What's new

Bond Between China and Russia Alarms U.S. and Europe Amid Ukraine Crisis

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China

Bond Between China and Russia Alarms U.S. and Europe Amid Ukraine Crisis​

The Biden administration plans to build up global coalitions to counter a pact between Vladimir V. Putin and Xi Jinping, portending a new type of Cold War.

Feb. 20, 2022Updated 12:04 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON — When Wang Yi, China’s foreign minister, called on Saturday for talks to resolve the crisis in Europe, he said Ukraine’s sovereignty should be “respected and safeguarded” — but also sided with Russia in saying that NATO enlargement was destabilizing the continent.

“If NATO keeps expanding eastward, is it conducive to maintaining peace and stability in Europe?” he said by video at the Munich Security Conference in Germany, which Vice President Kamala Harris was attending in person to rally countries against Russia.

It was the latest instance of what Western officials say is China taking a bold new swing at the United States and its allies by wading into European security issues to explicitly back Russia, which has amassed as many as 190,000 troops around Ukraine for a possible invasion — despite the fact Ukraine is not joining NATO anytime soon.

Current and former U.S. and European officials say they are alarmed over what is effectively a nonaggression pact between China and Russia that could amount to a realignment of the world order. Portending a new type of Cold War, Biden administration officials say the United States will work to create and bolster its own coalitions of democratic nations — including new Europe and Asia-Pacific strategic groups — and help countries develop advanced military capabilities.

John F. Kirby, the chief Pentagon spokesman, said last week that the U.S. government was watching the “burgeoning relationship” between China and Russia. He said that a joint statement issued by the two countries in early February when Presidents Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and Xi Jinping of China met in Beijing showed that China was standing behind Mr. Putin’s military buildup around Ukraine.

“Their tacit support, if you will, for Russia is deeply alarming, and, frankly, even more destabilizing to the security situation in Europe,” Mr. Kirby said.

In recent weeks, the two nations negotiated a 30-year contract for Russia to supply gas to China through a new pipeline. They blocked a demand from Washington that the United Nations impose additional sanctions on North Korea for new missile tests, even though the two nations had agreed to similar sanctions before. And Russia moved large numbers of troops from Siberia to its west, a sign that Moscow, in preparing for a potential invasion of Ukraine, trusts China along their shared border in the east.

Their long courtship reached a peak with the 5,000-word joint statement that said their partnership had “no limits,” which some Biden administration officials see as a turning point in China-Russia relations and a brazen challenge to American and European power. The statement was the first in which China explicitly joined Russia in opposing any further expansion of NATO, and the two countries denounced Washington’s Indo-Pacific strategy and its new security partnership, AUKUS, which includes Britain and Australia. The nations also described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China.”

China and Russia declared that they would work with other countries to “promote genuine democracy” and counter American-led ideology and institutions — building a new world order in which autocracies are unchallenged, U.S. and European officials say.

“They seek a new era, as they say, to replace the existing international order,” Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, said in Munich on Saturday. “They prefer the rule of the strongest to the rule of law, intimidation instead of self-determination, coercion instead of cooperation.”

The strengthening China-Russia ties could herald a reconfiguring of the triangle of power that defined the Cold War and that President Richard M. Nixon exploited 50 years ago on Monday when he made a historic visit to Beijing to normalize diplomatic relations. That helped the United States and China counterbalance the Soviet Union. Ties between Beijing and Moscow had been unraveling for years over issues of ideology and foreign policy.

The opposite is happening now.

“It’s certainly concerning, and it is not a positive development from the standpoint of U.S. national security or U.S. national interests,” said Susan Shirk, the chair of the 21st Century China Center at the University of California, San Diego, and a former State Department official. “They have a kind of common perspective on the U.S. right now, and there is this affinity between the leaders.”

Ms. Shirk said President Biden nonetheless should try engaging in diplomacy with Mr. Xi to coax him to act with the United States on the Russia-created Ukraine crisis. “This seems like Diplomacy 101 given at least the history of this triangular relationship,” she added.

China and Russia are not united by ideology, and they are in a marriage of convenience that Russia needs more. While Mr. Xi appreciates Mr. Putin’s defiance of the United States, he does not want the economic uncertainty that a European war would bring. China also traditionally insists on respecting every nation’s sovereignty, as Mr. Wang made clear on Saturday.

There are limits to what China would do to help Mr. Putin if he invades Ukraine. After Washington imposes sanctions on Russia, Chinese companies could buy more oil and gas from Russia and help fill some technology gaps, but the major Chinese state-owned banks would probably refrain from overt violations of the sanctions for fear of being shut out of the global financial system.
Mr. Xi and Mr. Putin have met 38 times as national leaders. They share a drive to restore their nations to a former glory that they see as having been stripped from their homelands by Western European powers, the United States and, in China’s case, Japan. Both are obsessed with the breakup of the Soviet Union in 1991: Mr. Putin seeks to forcefully wind back the clock to a pre-collapse era, while Mr. Xi aims to prevent China from meeting the same fate as the Soviet empire. They accuse Washington of fomenting mass protests and democracy movements around the world to overthrow other governments.

An intensifying conflict with China and Russia would have a different shape than the Cold War. China’s trade economy is deeply integrated with those of other nations, including the United States, and Russia is an important energy exporter to Europe. For practical reasons, the three governments would be unable to completely block commercial exchanges with each other or form distinct economic blocs with partner countries, like in the days of the Iron Curtain.

