Build Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, Masjid-e-Aman in Lucknow: Shia Waqf Board

[ranjeet]

The Shia Central Waqf Board offered a solution Monday to the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi conflict in Ayodhya.

The Board submitted a draft proposal to the Supreme Court seeking an amicable resolution to the Ayodhya issue by calling for the construction of a 'Masjid-e-Aman' in Lucknow's Hussainabad area.

Speaking to the media, Shia Central Waqf Board chairman Syed Waseem Rizvi said, "The draft for resolving the Ayodhya issue, prepared by the Shia Waqf Board, has been submitted to the Supreme Court on November 18."

He called the proposal "the best" while saying that the board is the "mutawalli" (caretaker) of the Babri Mosque and "had suggested giving up its right over the land in Ayodhya".

Rizvi added, "The Board is of the view that instead of Ayodhya, a 'Masjid-e-Aman' be constructed in Lucknow's Hussainabad area and it has requested the government to provide one acre land for it."

Referring to the claims of the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board over the disputed site, Rizvi said the one-third land given by the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court through its September 2010 judgement was to Muslims and not to the Sunni Waqf Board.

Rizvi had claimed that as the Sunni Waqf Board had lost the case of its registration in several courts, only the Shia Waqf board had a right to the mosque.

Rizvi, addressed the press conference along with Mahant Narendra Giri, chairman of the All India Akhara Parishad, alleged that the Shia Board's views on the matter were never put forward in a forceful manner because the lawyers deployed for the purpose were "fake".

"On perusal of the files of the board, we have found that the lawyers pursuing the matter had not even been given the "vakalatnama" by the board, Rizvi said. He also demanded that the government order an inquiry into it.

Rizvi said, "The Shia Waqf Board is being accused of becoming active on the Ayodhya dispute lately but the reality is that it had no knowledge that lawyers have been deployed in the court from its side...The government needs to inquire as to who had deployed counsels on behalf of the board who did not plead the case properly."

Giri said that a Ram temple in Ayodhya will be constructed soon and that an amicable settlement should be reached on the issue by talking to all the parties concerned.

http://www.wionews.com/india-news/s...dir-in-ayodhya-masjid-e-aman-in-lucknow-24679

 

[El Sidd]

 

[313ghazi]

Ya Allah, thank you for Pakistan - we are undeserving.

 

[El Sidd]

Ya Allah, thank you for Pakistan - we are undeserving.

what has Pakistan to do with any of this?

 

[313ghazi]

what has Pakistan to do with any of this?

It's a place where a masjid cannot be torn down and have a mandir built over the top of it, just becase some RSS goons feel like doing so. It's a sanctuary for Muslims from Hinduvata subjegation.

 

[El Sidd]

It's a place where a masjid cannot be torn down and have a mandir built over the top of it, just becase some RSS goons feel like doing so. It's a sanctuary for Muslims from Hinduvata subjegation.

and somehow that is major concern of the populace?

Mosques are regularly relocated based on construction works and other reasons.

yahan peeo to haram hai or waha peeo to halal hai.... theek logic pe chalte ho aap log

 

[313ghazi]

and somehow that is major concern of the populace?

Mosques are regularly relocated based on construction works and other reasons.

yahan peeo to haram hai or waha peeo to halal hai.... theek logic pe chalte ho aap log

They are not torn down because someone thinks an ancient temple was on the same site. There is a difference between development and persecution.

 

[thesolar65]

Opposing Parties don't understand. If they allow Mandir there and Masjid in Lucknow, Many Hindus....Even PDF die hard RSS followers will also donate for Masjid and that will be a grand one.

 

[El Sidd]

They are not torn down because someone thinks an ancient temple was on the same site. There is a difference between development and persecution.

persecution?
now go with this logic to the court which will say what is your opinion about the hindus who are psychologically persecuted every time they are reminded of it.
Hindus are constitutionally oppressed in India and nobody understands that simply because its not fashionable.

No wonder the Shia Waqf board had enough foresight and decency to demand this as a plausible solution to an ancient problem.

 

[313ghazi]

persecution?
now go with this logic to the court which will say what is your opinion about the hindus who are psychologically persecuted every time they are reminded of it.
Hindus are constitutionally oppressed in India and nobody understands that simply because its not fashionable.

No wonder the Shia Waqf board had enough foresight and decency to demand this as a plausible solution to an ancient problem.

There is no unanimous evidence of any site. Even if there was no hindu in India has ever seen it, unless they are 600 years old. The shia waqf board are simply settling old scores.

 

[pothead]

There is no unanimous evidence of any site. Even if there was no hindu in India has ever seen it, unless they are 600 years old. The shia waqf board are simply settling old scores.

The Above is from Ram Mandir, Ayodhya where Babur built his structure. Anyone who visits that site can see. Lying is haram in your culture. So, what does that make you? A kaafir?

The above is from the same place. Unless Hindus went back in time and built these structures at "babri", can you explain how these are magically present at that site?

Btw, below are couple more temples where mosques are built. Unless your eyes are not functioning properly, we can see what happened in these places.
Finally, can you show me one structure where Hindus built a temple on an existing mosque? ONE, I challenge you. Don't normalize the dastardly acts of Mughals. They were anything but muslims never reflecting the message of Islam. no "real" muslim should ever support these dastardly Mughals who did inhuman acts. Remember what the holy book says about the death of one innocent and contrast that with what these Mughals did.

 

[livingdead]

i doubt sunni waqf board which is the main party in the conflict, will agree... the issue is not ayodhya as such from muslim point of view, the issue is, if today hindus get 1 temple, tomorrow they will ask for more... there are many mosques which were build on top of temples, sometimes just a dome on top of existing structure.

 

[Sharpshooter12]

yahan peeo to haram hai or waha peeo to halal hai.... theek logic pe chalte ho aap log

Yep Yahan her koi Shariat ka nifaaz chahta hai aur wahan ke liye pure secularism. Sakht kisam ki munafqat hai yeh hum logon ki.

 

[El Sidd]

Yep Yahan her koi Shariat ka nifaaz chahta hai aur wahan ke liye pure secularism. Sakht kisam ki munafqat hai yeh hum logon ki.

Bus ji.... Khud ki kashti me soorakh hai or dosron ko lakri bech rahen hai.

Ye ummah chumma raseed log bohat khatarnaak hain. Khaas tor pe ye secular ummah walay. Hum chotay thay to ye militant al zulfiqaar hotay they.

Ajkal aman ki aasha me jang chahtey hain fassadiz.

 

[Sharpshooter12]

Hum chotay thay to ye militant al zulfiqaar hotay they.

haha aap ne phir bhi achay time mein bachpan guzar liya, jub hum chotay thay toh Qazi sahib Commander Mast Gul ko kandhay pe utha ker minar e Pakistan laye thay. Suna hai aaj kal Mast Gul Daish mein shamil ho gaya hai