How nice is it to have a Jew trying his best, with his very limited intellect and rhetorical abilities, to justify calls for bloodshedding and collective punishment of men, women and children in Gaza. "Bloodlust is not bloodlust when it is a Jew that calls for mass deaths of Muslims" -- brilliant! Should I make the point here -- or is it already too obvious? -- that people like you (people who never tire to ***** about "hate" and "radicalism" in Islam, people who ascribe those sentiments as part of the very essence of what is being an Arab and a Muslim) are themselves proof that such qualities are at the very least as common among Israelis, Westerners and Jews? that, in fact, it is even more disgusting when such rhetoric appears in people like you than among the Talibans? At least the Talibans (God bless their honesty!) know who they are. But not you -- you portray yourselves as superior human beings, civilized, tolerant, all the while the you entertain genocidal fantasies against your victims. You can't see pure, naked hate-mongering for what it is only because it is you who engage in it.
Myself, I see Palestinian blood as being at least as precious as Jewish blood. So if you ever catch me praising Hitler's Holocaust, remember to NOT call me on my own BS, considering that, in your self-righteous, bloodthirst rant above, you've shown yourself to be morally as refined as an Aryan supremacist in the 40s.
There's never been a carrot to Gaza -- there's only been continual shelling, destruction of infrastracture, siege, and arbitrary constraints on freedom of movement and on life. That's why Israel has been under its own measure of shelling, alberit one much more limited than the one with which it castigates Gaza. And by God, there will continue to be such shelling. It will because Palestinians are not like Jews -- Palestinians have never been a people to submit, to cower, to immigrate and to run away: they're instead a people of staying put and fighting back, and as long as there's an oppressive Israel there will be a Palestinian fighter.
The people I'm bombing should pay me their money!
You're such the stereotypical Jew: even while your army bombs homes, destroys wells, brings down schools, media centers and hospitals -- you can never let the mind off the pocket, can't you? You are already thinking of all the material gains you can make off the people you oppress -- the people whose lands you have stolen and whose country you're destroying. How noble, the Jewish character.
Israel hasn't paid for all the things it has destroyed now, or those that it brought down in has destroyed before -- in Operation Cast Lead, for example. It hasn't paid for the wells, the homes, the hospitals, the ambulances, or the schools it intentionally blew up. It receives a lot of money from abroad, but none of it Israel uses to aid the victims of its own war crimes. Where's the carrt, then?
ANd why should Palestinians, who have received far more damage than caused it, compensate for a thing -- they who are already blockaded, unemployed, food insecure, because of Israel's siege and perpetual shelling of Gaza? Grow a heart and a head, you. Israelis aren't the only ones suffering, and they aren't even close to being the ones suffering the most.
Israel's invincible and its shelling of babies is justified to establish deterrence!
Minds smarter and more learned than yours have argued for the exact opposite: Israel likes to claim a deterrence against an enemy, where none exists, or where it is a mutual deterrence that hs been achieved. Hamas shelling on Israel decreased after Operation Cast Lead, true, but so did Israeli shelling of Gaza. Even worse in Lebanon: it appears that a unilaterial deterrence has been achieved, one by Hezbollah against Israel.