What's new

China denounces ‘Hong Konger’ trend

Roybot

BANNED
Joined
Dec 14, 2010
Messages
20,064
Reaction score
-2
Country
India
Location
Australia
HONG KONG — Fifteen years after taking back Hong Kong amid a blaze of fireworks and patriotic fervor, China is battling what it sees as a subversive challenge: an academic survey showing that many in this former British colony identify little with China.

The survey, conducted last month by the University of Hong Kong, found that the number of respondents who view themselves as Hong Kongers is more than double the number who see themselves as Chinese and that bonds of shared identity with the mainland have grown weaker since Britain relinquished control in 1997.

Infuriated by the results, Chinese officials have orchestrated a campaign of denunciation — the latest blast in a barrage of verbal and written broadsides against alleged disloyalty in Hong Kong.

As a “special administrative region” within China, Hong Kong largely runs its own affairs under the “one country, two systems” formula enunciated by Deng Xiaoping, China’s late paramount leader. It has its own legal system and currency, issues its own travel documents and allows free speech and other liberties unknown in the rest of China.

In recent months, however, Chinese officials and pro-Beijing media in the former colony have gone on the offensive against a host of public figures whose views they dislike, including pro-democracy politicians, an elderly Catholic priest, an anti-communist media tycoon and the U.S. consul general. Now, they have turned their fire on Robert Chung, the director of Hong Kong University’s Public Opinion Program.

Chung has been surveying Hong Kong identity since the territory’s return to China, and the results of his latest poll merely confirmed anecdotal evidence of a significant trend among residents: growing resentment toward — and a sense of separateness from — mainland Chinese.

On Sunday, hundreds of Hong Kongers protested outside luxury retailer Dolce & Gabbana after complaints that the store discriminated against locals in favor of mainlanders. An influx of shoppers from across the border has delighted Hong Kong retailers but stirred disquiet among ordinary people fearful that their city is being swamped by often-brash newcomers. Hong Kong has a population of about 7 million; the rest of China has more than 1.3 billion people.

A music video made in Hong Kong and posted last year on the Internet sneered at mainlanders as “locusts” who “shout in restaurants, hotels and stores” and show scant regard for the city’s more orderly ways.

Hong Kong news media, meanwhile, have been filled in recent weeks with reports of pregnant mainland women crossing the border to take advantage of Hong Kong’s superior medical system and a rule that babies born in the city have the right of abode here.
Politicians of all stripes have demanded action to halt the flow amid warnings that Hong Kong’s health-care system can’t take the strain. The number of mainland women giving birth in Hong Kong emergency wards nearly tripled last year.

China denounces 'Hong Konger' trend - The Washington Post

---------- Post added at 07:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:32 PM ----------

China’s sharp reaction

Although evidence of Hong Kongers’ fading sense of kinship with China has been mounting for some time, Beijing reacted with startling anger to Chung’s findings. Hao Tiechuan, a senior official at the Chinese government’s liaison office here, called in selected local reporters and lambasted the study as “unscientific” and “illogical,” saying that because Hong Kong is now part of China, it is wrong to ask residents whether they consider themselves Chinese. Media controlled by the Communist Party then directed a torrent of abuse at Chung and his work.

“Chung’s survey has evil political aims,” the Wen Wei Po newspaper opined. The Hong Kong-based paper reviled Chung as a “slave of black political funding” and accused him of seeking to “divide Hong Kong people from their compatriots.” Chung dismissed the allegations as a “Cultural Revolution-style smear campaign.”

The China Daily, a state-run mainland newspaper, ridiculed the survey as “preposterous” and “intent on messing up Hong Kong.” Other party-controlled media in Hong Kong suggested that Chung was being manipulated by foreign interests, including British spies, alleging contacts with David Ford, a former colonial official in Hong Kong with supposed ties to British intelligence. “I do not know David Ford, and I have never met him,” Chung said.

China’s sharp reaction has sparked wary speculation here about its motives. One theory is that officials merely want to display tough nationalist credentials ahead of a leadership transition in Beijing this year. Others note the role of local politics: Hong Kong will get a new chief executive this year — chosen by a 1,200-member committee — and will then start preparations for a real election, with universal suffrage, scheduled for 2017.

Beijing, analysts say, wants to ensure that the expansion of democracy in Hong Kong doesn’t empower “hostile forces” or encourage discussion of what it views as taboo issues, one of the most sensitive of which is identity.

A distinct identity

Determined to uproot separatist sentiment in Tibet, Xinjiang and other regions with large non-Han Chinese populations, Beijing has long insisted that all citizens view themselves only as “Chinese.” Hong Kong is almost entirely Chinese in its ethnic and cultural makeup, but after being separated from China during 156 years of British rule, it has a distinct identity.

