Indian Punjabi Population : 44,000,000
Pakistani Punjabi population: 93,500,000
Pakistani Sindhi Population : 35,700,000
Indian Sindhi population: 3,810,000
Indian kashmiri population: 12,541,302
Pakistani kashmiri population: 2,580,000 and Gilgit-Baltistan is 870,347
I am not even counting those Urdu speaking muhajirs who migrated from india and still has some relatives in there.
Are Pakistani pashtun any different to afghan pashtuns when have same tribes exist in boht countries Pakistan and Afghanistan? You are confusing nationality with ethnic groups which are two different identity. I am saying that Pakistan and India both host different ethnic groups so differences vary from one ethnic group to others rather than one country to others. Different ethnicities of Pakistan got united under the banner of Islam to create this country we call Pakistan..
What are differences beside religion?
That still doesnt change the fact that Punjabis form only
2% of Indians and Sindhis form only
0.3% (realistic estimate) of Indians. Please do count Mohajirs as well since they form only 6% of Pakistanis. It doesnt change anything. About Pashtuns, there are more Pashtuns in Pakistan than almost the entire population of Afghanistan (which includes not only Pashtuns but Tajiks, Hazaras, Uzbeks etc.). Afghan Pashtuns are known to speak Dari as well and have many Afghan specific tribes such as Karzai, Ghilzai and Barakzai etc.
I am not denying that we totally seperate. You havent read my comment above, I guess. I agree that we have different ethnicities all settled on the Indus, part of its history and culture and therefore are one nation. There are way more Punjabis in Pakistan than India and way more Pashtuns in Pakistan than Afghanistan, so that shouldnt matter at all. Such similarities are only natural to be found in neighbouring countries. Infact, it would be weird if we didnt have any similarities at all, since that is not how the world works. They are found between the French and Italian, Germans and English, Chinese and Japanese as well.
As for the differences, I stated that they are
genealogically different, but you missed that again. The fact that we are
ethnically (proved by the Harappa DNA Project, link given above by Kaptaan),
linguistically (explained in detail by me in an earlier comment, refer to it),
culturally (Punjabi/Pashtun/Sindhi/Baloch culture vs Bihari/Bengalee/Tamil/Marathi culture) and, which was the entire point of the article,
historically (united for only 80 years under Buddhist Ashoka and later 500 or so under foreign Mughal/Turkic rule and 98 under British - different civilizations and kingdoms, already explained in excruciating detail in earlier, comments please read them) different than Indians still holds.