Nevertheless, foreign leaders and Democratic and Republican foreign policy practitioners have expressed concern in recent days.

In a Wall Street Journal opinion column titled “Entente Multiplies the Threat From Russia and China,” John R. Bolton, the hawkish national security adviser under President Donald J. Trump, argued that the partnership “will last” because the two countries’ interests “are mutually complementary for the foreseeable future.” Stephen J. Hadley, the national security adviser under President George W. Bush, called the joint statement “a manifesto for their global leadership,” while Kevin Rudd, the former prime minister of Australia, said China’s explicitly pro-Russia position on European security was “new and significant and quite a radical departure from the past.”

Scott Morrison, the current prime minister of Australia, denounced China last week for remaining “chillingly silent” on Russia’s military buildup around Ukraine and noted that the two countries were “banding together.”

 
.

Western leaders worried as China joins Russia in NATO expansion row​

Issued on: 19/02/2022 - 14:30
225228bcaa5eb8a252018134fc66fce5c9e85d0e.webp

Stern warning: European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. Virginia Mayo POOL/AFP

Western leaders on Saturday said Russia and China were seeking to "replace the existing international rules" with their own order, as Beijing backed Moscow in the Kremlin's showdown with the western military alliance, NATO.

US President Joe Biden has warned that Vladimir Putin plans an invasion of former Soviet state, Ukraine, within days.

Moscow is using the threat against Ukraine to demand a halt to NATO expansion and what it calls "Cold War" ideologies.

"For the first time we now see Beijing joining Moscow in calling on NATO to stop admitting new members," noted the alliance's chief Jens Stoltenberg, speaking at the Munich Security Conference.
"It is an attempt to control the fate of free nations, to rewrite the international rulebook and impose their own authoritarian models of governance," he warned.

EU chief Ursula von der Leyen had stronger words, accusing Moscow of a "blatant attempt" to rewrite the global order.

Russia and China are seeking to "replace the existing international rules -- they prefer the rule of the strongest to the rule of law, intimidation instead of self-determination," she told the Munich conference.

Addressing the same forum via video-link a few hours later, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Beijing's commitment to respecting territorial sovereignty has been "consistent" and that anyone challenging it was "distorting" its position.

But he also questioned whether an eastern expansion of NATO would guarantee lasting peace.

Move beyond the Cold War mentality​

"We believe that the Cold War is long gone -- NATO was a product of the Cold War era and now we need to look at the current situation and there needs to be an adaptation of NATO," he said.
"If there is persistent eastern expansion, will that guarantee peace in Europe? That is a question that our friends in Europe need to consider seriously."

Wang also stressed that "all parties have the right to raise their concerns, while the reasonable concerns of Russia should also be respected and heeded."

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz warned against viewing the world through Cold War lenses.

"There are now only capitalist countries on the globe, if you exclude North Korea. And if you see it like this, the difference between the states is about autocracy, about the way we rule our countries, about democracy," he said.

"It is absolutely clear that we are going into a world that is multi-polar," he said, adding that "you can be sure that other upcoming or already great nations of Asia will not accept" any attempts by China or Russia to build up their own spheres of domination or interest.

"Not Korea, not Japan, not Vietnam, not Indonesia, not Malaysia," he warned.

 
.
Obama's chief of staff: "Never let a crisis go to waste"

Washington has way more avenues to hurt China, than China is able to fight back with this. This was staged to hurt China and Europe.

If Paraguay wants to freely join nato, that is their decision. They are a free country. NATO is hated by the cia and trump. Getting the masses to hate China and support putin-trump is the goal of the cia. It is QUAD that is China's concern. Europe has not ended trade with China or sanctioned China, why start something against NATO to support putin. Don't make putins enemies into China's enemies.

putin is rubbing off on China, and like a textbook plan, the West is blaming China to get full support of anti-China measures.

What China could do constructively is work with the EU to prevent inflation from this or any crisis. That would thwart any cia plans. Nord Stream 2 looks gone, though the EU could save the other imports until Europe is ready for alternative shipments of natural gas.
 
Last edited:
. .
Obama's chief of staff: "Never let a crisis go to waste"

Washington has way more avenues to hurt China, than China is able to fight back with this. This was staged to hurt China and Europe.

If Paraguay wants to freely join nato, that is their decision. They are a free country. NATO is hated by the cia and trump. Getting the masses to hate China and support putin-trump is the goal of the cia. It is QUAD that is China's concern. Europe has not ended trade with China or sanctioned China, why start something against NATO to support putin. Don't make putins enemies into China's enemies.

putin is rubbing off on China, and like a textbook plan, the West is blaming China to get full support of anti-China measures.

What China could do constructively is work with the EU to prevent inflation from this or any crisis. That would thwart any cia plans. Nord Stream 2 looks gone, though the EU could save the other imports until Europe is ready for alternative shipments of natural gas.
incompetent wailing:omghaha: :omghaha: :omghaha:
 
.
The global suppy chain now is firmly in China's hands making the whole west helplessly dependent on China, what can they do about it?
 
. .
The global suppy chain now is firmly in China's hands making the whole west helplessly dependent on China, what can they do about it?


I am afraid nothing.
Europe and America has reached the end of its civilization cycle. Post-modernism is the new religion here.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom