What's new

Can Narendra Modi be disqualified over degree row?

mehboobkz

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 27, 2010
Messages
2,462
Reaction score
-6
Country
India
Location
Singapore
http://www.jantakareporter.com/blog/can-modi-disqualified-degree-row/44865


Abhishek G Bhaya

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and his Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) are leading a relentless attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi over the controversy surrounding his academic degrees. The allegations have shifted from Modi making false statement on oath about his qualifications in the electoral affidavit to now forging of documents with the emergence of ‘fake’ degrees in a section of the media.

Modi’s election affidavit in 2014 claimed he received a BA degree from Delhi University in 1978 and an MA degree from Gujarat University in 1983 but so far these claims haven’t been backed with authentic documents.


xmodi-asean-ap.jpg.pagespeed.ic.JoDSdWzP7B.webp



I have come across many individuals including journalists, albeit mostly Modi supporters (colloquially referred to as bhakts), who consider AAP’s relentless campaign as a meaningless (and trivial) pursuit without much political import. This blog is an attempt to show them the light.

In any case, the blind confidence of the bhakts run contrary to the nervousness with which BJP and the party’s governments – both at the Centre and in Gujarat – have reacted to questions regarding Modi’s ‘alleged’ degrees.

Is Modi’s qualification a ‘state secret’?

It is rather intriguing how RTI requests on the subject of Modi’s qualification were repeatedly rejected over the past two years (by DU, GU, Gujarat Government and Centre) and how the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) has protected the required information about the PM’s qualification as if they were ‘state secret’.


Modi, on his part, has remained silent on the controversy. Nothing new, as he remains silent on most issues these days – a trick the PM seems to have learnt well from his predecessor and mastered it better – earning the unflattering nickname of ‘MaunModi’.

What are they afraid of? Don’t people have the right to know how qualified their PM is?
The resistance betrays their unease over the subject.

Kejriwal must have added to the anxiety of BJP and the PM when he deftly used a query by Central Information Commission (CIC) – about the AAP leader’s residential address on the electoral affidavit which is being challenged in a court case – to put the spotlight squarely on the secrecy surrounding Modi’s degree.

While Kejriwal submitted the document proving his change of address in the above case, in the same breath he went on to write a very scathing letter to the CIC stating that if the is willing to put up all his details in the public domain, why shouldn’t the same rule apply to PM Modi too?

In that letter to CIC, written in Hindi, Kejriwal wrote: “I have no objection to my record being made public. But I have learnt that you have blocked information on Narendra Modi’s degree. The entire country wants to know the truth. Despite that you refused to release the details of his degree. Why did you do this? It is wrong.”

Treating Kejriwal’s response as an RTI application, the CIC not only directed Delhi University and Gujarat University to search and provide information on Modi’s degrees to the Delhi CM but also directed the PMO to provide “specific number and year” of Modi’s degree and PG degree to Delhi University and Gujarat University “so that it will be easy for them to search and provide any documents relating to it”.

The PMO is reportedly vexed by the CIC’s orders. Don’t be surprised if you see heads roll within the commission.

The plot thickens

Soon, a ‘duplicate copy’ of Modi’s Masters degree from Gujarat University appeared magically in a section of the media. Something was amiss though. A university, that had resisted all efforts to make public Modi’s degrees for the past two years, took barely a few hours after the CIC directive to ‘leak’ the information selectively to the media.


Not only was the timing of the ‘leak’ a suspect, even the degree was found to have several anomalies, as reported by JantaKaReporter, leading to speculations that it was a fabricated document. JantaKaReporter also subsequently reported on how both the signatories on Modi’s degree have previously been booked on charges of fraud, corruption, cheating and forgery.

Earlier last month the Gujarat University had also allegedly leaked Modi’s enrollment document, which had the PM’s date of birth wrong. It appeared to be a fake as well.

The emergence of these ‘fake’ documents has thickened the plot. Rather than easing the pressure on PM, the documents have only added to the controversy, handing over more ammunition to Kejriwal and AAP to attack Modi.

Modi’s continued silence on the subject hasn’t helped either as it hints at tacit approval for the forgery.



A case of cheating


Armed with the CIC order and following the publication of Modi’s ‘fake’ MA degree, the Delhi CM also wrote a letter to DU Vice Chancellor requesting him to make all information about Modi’s BA degree public.

