bobo6661
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2014
- Messages
- 854
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Basically. But go ahead and keep sucking on natos teet. Im sure they are telling you the truth
ok ok we get it there is only one truth putin truth...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Basically. But go ahead and keep sucking on natos teet. Im sure they are telling you the truth
Still no substantive argument.
You put forward a theory by a (self proclaimed? In any case with unverifiable credentials) Romanian expert, which you proclaim to be the truth. I gave a list of the arguments mentioned in the article and countered to them, based on what I've been able to verify and consider factual (in my admittedly limited capacity as humble citizen depending on open source material). I suggest, you show where propaganda in that is, connected with specific NATO statements and published standpoints pls. At no point have I attempted to assign blame to any one particular party or another and I challenge you to quote me where I did. I also indicated I do not proclaim to know what exactly happened and will withhold judgement at least untill more is known e.g. after official investigations come to a close and reports are published. You yourself have not come up with anything substantive in support of the theory you yourself put forward and you have consistently sought to attack the messenger (person) rather than address the message (topic). You handle/nickname sums up that behaviour quite accurately.Im still waiting on yours. Unless you call regurgitating nato propaganda as " substantive ".
Bottom line. Kiev fighter jet brought down that plane. Thats what all the evidence points at. But you can keep arguing natos point. I mean, if it makes you feel better.
You put forward a theory by a (self proclaimed? In any case with unverifiable credentials) Romanian expert, which you proclaim to be the truth. I gave a list of the arguments mentioned in the article and countered to them, based on what I've been able to verify and consider factual (in my admittedly limited capacity as humble citizen depending on open source material). I suggest, you show where propaganda in that is, connected with specific NATO statements and published standpoints pls. At no point have I attempted to assign blame to any one particular party or another and I challenge you to quote me where I did. I also indicated I do not proclaim to know what exactly happened and will withhold judgement at least untill more is known e.g. after official investigations come to a close and reports are published. You yourself have not come up with anything substantive in support of the theory you yourself put forward and you have consistently sought to attack the messenger (person) rather than address the message (topic). You handle/nickname sums up that behaviour quite accurately.
Your words, this thread. All else is off topic.So no wonder the NATO clowns and their tin pot dictator clammed up about MH17 after Russia showed evidence of a Ukie fighter shadowing the civilian airplane.
It looks like the plane was shot down by an air to air missile. And 30mm cannon fire.
Boeing-777 was downed by Ukrainian MiG-29, Romanian expert says | The Millennium Report