Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I THINK we should forget F16s n concentrate on J10 n other options
^ Agreed that F-16 is more mature and capable platform. But isn't J-10 cheaper/being sold by a trustworthy ally? Can the cost benefit analysis hold sway for acquiring many J-10 with no strings compared to very few F-16 with more strings than a cobweb?
^ Agreed that F-16 is more mature and capable platform. But isn't J-10 cheaper/being sold by a trustworthy ally? Can the cost benefit analysis hold sway for acquiring many J-10 with no strings compared to very few F-16 with more strings than a cobweb?
why not we go for rafale
With 60 Million a Price, 126 will and can come under 10-12 Billion program
its total cost including traning parts systems jets and much more needs for opraete them will be realy 90mn$ per unit its not car you buy and drive see only wapens system of each cost moere then 10mn$
why not we go for rafale why we need same f 16 yes f 16 is good without any doubt but we need to be going forward look at iaf they will get EF200 pak-fa and su 30
and where we are same old crap we need rafale+J10 and 20 to 25 f 16 thats all
that still comes to round about $12.5 billion - good enough . also Imran I have not taken into account that price per unit will come down when serial production is increased.
Any further clarification , pls mention on MRCA thread , this one is for J-10 I think