There’s a question whether he (Modi) did a BA degree from DU or not. It’s being said that he did not get a degree from DU. According to sources, DU records do not have details of PM Modi’s admission, mark sheet, degree or any other record. This is very serious issue as Gujarat University has said he has done an MA from there. If he did not do his BA how did he get admission for an MA course? This creates a doubt that the degree is fake,” Kejriwal wrote.

While DU so far hasn’t been able to provide any evidence of Narendra Damodardas Modi ever being a student at the university, AAP meanwhile tracked down a BA degree from DU of one Narendra Mahaveer Modi dating back to 1978 (the same year that PM Modi claimed completing his degree). AAP claims this is adequate proof that Modi has not only lied in his affidavit but also indulged in fraud and forgery.

“It emerges that he (Modi) has done neither a BA nor an MA. Both degrees are fake. Firstly, he lied to the entire country, secondly, he lied in an affidavit and thirdly, the degrees are forged. This is a case of cheating. If the PM is accused of cheating under (IPC section) 420, this is a serious matter,” Kejriwal said on Friday.

One couldn’t agree more with the AAP leader. He indeed has a valid point.

By all accounts, prima facie it appears that Modi not only made a false statement about his degree in the electoral affidavit but also, amid fierce attack by Kejriwal, he erred for the second time by tacitly allowing the ‘fake’ degrees circulate in the media. This indeed is a criminal offence. Adding to Modi’s woes is his own silence.

US Examples

People/bhakts who are comparing this to the Obama-birther controversy would do well to remember that even Obama produced valid documents to prove that he was born in Hawaii and not in Indonesia as his opponents claimed.

He proved his bona fide too be eligible for the presidential elections and silenced his detractors.

And Canadian-born Ted Cruz, a presidential candidate in this year’s Republican primaries, had to get a verdict from Pennsylvania court to decide on a similar birther controversy. The court decided that Cruz is a ‘natural born citizen’ because he was a US citizen from the day he was born and therefore the place of birth could not be the determining factor.

Neither of the US leaders chose to remain silent when faced with controversies that challenged their eligibility to lead their nation. They either presented evidence in public or faced the court of law to wriggle out of the controversy.

Contrast that with our own PM’s response. It’s shocking why Modi hasn’t himself put out his degrees in public and ended the controversy once and for all? Most likely, because he doesn’t have them.

Key questions

Now, let’s take up the logical questions point-wise to understand the political ramifications of the controversy.

Can Modi be disqualified for not having the degrees he claimed he has in his election affidavit?

Technically no. The Indian Constitution hasn’t set any educational qualification requirement for the post of Prime Minister. Not having a degree does not disqualify a candidate in any way but if a candidate says he has degrees which he does not possess, then that would amount to having made a false declaration and misled voters.


Can Modi be booked for making a false statement in his electoral affidavit?

Yes. Giving false information on oath is listed as a criminal offence under Section 191 of the Indian Penal Code. While the Election Commission (to which Modi had submitted his affidavit) can take cognizance of the matter, currently it does not have any punitive power if the candidate has provided false information. The matter can be put for consideration vide a criminal suit in a court of law.

Can Modi be charged with forgery and cheating?

Yes.
If the ‘fake’ degree and enrollment document from GU circulating in the media are indeed found to be forgeries, Modi could be booked under IPC Section 420 for the criminal offence of cheating and forgery, as Kejriwal has rightly pointed out. Section 420 covers offences relating to cheating and dishonesty, and leads to punishment of fines and/or jail terms up to seven years. Going by the trend set by Delhi Police action against AAP MLA Jitendra Tomar, it isn’t really out of place to demand for Modi’s arrest.


Can Modi be disqualified if he is convicted in a criminal case?

Yes. And this is the most critical part in the current controversy. Existing laws under Representation of People Act call for the disqualification of a legislator from the moment s/he is convicted for a criminal offence. On 10 July 2013, the Supreme Court of India, in a landmark judgement of the Lily Thomas vs Union of India case (along with Lok Prahari vs Union of India), ruled that any Member of Parliament (MP), Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) or Member of a Legislative Council (MLC) who is convicted of a crime and awarded a minimum of two year imprisonment, loses membership of the House with immediate effect.

Political ramifications

This effectively means that if AAP and other opposition parties show collective political will to drag the PM to court over the degree row, and subsequently if the judiciary shows enough promptness to come up with conviction verdict before 2019 elections,. there is a theoretical chance of Modi losing his parliamentary membership, and therefore also his Prime Ministership.

So far, only Kejriwal-led AAP has shown courage. Now we hear Congress has also taken up the issue. If the rest of the opposition unite and make the ‘degree issue’ a rallying cry for the resignation of the PM on ethical grounds, Modi is bound to feel the heat.

Whatever the outcome be, the credibility of PM Modi has taken a severe beating. He was already being dubbed as ‘Feku’, ‘Gappu’, ‘Jumlebaaz’ etc for not keeping his promises to his electorate. His tall claims on ‘Gujarat Model’, hollow electoral promises of bringing back black money from foreign banks and crediting RS 15 lakhs in every Indian’s bank account have anyway tarnished his record.

This fake degree episode is, by far, the most substantial evidence to prove that Modi suffers from a pathological compulsion of taking massive liberties with truth. He had earlier lied about his marital status in electoral affidavits. This is also a reflection on how lightly Modi takes the issue of political ethics.

Moreover, Modi will have to carry the rather unflattering tag of ‘Shree 420’ for forging his degrees and cheating his voters. This is certainly a new low for an Indian PM. The question is whether we as citizens are ready to continue with ‘Shree 420’ at helm or do we deserve better? Can we trust a PM to discharge his duties honestly, whose very election, it seems now, is based on the foundation of lies, dishonesty and false propaganda?

Like it or not, Kejriwal’s protracted pursuit of the subject has led Modi to commit blunder after blunder which may hurt him politically in the long run. And the Prime Minister may be well aware of the repercussions. That may partly explain his silence too. He may be hoping for the controversy to die on its own. After all, media has a short memory. But will it, this time?
 
EXPOSE: Arvind Kejriwal’s DEGREE under Question? This RTI reveals a SERIOUS Question
May 7, 2016

For the past few days, while the whole nation is curious about the big scam conducted by Sonia Gandhi and other Congressis in the VVIP Chopper scam, someone has been busy trying to divert attention from there. Arvind Kejriwal is busy asking for the degree of the prime minister Shri Narendra Modi. First, he started with asking for the prime minister’s highest degree. When it was proved that Narendra Modi did actually finish his masters with first class, he has now shifted focus to Bachelor’s degree of Modi.

But a closer investigation into his own degree reveals a serious question. Arvind Kejriwal has studied in IIT Kharagpur. A curious citizen of Delhi asked, with the help of RTI, some questions to IIT Kharagpur.

Here are the questions and the answers received:



As can be seen in the copy of the RTI above, the information on IIT-JEE rank of Arvind Kejriwal is not available.

So, we ask Mr. Arvind Kejriwal to please reveal his IIT-JEE AIR through which he got entry into IIT Kharagpur. If he did not appear for IIT-JEE, how did he get admission into IIT Kharagpur? Will Arvind Kejriwal answer?

http://satyavijayi.com/expose-arvin...question-this-rti-reveals-a-serious-question/

:)







Video: Sonia Gandhi's PHD degree fake, she studied till 5th standard only, claims Swamy
By: Mukul Kumar Mishra
Updated: Tuesday, July 14, 2015, 16:14 [IST]

New Delhi, June 26: In the wake of political leaders' educational qualification under the lens, BJP leader Subramanian Swamy has given yet another shocking statement.

Swamy, who is known for stocking controversies with his statements has said that Sonia Gandhi's PHD degree is fake. Swamy further said that Congress president has only studied till fifth standard.

While speaking in a function in Bangalore, BJP leader claimed that he had reiterated this statement earlier also.

Swamy said, "In the affidavit, Sonia Gandhi claims that she did her PHD degree from Cambridge University in London. But I can prove that she has a fake degree. She could be jailed like Aam aadmi Party leader Jitender Singh Tomar".

Read more: Video: Rahul Gandhi was caught with drugs in USA, says Subramanian Swamy

He further stated, "When i had filled a PIL over the issue, honorable court told me to leave the matter as it is an old case".

BJP leader said that Sonia Gandhi has lied about her birthplace also. She has given false informations about her citizenship in her passport and Indian citizenship form.

Earlier, Swamy had said that Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi was caught with 1.60 lakh dollar and white powder by US police in 2001.


http://www.oneindia.com/india/congr...-s-phd-degree-is-fake-says-swamy-1789096.html
 
SONIA GANDHI ?
TO UNVEIL SONIA'S REAL STORY


FRIDAY, APRIL 3, 2009
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION OF SONIA GANDHI

Sonia Gandhi has not studied beyond High School. She has falsely claimed in her affidavit filed as a contesting candidate before the Rae Bareli Returning Officer in the 2004 Lok Sabha elections, that she qualified and got a diploma in English from the prestigious University of Cambridge, UK.


