijing.

HSBC and several other major banks have moved to cut business ties with Huawei, citing due diligence concerns.

In a statement, Huawei said it was “disappointed to learn of the [US] charges.”

“The Company denies that it or its subsidiary or affiliate have committed any of the asserted violations of U.S. law set forth in each of the indictments, is not aware of any wrongdoing by Ms. Meng, and believes the U.S. courts will ultimately reach the same conclusion,” the statement said.

Mr Brumby and Mr Lord and, until he left, Mr Downer, have been well paid as Huawei directors. It’s understood the firm pays some local directors up to $250,000 a year, although the company declined to confirm this.

Mr Brumby is a prominent advocate for Chinese-Australian business ties and sceptic of claims Beijing uses Chinese companies to covertly advance its interests or engage in foreign interference.

In February 2017, Mr Brumby voiced this scepticism to senior Australian government official Richard Maude during a private consultation session on Australia’s foreign policy whitepaper.


A source at the meeting said that Mr Maude explained that the Australian government’s private assessments were at odds with the former premier's views: “If you read what I read, you wouldn’t be saying that,” the sources said Mr Maude told Mr Brumby.

Outgoing federal Labor MP Michael Danby, a noted hawk on China, and former Victorian Labor parliamentary speaker Ken Coghill said the US charges should prompt the local directors of Huawei to reflect on their own ties to Huawei.

“I would say about all the directors that they have got ethical issues that face them given many of the international actions and reactions of governments around the world regarding Huawei,” Mr Danby said.

https://www.theage.com.au/business/...t-up-huawei-in-australia-20190129-p50uel.html

LOL this is what happens when you steal, try to bully smaller countries and pass off the tech you steal as your own, disgusting Chinese bullies getting a bloody nose.
 
The Huawei executive at the centre of an international sanctions-busting and trade secrets theft scandal established and oversaw the firm’s Australian operation while she was allegedly engaged in a global criminal conspiracy.

Meng Wanzhou was a director of Huawei’s Australian subsidiary between October 2005 and August 2011, according to corporate records.

7ad20505d91599c5ca5886449a57a82468cb2c93

Huawei chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou arrives at a parole office. Credit: AP

The US Department of Justice alleged on Tuesday that from November 2007 to May 2015, Ms Meng was engaged in a criminal conspiracy aimed at defeating trade sanctions to enable Huawei to covertly operate a business in Iran.

The indictment, released by the department on Tuesday morning, comes after the US and Australian governments have spent years warning other nations about the security risks posed by Huawei’s ties to the Chinese Communist Party.

The outlining of the formal charges against Ms Meng is the latest in a dramatic escalation of hostilities between China and the West after her arrest in December in Canada. Since then, tensions have risen in the on-going trade war between the US and China, and Australian-Chinese writer Yang Hengjun and two Canadians have been detained by Chinese authorities.

There is no suggestion in the Department of Justice's case against Ms Meng that she was involved in any criminal activity in Australia.

But while she worked as a director in Australia, Ms Meng is alleged to have been a central player in a conspiracy to defraud international banks and US officials about Huawei’s Iran operations.


Ms Meng was allegedly engaged in this criminal activity for four of the years she was an Australian Huawei director. As a director, she was responsible for Huawei’s corporate governance and strategy, as well as overseeing its early efforts to take part in Australia’s NBN roll-out.

The Gillard Labor government banned Huawei from the NBN in late 2011, citing national security concerns. The ban was later upheld by the Turnbull coalition government.

Huawei was founded by Ms Meng’s father, former Chinese army engineer turned industrialist Ren Zhengfei, and has become one of the biggest telecommunications companies in the world.

Central to Huawei’s Australian operations is its message to politicians, the business community and the media that it can be trusted to withstand potential pressure from the Chinese government to snoop on or sabotage data and phone networks.

In 2011, Huawei sought to amplify this pitch by restructuring its local operations with high-profile director appointments, including former Victorian premier John Brumby, former foreign minister Alexander Downer and former Navy rear admiral John Lord.

94da4210652f2f061ba944087b174c7b8b1b9662

Former Victorian premier John Brumby and John Lord were announced as board members of Huawei in May 2011. Credit: Wayne Taylor

Ms Meng stood down from the Australian board shortly after the trio’s appointment. Huawei has also paid for trips to China for Labor and coalition politicians and hired ex-political staffers as advisers.

Mr Downer resigned from the board in 2014 when he became Australia’s UK High Commissioner.

Since the Australian trio’s appointment as directors in 2011, western intelligence agencies and governments have consistently raised security concerns about Huawei.

Concerns raised since 2010 by Australia’s security agencies culminated in the recent banning of Huawei from Australia’s 5G rollout.


Mr Brumby, Mr Lord and Mr Downer have all claimed there has been no hard evidence to sustain the concerns. On Tuesday, The Age sought comments from Mr Brumby and Mr Lord about the US indictment, but neither responded to interview requests.

In addition to the Iran sanctions charges, Huawei has been indicted for stealing trade secrets from rival T-Mobile.

Earlier this month, Polish officials charged a Huawei manager and a former Polish intelligence agency official with spying for Beijing.

HSBC and several other major banks have moved to cut business ties with Huawei, citing due diligence concerns.

In a statement, Huawei said it was “disappointed to learn of the [US] charges.”

