What's new

China denies crossing LAC in Ladakh; promises to resolve stand-off amicably

selvan33

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
1,267
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
China denies crossing LAC in Ladakh; promises to resolve stand-off amicably

army.jpg


BEIJING: Although the Chinese government has repeatedly asserted that its forces have not crossed the Line of Actual Control in Ladakh, the Chinese military on Thursday confirmed that it was in communication with the Indian Army to resolve the infiltration controversy.

Chinese officials told TOI that they appreciate the calm and mature response of the Indian foreign ministry, which discussed the problem without calling it an invasion. It's the Indian media, particularly television, which was raking up the issue and forcing New Delhi to take action, the official said.

There are clear signals that China is looking for a face-saving solution to the problem but would not publicly backtrack from its formal position that Chinese troops "have not crossed the line".

"I don't agree with your allegation that it is the Chinese side which provoked confrontation between border troops," ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying told TOI at a regular briefing. However, she went on to say, "We believe this incident can also be properly handled and will not affect peace and stability of border areas as well as the normal development of India China relations."

Hua also said she did not have much information about the proposed visit of minister of external affairs Salman Khurshid's visit to Beijing. Khurshid is expected to visit Beijing on May 9, to be followed by the visit of Chinese premier Li Keqiang to India.

The Chinese foreign ministry seemed to speak in two voices saying the country's troops have not crossed over to the Indian side but also expressing its readiness to discuss what may be a "nonissue".

"With the boundary not demarcated yet, it is inevitable for problems to crop up," Hua said. The ministry, which earlier said the Chinese troops did not cross the LAC, has now replaced 'LAC' with the word 'border'.

A source in New Delhi said the LAC is a more definite line and incursions can be proved while there are differing perceptions about what is the 'border'.

Asked if China was pressuring India to dismantle structures near the border, Hua said, "Since I'm not in the frontier, I don't know the latest development of frontier situation."

"When there is a problem in border areas, the two sides should resolve it through friendly consultations through existing mechanisms and channels," Hua said.
China denies crossing LAC in Ladakh; promises to resolve stand-off amicably - The Times of India
 
well if they dont agree to cross then what DO THEY hope to settle ??? :china:
 
Omar urges centre to up its ante on China incursion
Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Omar Abdullah has urged the central government to give a clear-cut message to China after recent incidents of incursion by its troops into the Indian Territory. Addressing a rally in Kathua district of the state, Abdullah said that the people of Jammu and Kashmir would not accept any kind of intrusion.
[video]http://www.hindustantimes.com/audio-news-video/AV-News/Omar-urges-centre-to-up-its-ante-on-China-incursion/Article2-1050122.aspx[/video]
VIDEOOmar urges centre to up its ante on China incursionAV-News Videos - hindustantimes.com
 
With its worst fears allayed,
New Delhi seems prepared to address Chinese concerns
about aggressive patrolling by Indian troops in the area,
repeated air violations by Indian helicopters and some
constructions including one in
Phukche area whenever the next significant interaction takesplace. While there are no demands for demolition of
structures, the Indian side
could well accommodate some of the Chinese demands on patrolling and air violations, sources indicate. The assessment, shared even
by Indian army which is supposed to be more realistic
in its assessment about the
Chinese and their intent,
coincided with clear signs that both countries could be
seeking a de-escalation in
eastern Ladakh.


India could agree to China demands on patrols - TOI Mobile | The Times of India Mobile Site
 
Military sources said India is flying UAVs over Ladakh where it claims China has crossed the Line of Actual Control (LAC) even as external affairs minister confirmed his visit to the country on May 9.

China on Thursday said it did not provoke any confrontation along the LAC, reiterating that its troops have always acted in compliance with treaties.
Khurshid said he would go to Beijing ahead of Chinese premier Li Keqiang’s visit to India on May 20. The minister also expressed confidence about a peaceful resolution to the stand-off.


Hopes for an early breakthrough have arisen with Beijing confirming the visit of a high-level team.

The advance security liaison team is scheduled to arrive in New Delhi on April 30 to work out the logistics of Li’s visit. Top government sources said there appears to be growing realisation in Beijing that a long face-off with India, its seventh largest trading partner, could be counterproductive.

Army chief Bikram Singh, updated defence minister AK Antony on Thursday on the developments


Army flies UAVs over Ladakh; visits on track - Hindustan Times
 
what is Mc Cartney or Mc Donald line??

522px-Kashmir_map_big.jpg

In the 1890s Britain and China were allies and Britain was principally concerned that Aksai Chin not fall into Russian hands.[8] In 1899, when China showed an interest in Aksai Chin, Britain proposed a revised boundary, initially suggested by George Macartney,[9] which put most of Aksai Chin in Chinese territory.[8] This border, along the Karakoram Mountains, was proposed and supported by British officials for a number of reasons. The Karakoram Mountains formed a natural boundary, which would set the British borders up to the Indus River watershed while leaving the Tarim River watershed in Chinese control, and Chinese control of this tract would present a further obstacle to Russian advance in Central Asia.[10] The British presented this line to the Chinese in a Note by Sir Claude MacDonald.
 
Back
Top Bottom