Central Asia : Worst military genocide and rape of Caucasoid by Mongoloid

[Joe Shearer]

@Joe Shearer


Joe once explained how an ancient proto-Turkic people resided in modern day central Asia and Xinjiang region called the Tocharians. These people had a Caucasoid phenotype not a Mongoloid one. Archaeologist found mummified remains which provided evidence of their exoskeleton which closely resembled that of Caucasoid people, and red hair samples were also found.

It is not sure that they were proto-Turkic. They were Caucasoid, and spoke an Indo-European language, strangely enough, not an Indo-Iranian one. Somebody mentions the Kushans. The Tocharians were ruled by several clans, one of which was the Moon Clan, the Yueh Chi, or Kushan.

 

[Sugarcane]

@Joe Shearer uncle - Nice to see you alive & live

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Original people of Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan

Many of the Uzbeks and Turkmen retained features of original Central Asians but many were heavily effected in some areas

Especially Uzbeks who were effected by both Turkic and Mongol

The original Kushans of Afghanistans, were also a Central Asian tribe.

The Hazara are descendants of Mongol armies and Tajik or Balochi
They claim to be descendants of Mongol and Genghis Khan although some Hazara prefer to call themsels the original inhabitants known as Kushans

Dumbarse see the map again... Hazaras are in the north of afghanistan ... Baluch is the extreme south bordering ancient sub continent and Persia... even our languages,customs,facial features,traditions are different than them...the Hazaras tht live in Pakistan arent the real native of those areas but settlers...
P.S:Its baluch not balochi... baluchi or balochi is our language!!!

 

[Leader]

one thing is for sure, Mongols were quite ta'ttay (punjabi word, for having high sexual desire, not the organ you are thinking) !

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

one thing is for sure, Mongols were quite ta'ttay (punjabi word, for having high sexual desire, not the organ you are thinking) !

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

one thing is for sure, Mongols were quite ta'ttay (punjabi word, for having high sexual desire, not the organ you are thinking) !

 

[Dandpatta]

My take on this is that in the US, Europe, Australia, Canada, UK and most western countries , the caucasoid men desire East Asian (read, Mongoloid) women . In the US alone, there is an increasing number of Asian women with men of other races and Chinese, Vietnamese, Korean and Filipina women rank high on the 'ideal Asian woman' chart.

So the point is, the Mongol race might be wiping out the caucasoids in Central Asia, but in the west , Mongoloid women are being mated with.

 

[ManUNITEDglory]

My take on this is that in the US, Europe, Australia, Canada, UK and most western countries , the caucasoid men desire East Asian (read, Mongoloid) women . In the US alone, there is an increasing number of Asian women with men of other races and Chinese, Vietnamese, Korean and Filipina women rank high on the 'ideal Asian woman' chart.

So the point is, the Mongol race might be wiping out the caucasoids in Central Asia, but in the west , Mongoloid women are being mated with.

Genocide and Intermarriage is two different things. Mongols genocide, rape, forced slaves women to married them. It wasn't just Caucasoid women there was also Mongoloid/Caucasoid women


Here is the U.S interracial marriage census

Asian/White marriage

36764 Chinese American men married white women.
112665 Chinese american women married white men

28388 Japanese American men married white women
80788 Japanese American women married white men

34823 Filipino American men married white women
164160 Filipino American women married white men

14066 Korean American men married white women
85766 Korean American women married white men

8391 Vietnamese American men married to white women
30418 Vietnamese American women married to white men



Asian/Hispanic marriages

4949 Chinese men / Latino Hispanic women
6993 Chinese women / Latino Hispanic women


4983 Japanese men / Latino Hispanic women
6784 Japanese women / Latino Hispanic women

12320 Filpino men / Latino Hispanic women
22496 Filpino women / Latino Hispanic women


2259 Korean men / Latino Hispanic women
4563 Korean women / Latino Hispanic women

1498 Vietnamese men / Latino Hispanic women
2912 Vietnamese women / Latino Hispanic women

 

[Targon]

Well, when the Mongols came there wasn't any Iranian steppe nomads remained anyway.

 

[Charon]

Well, when the Mongols came there wasn't any Iranian steppe nomads remained anyway.

That's true. I'm 100 % sure that the Scythians in Central Asia were absorbed and assimilated by the Turkic expansion. It seems that Scythians disappeared from Central Asia since the Gökturks appeared in the 6th century. But the cities which were attacked and invaded by the Mongols like Merv in Turkmenistan or Bukhara and Samarkand in modern Uzbekistan were predominantly Perso-Islamic. The Persian presence in Cental Asia was already weakened by Turks but the Mongols gave them the ultimate deathblow.