“The Company denies that it or its subsidiary or affiliate have committed any of the asserted violations of U.S. law set forth in each of the indictments, is not aware of any wrongdoing by Ms. Meng, and believes the U.S. courts will ultimately reach the same conclusion,” the statement said.

Mr Brumby and Mr Lord and, until he left, Mr Downer, have been well paid as Huawei directors. It’s understood the firm pays some local directors up to $250,000 a year, although the company declined to confirm this.

Mr Brumby is a prominent advocate for Chinese-Australian business ties and sceptic of claims Beijing uses Chinese companies to covertly advance its interests or engage in foreign interference.

In February 2017, Mr Brumby voiced this scepticism to senior Australian government official Richard Maude during a private consultation session on Australia’s foreign policy whitepaper.


A source at the meeting said that Mr Maude explained that the Australian government’s private assessments were at odds with the former premier's views: “If you read what I read, you wouldn’t be saying that,” the sources said Mr Maude told Mr Brumby.

Outgoing federal Labor MP Michael Danby, a noted hawk on China, and former Victorian Labor parliamentary speaker Ken Coghill said the US charges should prompt the local directors of Huawei to reflect on their own ties to Huawei.

“I would say about all the directors that they have got ethical issues that face them given many of the international actions and reactions of governments around the world regarding Huawei,” Mr Danby said.

https://www.theage.com.au/business/...t-up-huawei-in-australia-20190129-p50uel.html

LOL this is what happens when you steal, try to bully smaller countries and pass off the tech you steal as your own, disgusting Chinese bullies getting a bloody nose.

Talk about criminal activity, here's biggest disgusting thief in the world, reported by UK media. To date, US still haven't found single evidence Huawei product spied, so it's starting to use this dirty underhanded tactics accusing "criminal activity".

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...r-defends-backdoors-into-technology-companies
 
Thief accuses other as thief.

It's funny that USA and Australian government don't know about what everyone know about them.


It's funny, that WhatsApp claimed to protect user privacy. They even put encryption, and says that old message can't be viewed because it has been encrypted and deleted. But when a crime case exist, suddenly all the old data and evidence from WhatsApp appear.

At least, Chinese government is honest. Honest thief.


I remember a case in my country about Telegram. Telegram was planned to be banned, because they really really encrypt and delete the chatting data from the server. It's impossible for policeman and Intel agent to spy and find evidence from Telegram.

I think USA doesn't honest or tell everything about Huawei. Yes, Huawei hardware can be a spying tool for Chinese government.

But what USA didnt tell is... Like the telegram case, USA can't spying using Huawei hardware without permission from Chinese government, or the process is much more bothersome.

Huawei is an obstacle for USA to spying the world and their own citizens.

More CIA propaganda from a pathetic white supremacist.

Zero evidence.

Zero facts.

White people have a long long history of spreading lies and propaganda.

iJijJWd.jpg

Journalists for Hire: How the CIA Buys the News
ps - this guy committed "suicide" by shooting himself in the back of the head with a shotgun, twice.


Going to War: Unraveling the Tangled Web of American Pretext Stratagems (1846-1989)
http://coat.ncf.ca/articles/links/how_to_start_a_war.htm

Even their fake NGO, National Endowment for Democracy (NED), is a tool of the CIA


How many Americans could identify the National Endowment for Democracy? An organization which often **does exactly the opposite of what its name implies.** The **NED was set up in the early 1980s under President Reagan in the wake of all the negative revelations about the CIA** in the second half of the 1970s. The latter was a remarkable period. Spurred by Watergate – the Church committee of the Senate, the Pike committee of the House, and the Rockefeller Commission, created by the president, were all busy investigating the CIA. Seemingly every other day there was a new headline about the discovery of some awful thing, even criminal conduct, the CIA had been mixed up in for years. The Agency was getting an exceedingly bad name, and it was causing the powers- that-be much embarrassment.

**Something had to be done. What was done was not to stop doing these awful things. Of course not. What was done was to shift many of these awful things to a new organization, with a nice sounding name – The National Endowment for Democracy. The idea was that the NED would do somewhat overtly what the CIA had been doing covertly for decades, and thus, hopefully, eliminate the stigma associated with CIA covert activities.**

Thus it was that in 1983, the National Endowment for Democracy was set up to "support democratic institutions throughout the world through private, nongovernmental efforts". **Notice the "nongovernmental" – part of the image, part of the myth. In actuality, virtually every penny of its funding comes from the federal government**, as is clearly indicated in the financial statement in each issue of its annual report. NED likes to refer to itself as an NGO (Non-governmental organization) because this helps to maintain a certain credibility abroad that an official US government agency might not have.

**Allen Weinstein, who helped draft the legislation establishing NED, declared in 1991: "A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA."**

Trojan Horse: The National Endowment for Democracy – William Blum
https://williamblum.org/chapters/rogue-state/trojan-horse-the-national-endowment-for-democracy

The white anglo fascists run a brutal oppressive regime built on racism, hate, deceit, rape, slavery, genocide, and plunder - so called white Christian values.

The same in term of economy.

USA accused other government for too much involvement in economy, breaking the free market rule.

But did you know if USA secretly support the strategic economy sector? Directly and indirectly.

At least Chinese government is very honest about what they do.

China and USA basically are similar.

If you want to know, what is the real USA, just look at China. But because China is honest about what they do, they don't have obstacle to find another route to hide if they are cheating.

Many of USA politicians and statesmen are jealous with China.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom