What's new

Chengdu J-10 Multirole Fighter Air Craft News & Discussions

I would change to question to the contrary: Why should it be when it was NOT capable of supercruise with the original AL-31FN?

WS-10 has a higher by-pass ratio than the AL-31FN. It trades off high speed performance for greater maximum thrust.
 
WS-10 has a higher by-pass ratio than the AL-31FN. It trades off high speed performance for greater maximum thrust.


But is this marginal increase relevant since thrust alone is not the important factor to supercruise?
 
J-10C
1c697a5565c3220c120335.jpg
1c697a5565c3220c121336.jpg
1c697a5565c3220c121a37.jpg
 
very impressive pirctures of J-10C. I wish Pakistan to have at least 100 of these J-10C in their Pakistan Air Force. Here in Canada, a Canadian retired pilot friend told me that J-10C is a powerful,advance multifeature, comprehensive jet fighter to fight better against latest major jet fighters like Su, Sukhoi, Mig , F22, F16, Eurofighter , Gripon and Rafale.
 
Last edited:
J-10SH
微信图片_20210519220555.jpg
微信图片_20210519220606.jpg
微信图片_20210519220632.jpg
微信图片_20210519220642.jpg

Via @东海舰队发布 from Weixin
 
It's a pity the A model cannot be upgraded to the C model due to different fuselage. Hopefully PLAN gets the C model and phases out the A model over the coming years.


Nope ... hopefully the PLAN retires all its old J-10AH models and replaces them with more J-15 and J-16H.
 
Nope ... hopefully the PLAN retires all its old J-10AH models and replaces them with more J-15 and J-16H.

J-10C has better serviceability and takes up less space than J-16. On naval aviation bases that is a plus.
 
Are no more 2 seater being produced? They all seem to be of A type with non-DSI intakes.
 
J-10C has better serviceability and takes up less space than J-16. On naval aviation bases that is a plus.


No, for the PLAN land-based operations this size issue is no issue but the J-10's limited range and weapons load is especially for naval operations a huge plus for a pure-Flanker fleet.
 
J-10AS and J-10SH
001SX8hXly1gqow5natpmj61900u04qw02.jpg
001SX8hXly1gqow5nk82dj61900u0kjl02.jpg

Via @央广军事 from Weibo
 
J10AH0528
001SX8hXly1gqq2lymvs0j61900u0b2d02.jpg
001SX8hXly1gqq2m2yu5pj61900u0u0y02.jpg
001SX8hXly1gqq2m1tocbj61900u0npf02.jpg
001SX8hXly1gqq2ly2x5uj61900u0hdu02.jpg
001SX8hXly1gqq2loffg4j61hc0u0niv02.jpg
001SX8hXly1gqq2m30i34j61900u0e8102.jpg
001SX8hXly1gqq2m10zodj61900u01kz02.jpg

Via @央广军事 from Weibo
 
Are no more 2 seater being produced? They all seem to be of A type with non-DSI intakes.
@Deino ?
 
Are no more 2 seater being produced? They all seem to be of A type with non-DSI intakes.
Unlikely to see a new twin seater J10C, as there is no requirement.

Twin seater J10's main role is pilot conversion, i.e. to to convert a certified pilot from another aircraft type (ex J7, J8, JL9 and others) to J10. The twin seater J10 seen to be able to satisfy conversion to J10A/B/C with-out any hitch. Thus It does not matter the type conversion twin seater J10 is same as J10A spec and with non-DSI air intake.

Conversion training usually last only a few months, and with may be 70 to 80 hours flight time. Thereafter the pilot concerned will switch over to single seat J10A/B/C.

An anology in Chinese flankers - the old twin seater SU-27UBK bought some 20 years ago (along with the now retired PLAAF SU-27SK) is still doing the type conversion for pilots who will be taking control of J11B despite the difference between J11B and SU-27SK/J11A.

A conversion trainer need not have exact spec as the aircraft which the newly converted pilot will command.
 
I just posted some articles on J-10C with the domestically developed WS-10 Taihang engine at the "Chinese Aero Engine information thread", please read them there :-)


- China’s J-10 comes of age with indigenous engine
By Greg Waldron | FlightGlobal - 21 May 2021

- PLA’s J-10C fighter makes training debut with domestically made engine: reports
By Liu Xuanzun | Global Times - 13 May 2021
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom