pkpatriotic
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2008
- Messages
- 2,317
- Reaction score
- 0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Another soft target. The real test is to see whether the government will throw in the towel and let these elements regroup and reassert themselves or if it will go all out and punish them just as bad. I think the public opinion is starting to turn against these "miscreants" (as per the authorities) so now may be the best time to press on.
...the security situation is suddenly getting bad!
...the security situation is suddenly getting bad!
The not negotiating with terrorist stance, albeit not nearly as black and white as the cowboys of the current US administration make it seem, certainly has its merits. However, this option of rejoining society isn't nearly as easy as you make it seem. For that to be a true option, the state first needs to invest in a massive institution capable of facilitating reintegration. There are literally generations of men out there who know nothing but fighting and dying in the name of "religion"; many of them have also been addicted to opiates from a young age. From a purely psychiatric stance, these people can't realistically be expected to re-join a functional society. There is of course the counter argument to this I've encountered which says...but an overwhelming majority of these people are only seasonal radicalists, where they only spend a few months from the year doing active fighting, so all they have to do is stay in their homes for the few extra months. Granted the fact about the seasonal participation is true (corroborated by Ahmed Rashid's research team this past 2 years); but the problem with the argument itself is that it over looks the fact that even during their "civilian time" these people are living in dysfunctional societies where the social fabric itself has been denuding steadily over a period of 3 decades. The possibility of someone born and raised in this environment to enter a society which is governed by a rule of law in a hierarchal governmental system lies somewhere between slim and nil.The security situation will get bad - the key is to not 'throw in the towel' and go for 'peace deals' any more, as Blain stated.
The West may have its faults, but on the count of not negotiating with terrorists it is absolutely correct, and that has been shown time and time again in FATA and Swat. Militant should have an option to disarm and rejoin society, but that is it - disarm or we continue to act against you.
The not negotiating with terrorist stance, albeit not nearly as black and white as the cowboys of the current US administration make it seem, certainly has its merits. However, this option of rejoining society isn't nearly as easy as you make it seem. For that to be a true option, the state first needs to invest in a massive institution capable of facilitating reintegration. There are literally generations of men out there who know nothing but fighting and dying in the name of "religion"; many of them have also been addicted to opiates from a young age. From a purely psychiatric stance, these people can't realistically be expected to re-join a functional society. There is of course the counter argument to this I've encountered which says...but an overwhelming majority of these people are only seasonal radicalists, where they only spend a few months from the year doing active fighting, so all they have to do is stay in their homes for the few extra months. Granted the fact about the seasonal participation is true (corroborated by Ahmed Rashid's research team this past 2 years); but the problem with the argument itself is that it over looks the fact that even during their "civilian time" these people are living in dysfunctional societies where the social fabric itself has been denuding steadily over a period of 3 decades. The possibility of someone born and raised in this environment to enter a society which is governed by a rule of law in a hierarchal governmental system lies somewhere between slim and nil.
An entire rehabilitation institutional set up is required which is capable of handling (on a large scale) everything from basic evaluation, psych eval- therapy- counseling, adult education, special education (given the significant correlation between learning disabilities and exposure to opiates at a young age), sex education, trade schools etc. Mind you, an entire network of such institutions are needed if the possibility of some people to actually rejoin society is to be realized.
In all fairness, if this option can't be presented, you might as well go ahead and bomb everyone.
Alongside military action there needs to be long term social assistance and welfare in FATA to bring them into the national fold.
What plan is there towards achieving this?