What's new

Chengdu J-20 5th Generation Aircraft News & Discussions

.
This looks like a TVC assisted maneuver out of a falling flat spin at low altitude.


Heavy engines, lighter / stealthier airframe with composites, no loadout and light fuel, you'd see the agility. Plus, the canards as is will give it agility. With a full loadout, it will be difficult to point to anyone's six without the TVC. It will be needed in case of a faceoff.
 
Last edited:
. .
Good, I can suggest this in their thread when others guessed B-2, H-20

It takes tremendously amount of fanboyism to believe China would fly her top secret prototype bomber in a contested airspace like South China sea.
 
. .
Heavy engines, lighter / stealthier airframe with composites, no loadout and light fuel, you'd see the agility. Plus, the canards as is will give it agility. With a full loadout, it will be difficult to point to anyone's six without the TVC. It will be needed in case of a faceoff.

Yes TVC is important for dogfight and also high altitude maneuvering especially when flying fast. Also the J-20 will be perfect if fitted a gun.
It takes tremendously amount of fanboyism to believe China would fly her top secret prototype bomber in a contested airspace like South China sea.

Definitely not the prototype, at least production model where everything is proven and working such as J-20B/C
 
.
Yes TVC is important for dogfight and also high altitude maneuvering especially when flying fast. Also the J-20 will be perfect if fitted a gun.

That's a horrible idea to take a large strike jet and put a gun for it for a dog fight. The stealth tier should never come to a situation for a dog fight. For that, the USAF would move up the -15 and -16's. Similarly, the Chinese would probably put the J-10's, J-11's, and J-16's for that role.
 
. . .
That's a horrible idea to take a large strike jet and put a gun for it for a dog fight. The stealth tier should never come to a situation for a dog fight. For that, the USAF would move up the -15 and -16's. Similarly, the Chinese would probably put the J-10's, J-11's, and J-16's for that role.

Never underestimate the requirement of having gun on fighter. If there's a B-2 about to enter cruise missile effective range and your J-20 ran out of PL-10 while PL-15 can't track, you can still destroy the B-2 using gun. Also if J-20 is up against F-22 and missiles don't work due to stealth, the gun is all you can count on. J-20 & F-22 never met in combat, both won't know if their missiles would be able to hit each other.
 
.
Never underestimate the requirement of having gun on fighter. If there's a B-2 about to enter cruise missile effective range and your J-20 ran out of PL-10 while PL-15 can't track, you can still destroy the B-2 using gun. Also if J-20 is up against F-22 and missiles don't work due to stealth, the gun is all you can count on. J-20 & F-22 never met in combat, both won't know if their missiles would be able to hit each other.

This is fundamental difference in how the US strategists think and others. Your J-20 or B1, etc, should never be in a position to requiring a gun. If that ever could happen, that immediately means that your Tier I, II and support / backup aircraft have all been destroyed. So then your one jet won't see any different of a fat, even IF it had a weapon. Weapons are created per strategies, strategies are created to counter scenarios and situations, these jets are not created for a dog fight like an F-16 or F-16 would do. That's a billion dollars being put at risk to be quickly wasted. A race car, a truck and a bus are designed for VERY different applications in life. They can't be the same.
 
. .
.
From all the info I've been reading, it doesn't look like WS-15 would be ready before 2023.
What info is that? And ready as in ready for production or ready for flight testing?
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom