siegecrossbow
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2010
- Messages
- 7,414
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
lala what are you saying?
What is the point of posting such a poor quality image? What is new or unique that warrants this poor quality?
@Deino Valentine’s Day present from the city of Shantou.
@kungfugymnast if you are specifically talking about J-10CE in Pakistan context then you are slightly wrong we do not need an aircraft with 8 A2A missiles load out [4-6 BVR and 2-4 WVR missiles] what we need is an multi role fighter which should be more orientated towards the Strike Role so IMHO any aircraft with 2+2 A2A missiles with capability to carry +4 stand-off striking weapons will be suitable for our arising need to replace Mirage-III/V jets in PAF which lacks BVR capability which PAF use in strike role
So J-10C 'partially' fulfil our needs in its current configuration even without any enhancement with TVC engine or capability to carry additional BVRs.
I hope this will end the unnecessary argument between you and @Deino about tweaking or modifying J-10 for export in reference of Pakistan Air Force.
Able to carry 6-8 air to air missiles doesn't mean it can't carry air to ground missiles and bombs. It can still carry blue arrow missiles or 500-700lb bombs on double or triple racks, single large air to ground missiles or 1000lb bombs. Don't jump to conclusion before you see the actual J-10CE caters for export market preference.
No, it cannot at least not in the current form since the blue arrow missiles are nor certified and even less how shall a J-10 carry additional "500-700lb bombs on double or triple racks, single large air to ground missiles or 1000lb bombs" when it already carries 6-8 AAMS and the always mounted external fuel tanks??
So again it is only you against anything we've seen and expect to see, who jumps "to conclusion".