Very good points. But who are you trying for these things? Wake me when you can even kill a makhi for these crimes. I will fully support taking actions against people who allowed drone strikes and did not take action against TTP/AT/LeT combined.
40,000 people died and you don't consider it terrorism but you can convert a minor case to terrorism case.
There is no love lost between me and the GHQ but I do respect the uniform, GHQ and Islamabad are making stupid decisions together. A soldier HAS to follow chain of command, no matter what.
I'm yet to give an opinion on whether or not such extreme bisti of the armed forces is a good thing or not, you know denying basic rights to council... After all we are all pissed off about so many things by this military, its okay if we get to screw them a little too right? So what if we convert a small case into a terrorism case? So what if we subject him to be judged by the same judge who they are saying was put under house arrest by him... So what if there's some prejudice in these cases? The armed forces deserves this right?
- Point is that these decisions were taken by Musharraf whose primary identity is that of a COAS. Why didn't he face any resistance from core commanders or soldiers? We can't just put aside these issues. Why is it that Musharraf found supporters who helped him in coup? Why didn't he face any resistance from within PA against allowing foreign troops within Pk or allowing a foreign powers to conduct operations in Pk? COAS can do anything and get away with that.
- Secondly Islamabad is hardly making any decision related to war on terror or Afghanistan or even USA. Zardari simply removed himself from anything which was related to PA, his cronies make sure to hammer this point in their interviews. That is why public at large do not buy Zardari/ USA alliance stories.