grey boy 2
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2009
- Messages
- 6,484
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
J-20 updates (pictures from the September 26 test flight part 1)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm wondering if China gonna introduce the 2D vector nuzzle into this aircraft.
You really cannot blame those who keeps on posting those pictures because they can do nothing else. They have no relevant experience to explain to the readers as to why an aircraft does this at so and so attitude at so and so altitude because of so and so situation.I think I'm suffering from 'appreciation fatigue' of the J-20 where one just get used to looking at pictures of the same thing over and over again. I want to see J-31 flying soon to have something new to look at
Suffered the same problem with J-10 and J-11. I discovered J-10 ~3 years ago and at first it was pretty interesting. (Even J-8 was interesting when I first found it)
One of the J-20 prototypes have reached CFTE.
That is J-15 not J-20.
Or a 'mishap'. Now THAT will start the whole speculation thing as well as trolling behaviors going again.If they shoot photos of something new, like weapon testing, high altitude flying, flying over new terrains/ in formations etc then it will be interesting again.
How do you know tell me what is the drag to weight ratio of the f-22, the F-35 man there's a lot orders in it.Wake me up when the F-22 don't suffocate the pilot.
It's unproven in battle and far inferior to the J-20.
F-22 is another American media hyped propaganda equipment.
J-31 is now VASTLY superior to the F-35 which is so crap many countries don't even want it.
I think now we are ahead of the US in 5th generation technology.
US had the lead, but now is falling behind china just like they are economically.
You really cannot blame those who keeps on posting those pictures because they can do nothing else. They have no relevant experience to explain to the readers as to why an aircraft does this at so and so attitude at so and so altitude because of so and so situation.
It also depends on the subject as well. If an aircraft is an exhibit of newly discovered aerodynamic principles, then we would have aerodynamicists going ga-ga over the tiniest structure and speculations -- some legit and some not -- abounds. That is not the case here. Am no aerodynamicist but a sensory and avionics specialist and it is difficult enough for the interested lay readers to visualize air flow at several hundreds km/h, let alone electromagnetic behaviors that occurs at speed of light. So the only thing we can do is seek out foundational principles of the subject to reduce some of the technical fog, if not outright dispel them. Unfortunately for real science, these guys have no relevant experience in the EM spectrum either.