The truth is that Ms. Gandhi has never studied in any college anywhere. She did go to a Catholic nun run seminary-school called Maria Ausiliatrice in Giaveno [15 kms from adopted home town of Orbassabo]. Poverty those days forced young Italian girls to go to such missionaries and then in their teens go to UK to get jobs as cleaning maids, waitresses and au pair. The Mainos were poor those days.


COPY OF AFFIDAVIT FILED BY SONIA GANDHI BEFORE RETURNING OFFICER OF RAIBARELLI CONSTITUENCY IN 2004 PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN WHICH SHE GAVE FALSE INFORMATION REGARDING HER EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
Her father was a mason and mother a sharecropper.


Sonia thus went to the town of Cambridge and first learnt some English in a teaching shop called Lennox School [which has since 1970 been wound up]. That is all her "education" i.e. ---learnt enough English language to get domestic help jobs.

It is worth mentioning that Lennox School which has since 1970 been wound up has never been affiliated to Cambridge University as it has been claimed by Sonia Gandhi in her affidavit filed before returning officer of Raibarelli. But Sonia gave false information about her education because in Indian society education is highly valued. Thus, to fool the Indian public, Sonia Gandhi wilfully fibbed about her qualifications in Parliamentary records [which is a Breach of Ethics Rules] and in a sworn affidavit [which is criminal offence under IPC, severe enough to disqualify her from being MP]. In popular parlance, this is called 420 or 10 "numberi" [not to be confused with 10 Janpath].


On June 1 2004, Mr Manoj Kaushik wrote to the Press Centre, University of Cambridge as mentioned below: -

To, The Press Centre,
University of Cambridge,
Dear Sir,
With due respect I wish to submit few lines for your kind perusal. I request you some Clarification regarding affiliation of a school with University of Cambridge. Recently a person declared in her affidavit that she did a Certificate course at; Lennox Cook School, University of Cambridge in 1967. Link to the affidavit
upgov.nic.in/election/Aff...G_sc5.html .
Implying that Lennox Cook School is an affiliate of University of Cambridge.
Later on we learnt that the school is closed and there is some scepticism that the school is not affiliated to Cambridge University .In this regard we that you are the correct body to contact for clarification.
I earnestly request you to clarify us how 'Lennox Cook School' is associated with Cambridge University .
Regards Manoj Kaushik

On 28 September 2004 Mr. R. Vaidyanathan, Professor of Finance & Control of UTI Chair Professor and ICSSR National Fellow, wrote following letter: -

To,
Laura Morgan,
Press and Publications Office,
University of Cambridge,
Dear Laura Morgan,
I am sure you are aware of the excitement and curiosity generated in India regarding the claim of Mrs. Sonia [Rajeev] Gandhi regarding her studies, at a language school-Lennox School-affiliated to your University. She swears in the affidavit [for getting elected as an MP] that she completed Certificate of English from Lennox Cook School-University of Cambridge in the year 1965. Other leaders have contested the fact that the language school was part of Cambridge University.
Either the said school was part of your University system [in terms of recognition] or it was not. I am sure you will agree with me that there cannot be a third option.
Under the circumstances it would be most appropriate for a prestigious university like yours, to issue a press statement / clarification in this matter. Normally, you may not want to issue press statements on many such claims and counter claims. But in this case, the matter pertains to an important and highly respected leader of India [a Commonwealth Country] and the affidavit and dispute are in the public domain.
I am a professor, for more than two decades at a prestigious business school n India. If your University does not take cognisance of this important and serious issue, and fail to bestow the attention it requires, then as an academician of more than twenty five year standing [including, as a visiting Professor at Manchester Business School and at other major US schools], I will be forced to conclude that your University is not particularly interested in truthful representation of credentials and perhaps encourages commonwealth leaders to follow-- suggestio veri suppresio falsi-principle.
I hope for the sake of academic integrity and truthfulness, your university will issue a press statement at the earliest. I am not a member of any political party in India and this letter of mine is essentially from an academician for the purpose of clarification in the light of the debate it has generated in our country. I am eager that tall leaders of my country are not tarred by insinuation by irresponsible politicians.
It is also part of a small effort on my part to clean our electoral system, which needs many changes.
I am giving below the copy of the affidavit filed by Mrs. Sonia { Rajeev] Gandhi before the returning officer for her Parliamentary election held in May 2004.
Thank you for your time and hope to get a response from your side.
upgov.nic.in/election/Aff...G_sc1.html
upgov.nic.in/election/Aff...G_sc2.html
upgov.nic.in/election/Aff...G_sc3.html
upgov.nic.in/election/Aff...G_sc4.html
upgov.nic.in/election/Aff...G_sc5.html
R.Vaidyanathan
Professor of Finance and control &
UTI Chair Professor and ICSSR National Fellow

On September 28, 2004 spokesperson of Cambridge University categorically sated that "The Lennox School was never affiliated to the Cambridge University".

