I am giving you a bit of knowhow regarding how the Indian bureaucracy operates. Plans are made with long-term goals.
Tell me, what will be the basis of a separatist political movement ?
The objective will be to move to a state which will provide something better, right ? What is that better thing ?
Religious freedom ? India already provides that. Better livelihood, income opportunities, education, healthcare ? Political stability ? India fares better than Pakistan in all those parameters in Kashmir and they will keep improving. So, why would a normal Kashmiri want to be a Pakistani ?
People inside your GHQ has been asking that question to themselves for a long time. They don't have a satisfactory answer for that. Hence the necessity to artificially keep the issue alive by means of supporting terrorism and the achievement has been a big zero in that front.
There had been a genuine insurgency problem back in the 90s. With the development of India, that issue has been addressed.
Had it been a mass political movement, then forget India, no force in the World would have been able to keep Kashmir. Take the example of East Pakistan for example. They had a genuine grievance and it was very poorly addressed. It took the shape of a nation-wide political movement and the objectives were realized within an year or so. The same cannot be said about Kashmir, which is under Indian control for more than 60 years and regularly holds democratic elections. The CM of Pakistani Kashmir on the other hand has very less powers in comparison to his Indian counterpart.
With the further and deeper penetration of media in the coming years more and more people in Pakistani Kashmir will know about the progress and development in Indian Kashmir. Then, they will start asking inconvenient questions. Are you prepared for that ? Have you thought about that ? Issue at your hand deserves a better response than a simple -lolzz