Taygibay
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2010
- Messages
- 3,392
- Reaction score
- 29
- Country
- Location
If you replaced You with Stupidity and forget borders, real or in your mind, I'd second that statement, man.In short, you are the reason for the state of the world today. I hope that haunts you.
But then sadly I'd include you in it?
A guy making Ozone and Nitrogen, oxygen and hydrogen is not responsible for the State's policy which itself
evolves over time. If a Frenchman ever bombs something in Pakistan for warped politico-religious-hate views,
count on me to denounce it without commenting on your human rights record ( example ) as an excuse! YVW!
Every time that a Iran nuclear deal is near, something strange happen in France. Why?.
When Laussane talks... Germanwings crash and Charles de Gaulle Aircraft carrier in the Gulf.
Now... it's happen this. Coincidence?.
It seems that USA needs French fighters jets in ME to attack Saudi Arabia when a Iranian deal will be signed.
Saudi ruling elite trust in French USA puppets yet? They should think twice.
This smell to big war in Middle East. Iran needs a big war to increase oil barrel prices... and Russia too. Without war, oil barrel prices will down when western sanctions over Iran will be lifted.
That is both interesting and non-linear as hell, mate!
I'd credit some validity to your thinking such attacks possibly being false flags ops due to timing.
Then you charge the Americans but your target is all wrong. Not only is it unlikely and possibly a
new dissent point if it was asked as ties with Saudi Arabia are quite good ATM in part against US
interest but even then, the USA would not ask such a thing of us. The administration in place is
only waning in its support for Foreign policy reasons, not turning against KSA and it's one of the
least pro-wars of the last decades, almost down to Carter's stint. Those that would favor war say
hardcore GOP figures would certainly not favor the Iran deal thus annulling the rationale for action.
As for puppets, it is belied by the aforementioned fight for influence in the Gulf between the two?
You then go on to link although I find it more of an alternative, Iran as needing this war, when actually
the present situation extends its influence faster at lesser cost ( and brought on by the gulf policies in
faith themselves ) yet has not so far stopped the negotiation process, and Russia who I'd tend to see
as having rather conflictual interests than America. So which is it?
Fallacies abound there, I'm afraid. Would you care to straighten that?
Good day all, Tay.