China and India: Aircraft Carrier Plans Advance

[danger007]

1. Because that AC never came to Indian hands. BTW your beloved liaoning also imported.
2. Same goes to you also. China imports it and then reverse engineered it and then mass produces it. That's why no one gives high tech military equipment to china.
3. Then who is operating Virat and Who were operated vikramaditya. And Chinese are very much professionals.
4. Then who is making IAC-1. A chinese shipyard!!!

madam you should read his previous post... have you seen the floating casino?

 

[drunken-monke]

it is not yindoo..it is hindu..but it is not hindu also..it is India since Hindu is one of the religions in India..

Simply one word..... Correct......

 

[Dash]

Congrats, the price for the most nonsensical comments goes to you.

You surely must have missed that India operates carriers successfully for + 5 decades.

Do giv it to him for reverse engeneering and then call it Chinese..

 

[selvan33]

1. Because that AC never came to Indian hands. BTW your beloved liaoning also imported.
2. Same goes to you also. China imports it and then reverse engineered it and then mass produces it. That's why no one gives high tech military equipment to china.
3. Then who is operating Virat and Who were operated vikramaditya. And Chinese are very much professionals.
4. Then who is making IAC-1. A chinese shipyard!!!

Hey buddy why are you replying those non sense trolls. Just ignore him.

 

[soumya1989]

Hey buddy why are you replying those non sense trolls. Just ignore him.

I will do it. I know few of them like hongwu/ jammy/ idune etc etc

 

[koushik]

Indians don't even know how to operate their Russian imported carrier. The thing is India cannot make their components so they rely on Russia for everything. Russians even trained the Indians. I highly doubt the Indian military has the professionalism to operate a carrier. Indian military is a very unprofessional military. India certainly don't have the capability to make their own carrier, that's impossible for India.

The IN had inducted INS Vikrant ( ex HMS Hercules) back in '61 and it played a crucial role in the 1971 war...then comes INS Viraat which has been in IN since 1986 and is still in service..
The Indian Navy operates ACCs sincethe last 5 decades.....and it has been operating ACCs way before China even came to know about a ship named Varyag
This clearly verifies the fact that IN has a vast experience in operating ACCs...
So please get some sense bro....and in case my english doesnt get in your head...convert it to chinese and read it.....but dont post like a dumb..

Indians don't even know how to operate their Russian imported carrier. The thing is India cannot make their components so they rely on Russia for everything. Russians even trained the Indians. I highly doubt the Indian military has the professionalism to operate a carrier. Indian military is a very unprofessional military. India certainly don't have the capability to make their own carrier, that's impossible for India.

The IN had inducted INS Vikrant ( ex HMS Hercules) back in '61 and it played a crucial role in the 1971 war...then comes INS Viraat which has been in IN since 1986 and is still in service..
The Indian Navy operates ACCs sincethe last 5 decades.....and it has been operating ACCs way before China even came to know about a ship named Varyag
This clearly verifies the fact that IN has a vast experience in operating ACCs...
So please get some sense bro....and in case my english doesnt get in your head...convert it to chinese and read it.....but dont post like a dumb..

 

[--,-'{@]

The IN had inducted INS Vikrant ( ex HMS Hercules) back in '61 and it played a crucial role in the 1971 war...then comes INS Viraat which has been in IN since 1986 and is still in service..
The Indian Navy operates ACCs sincethe last 5 decades.....and it has been operating ACCs way before China even came to know about a ship named Varyag
This clearly verifies the fact that IN has a vast experience in operating ACCs...
So please get some sense bro....and in case my english doesnt get in your head...convert it to chinese and read it.....but dont post like a dumb..



The IN had inducted INS Vikrant ( ex HMS Hercules) back in '61 and it played a crucial role in the 1971 war...then comes INS Viraat which has been in IN since 1986 and is still in service..
The Indian Navy operates ACCs sincethe last 5 decades.....and it has been operating ACCs way before China even came to know about a ship named Varyag
This clearly verifies the fact that IN has a vast experience in operating ACCs...
So please get some sense bro....and in case my english doesnt get in your head...convert it to chinese and read it.....but dont post like a dumb..

guys hez nt Chinese so plz do nt bring China into mud slinging. he is just a psycho who needs multiple operations hence "phycops".

 

[koushik]

guys hez nt Chinese so plz do nt bring China into mud slinging. he is just a psycho who needs multiple operations hence "phycops".

Roger that mate..!!
Best option is to just avoid him.....!! His name sounds like a guy sufferin from Psychosis...

 

[kurup]

^^ yes we need at least 18 DE subs and 5 SSBNs

What is a DE sub ??

 

[selvan33]

What is a DE sub ??

Diesel electric.

 

[soumya1989]

madam you should read his previous post... have you seen the floating casino?

sorry mate I am not madam. I am sir. BTW you can call me Soumya

 

[sancho]

The funny thing is, all this pitting the Chinese carrier and subs against India is mainly nonsense, since their main threat is countering US carriers, S. Korean and Japanese navies in the east. Just like in Indias defence policy, the carrier is primarily meant as an addition to coastal protection, the force projection to greater distances and in higher numbers is a long shot for both sides.

 

[Roybot]

Indians don't even know how to operate their Russian imported carrier. The thing is India cannot make their components so they rely on Russia for everything. Russians even trained the Indians. I highly doubt the Indian military has the professionalism to operate a carrier. Indian military is a very unprofessional military. India certainly don't have the capability to make their own carrier, that's impossible for India.

Ever heard of Pronoun?

Only a Pakistani can be this obsessed with India. You have exposed yourself son.

 

[koushik]

The funny thing is, all this pitting the Chinese carrier and subs against India is mainly nonsense, since their main threat is countering US carriers, S. Korean and Japanese navies in the east. Just like in Indias defence policy, the carrier is primarily meant as an addition to coastal protection, the force projection to greater distances and in higher numbers is a long shot for both sides.

Yeah correct..!!
And as far as India is concerned.....the latest acquisition and planning of carrier is essentially a part of the Navy's standard expansion plan that it has stated in order to transform the Navy into a more potent, efficient and blue water Navy.......

 

[armchairPrivate]

Looks like IN has acquired an armored luxury cruise ship for wife swapping parties - AHOY!