China aims to capture Arunachal Pradesh/Southern Tibet in next 10-15 years

[MH.Yang]

Officially we will ofcourse claim Aksai Chin until a treaty is signed by both sides. I am just telling you the prevailing Indian sentiment that we are willing to settle with what we have.

This is the prevailing Indian sentiment.

 

[Shehryar Ashraf]

I frankly disagree with the title
it is not 10-15 years.
it will be done within 5 years

 

[magra]

This is the prevailing Indian sentiment.


View attachment 777587

You cannot stop some people to have dreams. Like some ppl in Pak have dreams of Ghazwa-e-Hind, some Chinese have dreams over entire South China Sea etc.

 

[Wood]

This time plan gives a window for India to make up for the depleted fighter strength in IAF. At the very least, India can then be paper ready to defend.

The optimistic plan also seems to assume that China will not have any significant fallout from the other two military campaigns that are supposed to precede the conflict with India. It is reasonable for India to expect a fail in this assumption.

 

[vishwambhar]

We can play the waiting game for the coming few decades. After that, we would be too big and powerful for any nation to take head on.

Yes with trillions of $$$ in reserve.... Let China entertain us with army video drills till then

 

[Rollno21]

China can aim a lot but the question is does the Chinese have it in them to do that ? And that's a million dollar question.

 

[SIPRA]

You cannot stop some people to have dreams. Like some ppl in Pak have dreams of Ghazwa-e-Hind, some Chinese have dreams over entire South China Sea etc.

I have read in detail, how China-India border dispute evolved, right from 1949 thru 1962, including the views of Indian intellectuals, journalists, politicians and military officers, of those times. I hardly notice a difference, in these views, over the time, till date. Though, even at that time, there were occasional and rare voices in India, who suggested Nehru to go for negotiated settlement, instead of adopting "Forward Policy".

 

[magra]

Chinese aim/focus with slant eyes. It is hard to know where the focus is. May be they are looking at moon, sun or mars as they were existed during Ming, ching dynasty time.

Lets focus only on policies rather than facial features. By doing so, you are also insulting our North East Indians who have similar features.

 

[SuperStar20]

Lets focus only on policies rather than facial features. By doing so, you are also insulting our North East Indians who have similar features.

Sure, deleted my post. Thanks

 

[MultaniGuy]

China conducting war drills in Tibet recently and building 30 airports and new highways along Tibet/Arunachal Pradesh. In addition to that they have built villages inside of Arunachal Pradesh and moving more of their population into the area. This will be one of the biggest geo-political challenges for India in the years to come. With the fall of the Ghani government in Afghanistan the region as a whole is becoming more hostile to India. The China-India border skirmish we saw in 2020-2021 was simply a test by generals sitting in Beijing, a warm up for what is to come.

VIRAL In China: Beijing Will Conquer Taiwan By 2025, India's Arunachal Pradesh By 2040 -- Experts

An article published in 2013 by the Chinese website Sohu is going viral on social media. The article explains how Beijing will settle score with their neighbors and re-conquer lost territories which include Taiwan and India. Why US F-16 Pilots Were Ordered To Ram Their Aircraft Into A Passenger...

eurasiantimes.com

China Launches 'All-Out Offensive' With Attack Helicopters, Artillery On ‘Blue Army’ Near LAC: Watch

The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) recently conducted large-scale drills in the snowy plateau of Tibet bordering India. This Snowfield Duty-2021 exercise took place 4,500 meters above sea level and involved more than 10 brigades and regiments. ‘Hanging In Air’: Why US-India Deal On...

eurasiantimes.com

‘Construction in our own territory’: China on Arunachal village report

The Chinese foreign ministry was responding to the report based on satellite imagery, which showed rows of houses in Indian territory that has been under Chinese control since 1959, and which is disputed.

www.hindustantimes.com

China will only go to war when China has an absolute and comparative advantage against India.
Pakistan would definitely join in to share the spoils of war.

I have a feeling we will come close to that.

China conducting war drills in Tibet recently and building 30 airports and new highways along Tibet/Arunachal Pradesh. In addition to that they have built villages inside of Arunachal Pradesh and moving more of their population into the area. This will be one of the biggest geo-political challenges for India in the years to come. With the fall of the Ghani government in Afghanistan the region as a whole is becoming more hostile to India. The China-India border skirmish we saw in 2020-2021 was simply a test by generals sitting in Beijing, a warm up for what is to come.

VIRAL In China: Beijing Will Conquer Taiwan By 2025, India's Arunachal Pradesh By 2040 -- Experts

An article published in 2013 by the Chinese website Sohu is going viral on social media. The article explains how Beijing will settle score with their neighbors and re-conquer lost territories which include Taiwan and India. Why US F-16 Pilots Were Ordered To Ram Their Aircraft Into A Passenger...

eurasiantimes.com

China Launches 'All-Out Offensive' With Attack Helicopters, Artillery On ‘Blue Army’ Near LAC: Watch

The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) recently conducted large-scale drills in the snowy plateau of Tibet bordering India. This Snowfield Duty-2021 exercise took place 4,500 meters above sea level and involved more than 10 brigades and regiments. ‘Hanging In Air’: Why US-India Deal On...

eurasiantimes.com

‘Construction in our own territory’: China on Arunachal village report

The Chinese foreign ministry was responding to the report based on satellite imagery, which showed rows of houses in Indian territory that has been under Chinese control since 1959, and which is disputed.

www.hindustantimes.com

I too am of the opinion that negotiations will not resolve the Kashmir dispute, Aksai Chin in China's case, and South Tibet/Arunachal Pradesh.

The arrogance of India sickens me.
Besides that India can never win a two front war against China and Pakistan.

indians are so much unsecured . always they have fear of someone

Yes and the Indians were humiliated in the 1962 war which China defeated India.

 

[MH.Yang]

Imagine a mid-level nation like UK / France getting it but nations like Germany , Japan and India kept out.
UN needs a reform where no nations get permanent position or veto power.

And you think Britain and France are just a medium-sized country?
Have you never considered Britain's influence in the Commonwealth and Britain's influence in the financial industry?
Do you know the influence of France in Africa? France is also a representative of the European Union.
Ignorance, arrogance.
Britain and France are indeed at the same level as the USA, China and Russia.
As for the three countries you mentioned, they are not qualified.

 

[MultaniGuy]

And you think Britain and France are just a medium-sized country?
Have you never considered Britain's influence in the Commonwealth and Britain's influence in the financial industry?
Do you know the influence of France in Africa? France is also a representative of the European Union.
Ignorance, arrogance.
Britain and France are indeed at the same level as the USA, China and Russia.
As for the three countries you mentioned, they are not qualified.

China would never allow reform of the United Nations.
China would lose its prestigious position of United Nations permanent member.
United Nations is a prestigious club of the winners of World War 2
As for the losers of World War 2, the world doesn't give a damn for them.

 

[MH.Yang]

China would never allow reform of the United Nations.
China would lose its prestigious position of United Nations permanent member.
United Nations is a prestigious club of the winners of World War 2
As for the losers of World War 2, the world doesn't give a damn for them.

The Chinese govt does not reject the reform of the UN or even the abolition of the veto (in fact, the core rights of the P5 are the right to propose proposals and the right to compulsory action, not the veto). However, the Chinese govt does not allow to continue to increase the number of permanent members with veto power. The Chinese govt's position on UN reform can be obtained through Google.
India has applied for permanent membership six times, but they can not even get the support of 129 countries in the UN General Assembly. China has not rejected India's application, nor does it need to reject India's application. Because India is even unable to put the proposal on the table of the Chinese representative.

 

[doorstar]

Imagine a mid-level nation like UK / France getting it but nations like Germany , Japan and India kept out.

UN needs a reform where no nations get permanent position or veto power.

study the aftermath of WW2 and you might learn as to why US, UK, Russia, China, France have the status they have and about the insignificance of India too.

btw why would the Allies have given the same status as themselves to Germans and the japs whom they had just finished thrashing/defeating?

 

[MH.Yang]

Many people have misunderstandings. They believe that the P5 can block the UN resolution because it has the veto power. In fact, on the contrary, because they have the ability to block UN resolutions, the UN agrees that they have the veto power to avoid unnecessary consumption by P5.
Therefore, whether to cancel the veto power of P5 will not actually affect the ability of P5.
The core right of P5 comes from the right to make proposals, which means that without P5 to make proposals, any opinions will not be discussed by UN, which is the special right to P5 can use the name and power of UN.
P5 also has the right of compulsory action, which means that P5 can legally use force without UN authorization.

The reason why I say that Japan and India are not eligible to become permanent members is that the United Nations can implement resolutions in East Asia without Japan, and the United Nations can implement resolutions in the Indian Ocean without India.
Since they are dispensable, why give them rights? Because India bought French Rafale?