 

[Targon]

I have doubts about the Iranian residents of these cities and town being from nomad stock, they had nothing with nomad culture I think they were more like Persian settlers.

 

[victor07]

Recent studies in Russia on similar topic show the following results.
new.chronologia.org/volume10/turin_mongoly.php

Haplogroup C can serve as a reliable marker-indicator of the event "13th century Mongol conquest" of territories in Europe, Iran and the Caucasus. As for haplogroup O it is also clear that it should be included to the list of markers-indicators of event "Mongol conquest of the 13th century." Also haplogroup D should be considered as a possible marker-indicator.
Corresponding frequences in % among ethnic populations are presented in the following table:

Population	D	C*	O3c	C3c
Mongols	1.5	33.8	1.5	20
Kyrgyz	-	7.3	-	12.2
Uigurs	-	15.2	-	3
Kazakhs	2.6	10.5	-	64.2
Uzbeks	3.6	14.3	-	-
Tadzhiks	-	-	-	9.1
Kalmyks	-	-	-	24
Bashkirs	-	-	1	2.3
Cr.Tatars	-	4	4	9
Nogais	-	-	-	10

Turkmens, Kurds, Georgians, Osetins, Lezgins, Azerbaijanis, Armenians - no.
Turkish population of Istanbul has 4.6% of haplogroup C. Probably they are the descendants of Nogais and Crimean Tatars.
At the same time currently Mongols have 9.2% of haplogroup R1a1 widespread in Eastern/Central Europe and Central Asia.

 

[ManUNITEDglory]

Recent studies in Russia on similar topic show the following results.
new.chronologia.org/volume10/turin_mongoly.php

Haplogroup C can serve as a reliable marker-indicator of the event "13th century Mongol conquest" of territories in Europe, Iran and the Caucasus. As for haplogroup O it is also clear that it should be included to the list of markers-indicators of event "Mongol conquest of the 13th century." Also haplogroup D should be considered as a possible marker-indicator.
Corresponding frequences in % among ethnic populations are presented in the following table:

Population	D	C*	O3c	C3c
Mongols	1.5	33.8	1.5	20
Kyrgyz	-	7.3	-	12.2
Uigurs	-	15.2	-	3
Kazakhs	2.6	10.5	-	64.2
Uzbeks	3.6	14.3	-	-
Tadzhiks	-	-	-	9.1
Kalmyks	-	-	-	24
Bashkirs	-	-	1	2.3
Cr.Tatars	-	4	4	9
Nogais	-	-	-	10

Turkmens, Kurds, Georgians, Osetins, Lezgins, Azerbaijanis, Armenians - no.
Turkish population of Istanbul has 4.6% of haplogroup C. Probably they are the descendants of Nogais and Crimean Tatars.
At the same time currently Mongols have 9.2% of haplogroup R1a1 widespread in Eastern/Central Europe and Central Asia.

This table is not accurate, should include all the Mongoloid and Caucasoid haplogroup.

Mongoloid Y-DNA C3, C3c , O3 , O3c , D1 , D3, Q, N


For example the Kyrgyz have higher O3 than C3, they just don't have O3c.
The Kyrgyz have from 37% to 67% Caucasoid Y-DNA to 25% to 42% Caucasoid mtDNA.

 

[ManUNITEDglory]

Recent studies in Russia on similar topic show the following results.
new.chronologia.org/volume10/turin_mongoly.php

Turkmens, Kurds, Georgians, Osetins, Lezgins, Azerbaijanis, Armenians - no.
Turkish population of Istanbul has 4.6% of haplogroup C. Probably they are the descendants of Nogais and Crimean Tatars.
At the same time currently Mongols have 9.2% of haplogroup R1a1 widespread in Eastern/Central Europe and Central Asia.

Y-DNA of Republic Azeris


J2a-20.8%
R1a-19%
R1b-17.5%
E1b-11.1%
G2-8.0%
T-7.9%
L-4.8%
J1-4.8%
Q-4.8%
N-1.6%


Y-DNA of Iranian Azeris

J2b-21.11%
R1b-15.15%
G2-12.12%
J1-9.09%
R1a-9.09%
Q-9.09%
N-6.06%
L-3.03%
J2a-3.03%
R2-3.03%
G1-3.03%
C3-3.03%
O-3.03%

They have 3.03% C3 + 3.03% O3 + 9.09% Q + 6.06% N of 22% Mongoloid Y-DNA



Take a look at Azeris Iranians who look like this

 

[Targon]

Where are those estimations coming from ?

Also what about Turks ? is there any work done on them that exludes other minorities of Turkey ?