After reading this it seems Bangladesh was in ultimate Chaos, run by thugs followed by man made famine! It explains why change in 1975 was welcomed by people. My question is 40 years later why intellectuals promote bangabandhu cult so shamelessly???
The AL misuses history for its own benefit.
I question if their ideology is even sustainable.
Nationalism based on culture alone (mostly language in this case) is destined to fail. We are already seeing it. I mean, tell me one nationalist ideology based on culture alone which has proven to be successful?
In fact, after the fall of Mujib, it should have simply dissolved completely, and form a new left-wing party with a sustainable ideology.
I find it surprising that the AL is still going after all these years. Perhaps some "magic hands" going on over there?
These so-called "intellectuals" (at very high levels) even at my university promote that image. Albeit, with no sense of taking responsibility for history.
It is very odd.
Its surprise BD members does not give respect to their freedom frighter.
Frighter?
I think you mean fighter
We do give Mujib respect, as well as our freedom fighters. Any man who's immune to criticism is obviously not human!
Maybe that's why we see him as some sort of demigod within the AL of today.
All of the printed money notes right now have the image of Mujib. And not a single mention of influential individuals like Zia and Fazlul, the Red Mullah, etc.
That is what Kobiraaz meant. It has inherently evolved into a cult which misuse history for its own benefit.
I think the problem is that the views have been too polarized to the extent that most people don't even know what happened. You can either be pro independence or anti liberation force but some facts wont change no matter what. And, also some of the members depend heavily on forums for their history rather than read books, or even newspapers back in 1971. I, personally, blame the government who tried to infiltrate their narrative of the story through the local textbooks which has been often changed. We need an independent institution, backed with scholarly individuals unbiased from any political view, to establish the facts.
Unfortunately or fortunately, I have learned more about Bangladesh history mostly through Pakistani writers, Indian writers and American writers, rather than any Bangladeshi writer which is filled with political bias.
This is (un)fortunately true, at least for Bangladesh.