Earlier talking to reporters separately, Dr. Swamy said he had filed a criminal complaint with the Rae Bareli District Magistrate, who is also the Returning Officer of the Lok Sabha constituency, against Ms. Sonia Gandhi for filing a "false affidavit" regarding her educational qualifications. He said an "action" committee comprising members of various political parties would organise meetings at major cities to "expose the true colours" of Ms. Gandhi.


Dr Swamy, who met the RO Rae Bareli, produced what he said was "documentary evidence" to prove that Sonia was never a student of the Cambridge University. He submitted two letters dated November 21 and 28 2001) from the Cambridge University student records and statistics authorities stating that no student with the name of either Sonia Maino or Gandhi was ever registered with the university.

Dr Swamy demanded that the RO should quash Sonia's election from Rae Bareli parliamentary constituency and initiate criminal proceedings against her under sections 177, 181 and 191 of the IPC for wilful false declaration on the affidavit she had filed before the RO in May 2004 that she had a degree from the University of Cambridge.

"The fact of the matter is that she has not even passed high school and is barely literate. Yet, she has lied to the electorate, committed a criminal offence and hence unfit to be an MP," he said at a press conference in Lucknow after his return from Rae Bareli. Earlier, Dr Swamy had filed two more cases against Sonia. Two PILs, accusing Sonia of receiving huge sums from KGB and her involvement into antique smuggling, are pending before the Delhi High Court. The Delhi HC has issued notices to CBI fixing November 17 as the next date for hearing.The Janata Party president declared that he would file three more cases against Sonia in near future. "One would deal with corruption and amassing disproportionate assets. The other would be based on her suspected involvement in the conspiracy behind her husband late Rajiv Gandhi's assassination and the third for keeping the Italian citizenship even today," he announced, demanding cancellation of her Indian citizenship.

http://knowsoniagandhi.blogspot.in/2009/04/educational-qualification-of-sonia.html

:)
 
Video: Rahul Gandhi was caught with drugs in USA, says Subramanian Swamy

By: Mukul Kumar Mishra Updated: Monday, June 22, 2015, 12:52 [IST]

New Delhi, June 20: BJP leader BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, who is known for giving shocking and controversial statements has done it yet again. Swamy has said that Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi was caught with 1.60 lakh dollar and white powder by US police in 2001.

Read more: Gandhi, Nehru saw Netaji as threat to their positions: Subramanian Swamy

BJP leader has given this statement while defending embattled Rajasthan Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje, who is embroiled in the 'Lalitgate' controversy. According to a report in Hindi daily, Swamy who had come at Jodhpur court for defending Asaram Bapu said that Raje didn't do anything wrong in Lalit Modi controversy. "To help someone in getting Indian passport doesn't fall in the category of any crime", furious Swamy said.
Supporting Raje, peeved Swamy said that when Rahul Gandhi was caught by US police, Sonia Gandhi had called up then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee. It was Vajpayee who then rang up American President Jorge Bush and got Rahul Gandhi released. Swamy who reportedly had reiterated this statement many a times in the past may face flak from the Opposition. Earlier, Swamy termed Vasundhara Raje 'Jhansi ki Rani', who is "capable of sailing through any controversy on her own". On asking about why party leaders left her to fend for herself, Swamy said, "She is capable of protecting herself very well. She does not need the support of any party cadre. "What Raje did was just a small favour to an old friend on humanitarian ground, which was not a crime".


http://www.oneindia.com/india/rahul...america-claims-subramanian-swamy-1783256.html
 
Well if tomar can be sacked and arrested then Modi should be too if proved
1462609913915TMPSHARING00000.jpg
 
Last edited:
If he wasn't disqualified for massacring muslims then how will he be disqualified over merely a degree?
massacring muslims is difficult to prove but false claim of degree can be proved... hope somebody files PIL in court.
 
Back
Top Bottom