Surveys conducted by Chung’s unit at Hong Kong University show that identification with China increased somewhat after the 1997 handover but began to decline after peaking in 2008 when Beijing hosted the Olympic Games. Just 34 percent of those surveyed last month identified themselves as primarily Chinese, and 63 percent emphasized their Hong Kong identity.

Chung declined to speculate on why Hong Kong’s residents appear to identify less with China but said he stands by his findings. “I am not a politician,” he said. “I will let history tell the true value of my work.”

Independent media have rallied to Chung’s defense and voiced alarm at China’s reaction. Instead of attacking Chung, the Ming Pao newspaper said, Beijing officials should ask why Hong Kong’s people “are growing cool towards China.”

China denounces 'Hong Konger' trend - The Washington Post

---------- Post added at 07:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:34 PM ----------

And here's the poll results.

http://hkupop.hku.hk/english/popexpress/ethnic/eidentity/poll/datatables.html
 
.
Wierd how many thought the end of Hong Kong would be 1997. Instead Hong Kong has been established as one of the worlds business centres. One of the most stable banks in the world is HSBC Bank. You are always going to get a minority of people not happy with the way things are - this is inevitable even if the brits were in charge the same would happen. China must be commended with the way they have handled and maintained the business growth in Hong Kong - great work China! :china:
 
. .
This is not news, it is a given essay "Write an article to show that free Hongkong alienates themselves from Communist China". The author then gather every piece of negative news on mainlanders and squeezes them together. There's no coherence of these stories.

As to the survey, you will get the similar numbers if taken in Beijing and Shanghai, or Guangdong (Canton). Because of the nature of diverse culture in China, people tend to bond themselves to their local city. Last year a Beijing official said Beijing has too many people and non Beijinger should not settle in Beijing. And it should not be hard to find some non-Beijing locals mistreated in Beijing. Combining these together someone can write a much eye-catching article like "China's capital resident don't consider themself Chinese citizen". I should take that Washington Post job if my English is better. :P

If anyone lives in Hongkong and see how Hongkong citizens respond to 2008 Sichuan earthquake, he will laugh at this.

Great article for trolling, horrible journalism.
 
. .
It's pathetic to reject their national identity just because China is backward.Let them be,low wretch person.
 
.
This is not news, it is a given essay "Write an article to show that free Hongkong alienates themselves from Communist China". The author then gather every piece of negative news on mainlanders and squeezes them together. There's no coherence of these stories.

As to the survey, you will get the similar numbers if taken in Beijing and Shanghai, or Guangdong (Canton). Because of the nature of diverse culture in China, people tend to bond themselves to their local city. Last year a Beijing official said Beijing has too many people and non Beijinger should not settle in Beijing. And it should not be hard to find some non-Beijing locals mistreated in Beijing. Combining these together someone can write a much eye-catching article like "China's capital resident don't consider themself Chinese citizen". I should take that Washington Post job if my English is better. :P

If anyone lives in Hongkong and see how Hongkong citizens respond to 2008 Sichuan earthquake, he will laugh at this.

Great article for trolling, horrible journalism.

I don't know about you but if you ask "Are you Chinese?" to people in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, they will say yes unless they're really not. That'd be 97% of the population, not 34%. Somehow I doubt 66% of Hong Kongers have foreign citizenship; at most, 15% do. They might alternatively identify themselves as Beijinger or whatever, but will not actively deny that they're Chinese.
 
.
Hong Kong news media, meanwhile, have been filled in recent weeks with reports of pregnant mainland women crossing the border to take advantage of Hong Kong’s superior medical system and a rule that babies born in the city have the right of abode here. Politicians of all stripes have demanded action to halt the flow amid warnings that Hong Kong’s health-care system can’t take the strain. The number of mainland women giving birth in Hong Kong emergency wards nearly tripled last year.



Its a big business
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
I don't know about you but if you ask "Are you Chinese?" to people in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, they will say yes unless they're really not. That'd be 97% of the population, not 34%. Somehow I doubt 66% of Hong Kongers have foreign citizenship; at most, 15% do. They might alternatively identify themselves as Beijinger or whatever, but will not actively deny that they're Chinese.

If you look at the survey, the question is not like "Are you Chinese or not?" Rather, what do you "call" yourself - English translation in that page is "identify", kind of misleading. If you look at the choices, they are not even mutual exclusive. That's why I say you will get similar answers in Beijing, Shanghai, etc. I am sure a lot of people will first say I am Beijinger, that doesn't mean that they don't consider themself Chinese citizen. Ask Beijingwalker. :P
 
. .
Don't know how the Hongkongers be asked,if in mandarin the answer sure to be negative.
 
.
Hong Kong news media, meanwhile, have been filled in recent weeks with reports of pregnant mainland women crossing the border to take advantage of Hong Kong’s superior medical system and a rule that babies born in the city have the right of abode here. Politicians of all stripes have demanded action to halt the flow amid warnings that Hong Kong’s health-care system can’t take the strain. The number of mainland women giving birth in Hong Kong emergency wards nearly tripled last year.



Its a big business

This is well known in China, nothing news worthy. It is just a loophole taken advantage by rich Chinese to work around China's one child policy. Because of the one-country-two system policy, babies born in Hongkong does not violate the one child rule since they are considered as "hongkong hukou". Personally I think both USA and Hongkong should get rid of this silly anchor mom law.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Review & Outlook: Hong Kong Struggle Sessions - WSJ.com

Beijing is turning up the Cultural Revolution rhetoric in Hong Kong again. In recent months, state-owned media and Chinese officials vilified a businessman for donating money to opposition politicians, labeling them American stooges. Then they threatened to expel the U.S. consul general for allegedly interfering in local politics. Even the local head of the Catholic Church was blasted as a "political mercenary."

Now the rectification campaign is focusing on two academics, Robert Chung and Dixon Sing. The main target is Hong Kong University's Mr. Chung, director of the Public Opinion Program at the University of Hong Kong and the city's leading pollster. For the last 15 years he has conducted surveys every six months on how strongly local residents identify as Hong Kong citizens, Chinese citizens, and other permutations.

In December, the Hong Kong citizens score hit a 10-year high, while the Chinese citizens score fell to a 12-year low—almost certainly as a result of vote-rigging in the District Council elections, which local media have tied to the Communist Party's underground organization in in the territory.

Beijing's newspapers in the territory, Wen Wei Po and Ta Kung Pao, promptly accused Mr. Chung of being a "political fraudster" with "evil intentions" to "incite Hong Kong people to deny they are Chinese." One columnist wrote without irony that merely asking people whether they consider themselves Chinese is subversive: "From this we can see that Robert Chung's supposed 'scholarship' is the slave of political dirty money."

The frenzy only intensified after Hao Tiechuan, spokesman for the Central Government Liaison Office, joined in the attacks two weeks ago, calling the survey "unscientific" and "illogical." One columnist suggested obliquely that Mr. Chung should lose his job: "If he lacks even basic common sense, then he is really unfit to continue working in the statistics field."

Mr. Chung rejects the charge of bias and denies meeting last November with a British official who, the Beijing-owned papers claim, is a spy. The professor released a statement that "Cultural Revolution-style curses and defamations, no matter at whom they are directed, are not conducive to the building of Chinese national identity among Hong Kong people."

Then there is Dixon Sing, an associate professor at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. The pro-Beijing media targeted the political scientist last December as an anti-China "Western-trained vicious dog," apparently because he gave interviews to Falun Gong-affiliated media. But his real sin may have been to defend opposition legislators' plan in 2010 to resign and force by-elections that were de facto referenda on democratization. At least two of the approximately 14 attack articles that appeared in the last few months asked the university to fire him.

Mr. Sing says no university administrator has contacted him so far, though as a junior professor he is more vulnerable than Mr. Chung. There is also a worrying precedent: After the pro-Beijing media attacked Ng Chi-sum, a popular radio talk-show host, the government-owned broadcaster Radio Television Hong Kong cancelled his contract effective this month.

Hong Kong is supposed to elect its Chief Executive by universal suffrage in 2017, and if the attacks on Messrs. Chung and Sing are anything to go by, it appears Beijing wants to neuter the opposition along the lines of Vladimir Putin's Russia. But as even Mr. Putin is discovering, that's no easy task.

Beijing would do well to remember that the last time they tried to restrict civil liberties, with the introduction of antisubversion legislation in 2003, more than half a million people turned out on the streets to protest. Chief Executive Tung Chee Hwa and several of his chief officials were eventually forced to resign. Now the Communist Party risks another backlash from a territory that continues to value the rule of law and a modicum of political accountability. Beijing should not count on the people of Hong Kong to surrender these things lightly.

Its funny how the comments made the Chinese officials are so similar to the ones made the Chinese fellas here on the forum when debating about something. Slave, vicious western dogs, the works:lol:
 
.
This is well known in China, nothing news worthy. It is just a loophole taken advantage by rich Chinese to work around China's one child policy. Because of the one-country-two system policy, babies born in Hongkong does not violate the one child rule since they are considered as "hongkong hukou". Personally I think both USA and Hongkong should get rid of this silly anchor mom law.
Whatever frustrated things eagerly to show.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom