What's new

BJP leader Chandan Mitra gets trolled for calling BJP Twitterati ‘jobless’

ghanta it is !!

in fact socialism/communism and progressive thought in india has actually seen resurgence via the acts of bjp government and the sangh generally, so one must thank the sangh. :)

how can such a perfection-seeking and gentle ideal like communism be dead?? how can anti-human ideology like capitalism ( and its propagators like the sangh ) be celebrated shamelessly by someone??



come on, i was just giving a technical fact.

did modi ever cry for the martyred farmer gajendra singh or for the delhi young lady who was "honor killed" by her parents?? all he did was go to this country and that country and make speeches about how india is so great.
India is a federal state!! It has a federal structure for a reason!! Pm need not comment on each and everything...there are local government bodies...and state government above it!! It's their responsibility!! I pretty sure you know this...but you are saying this hate for either Hindus or modi!! Just admit it you are doing this out of hate!!! Then I rest my case!!
 
.
India is a federal state!! It has a federal structure for a reason!!

and i do not accept india's state political arrangement to be anything but anti-democracy and anti-scientific.

the reason india has this arrangement/structure is because india's non-socialist leaders in 1947 could not devise a proper system so ended up directly adopting the british "parliamentary/representative democracy" system.

this[1] is how true democracy ( direct democracy ) is attempted.

---

[1] The Green Book - Part One

Pm need not comment on each and everything...there are local government bodies...and state government above it!! It's their responsibility!! I pretty sure you know this

what is the prime minster for then if he does not comment and cry about two cases that define the wrongness and oppression of india's economic, social and political system??

and both these cases happened in the country's capital... if modi cannot talk about them, how is he fit to talk about anything in other parts of the country??

but you are saying this hate for either Hindus or modi!! Just admit it you are doing this out of hate!!! Then I rest my case!!

bhai jaan, the two victims i spoke of were hindu, is it not??
 
.
and i do not accept india's state political arrangement to be anything but anti-democracy and anti-scientific.

the reason india has this arrangement/structure is because india's non-socialist leaders in 1947 could not devise a proper system so ended up directly adopting the british "parliamentary/representative democracy" system.

this[1] is how true democracy ( direct democracy ) is attempted.

---

[1] The Green Book - Part One



what is the prime minster for then if he does not comment and cry about two cases that define the wrongness and oppression of india's economic, social and political system??

and both these cases happened in the country's capital... if modi cannot talk about them, how is he fit to talk about anything in other parts of the country??



bhai jaan, the two victims i spoke of were hindu, is it not??
Lol you are trying to be smart here...i was not referring to the cases you pointed out!! Though you ingeniously selected those two cases to be on safe ground in an argument!!
Just say it! You hate modi and Hindus!! Because I can feel your hate!!:D
 
.
Lol you are trying to be smart here...i was not referring to the cases you pointed out!! Though you ingeniously selected those two cases to be on safe ground in an argument!!
Just say it! You hate modi and Hindus!! Because I can feel your hate!!:D

sigh... what can i say?? :girl_wacko:

i have been talking on pdf about farmer gajendra singh since his death and i have not been calling for "sharia state" or anything like that but for a complete socialist transformation of india, quite opposite to how you want to present me.

and you do not admit that there are many hindus who reject modi, bjp and sangh. :)

-------------

banned @sankranti is back so soon as @Shankranthi and lurking on this page. :lol:
 
.
sigh... what can i say?? :girl_wacko:

i have been talking on pdf about farmer gajendra singh since his death and i have not been calling for "sharia state" or anything like that but for a complete socialist transformation of india, quite opposite to how you want to present me.

and you do not admit that there are many hindus who reject modi, bjp and sangh. :)
Now don't try to portray me as anti Muslim...Lol I'm in my friend's house who happens to be a Muslim...and forward thinker like me:P....he loves the decisiveness of modis government!
 
. .
Now don't try to portray me as anti Muslim...Lol I'm in my friend's house who happens to be a Muslim...and forward thinker like me:P....he loves the decisiveness of modis government!

if you and your your friend like the "decisiveness" of modi and see him a a cog in the wheel of india's development and prime ideologue of "sab ka saath sab ka vikas", start a campaign to get him to disassociate himself from the sangh.
 
.
Or to subramanian swami.
or to .... mani shankar aiyar.☺️☺️

if you and your your friend like the "decisiveness" of modi and see him a a cog in the wheel of india's development and prime ideologue of "sab ka saath sab ka vikas", start a campaign to get him to disassociate himself from the sangh.
there should not be any problem, him being associated with the sangh, provided that he doesnt dance on their tunes (which is highly unlikely) or he should exercise strict control over its extra judicial activities, n reprimand them to keep them in check (n this should be done without the involvement of presstitutes).
 
.
if you and your your friend like the "decisiveness" of modi and see him a a cog in the wheel of india's development and prime ideologue of "sab ka saath sab ka vikas", start a campaign to get him to disassociate himself from the sangh.
Dissociation? When did he associated himself with sangh? If you want to dwell in the past so be it...when did he after becoming the PM associated or supported RSS rhetoric?
at least know what you are hating first!!
 
.
Dissociation? When did he associated himself with sangh? If you want to dwell in the past so be it...when did he after becoming the PM associated or supported RSS rhetoric?
at least know what you are hating first!!

since modi's inauguration as prime minister, the chief of rss, mohan bhagwat, was allowed to make speech twice on doordarshan tv channel, which is a semi-government national channel... what to make of that??

and only two months ago was a rss-arranged gathering[1] ( "chintan baithak" ) in which much of the bjp government was meant to attend...
Officially the three-day meet between the Modi government and Sangh Parivar is for the “exchange of notes”. With all top ministers, leading functionaries of the ruling BJP and of all constituents of their ideological fountainhead, RSS present under one roof at Madhyanchal Bhawan in Delhi for such an extended period, the meet surely has far bigger ramifications.
RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat had earlier cautioned Parivar affiliates to restrain themselves in their criticism of the Modi government and pleaded that it be given reasonable amount of time before making an assessment on which way the government was heading.
A look at the list of governors appointed by Modi government after removing UPA appointees clearly suggests that those appointed to this high constitutional post are persons with strong RSS rooting and an austere living style. This list includes Ram Naik, OP Kohli, Balramji Das Tandon, Keshari Nath Tripathi, Padmanabha Balakrishna Acharya , Kalyan Singh, Vajubhai Rudabhai Vala, C. Vidyasagar Rao, Mridula Sinha and Ram Nath Kovind.


and then he and his ministers attended the gathering[2]...
Addressing leaders on the last day of the three-day coordination meeting between the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) here, PM Modi said his government was working for the development of all.
Stating that he is a proud member of the RSS, Modi said he hopes to continue to receive guidance from the Sangh.
Several Cabinet ministers of the Modi government made presentations at the meeting over the last three days prior to Modi's address.
The Congress had called the meet an attempt by the RSS and BJP to send across a message that the “remote control has turned into an overt control”.

“The actual boss is Mohan Bhagwat... This government is a puppet in the hands


there should not be any problem, him being associated with the sangh, provided that he doesnt dance on their tunes (which is highly unlikely) or he should exercise strict control over its extra judicial activities, n reprimand them to keep them in check (n this should be done without the involvement of presstitutes).

well, we can only move forward in contribution to a mass campaign to get rss and other sangh groups declared as terrorist groups and the entire sangh as a terrorist/reactionary movement... almost seven decades have passed and these groups are not only not banned but a new group seems to pop up every year or so.

so it would be better for modi to disassociate if he wishes the welfare and real development of indian society... he has that choice.

p.s : let us not get into the trap of declaring anti-sangh or neutral journalists in moralistic terms like "presstitutes"... let the bhakts use such terms to their own discredit.

------

[1] Keeping the Parivar close: Why RSS-Modi govt meet is more than just an 'exchange of notes' - Firstpost

[2] Govt has done good job, results will be visible soon: PM Narendra Modi at RSS-BJP meet | Zee News
 
.
since modi's inauguration as prime minister, the chief of rss, mohan bhagwat, was allowed to make speech twice on doordarshan tv channel, which is a semi-government national channel... what to make of that??

and only two months ago was a rss-arranged gathering[1] ( "chintan baithak" ) in which much of the bjp government was meant to attend...





and then he and his ministers attended the gathering[2]...








well, we can only move forward in contribution to a mass campaign to get rss and other sangh groups declared as terrorist groups and the entire sangh as a terrorist/reactionary movement... almost seven decades have passed and these groups are not only not banned but a new group seems to pop up every year or so.

so it would be better for modi to disassociate if he wishes the welfare and real development of indian society... he has that choice.

p.s : let us not get into the trap of declaring anti-sangh or neutral journalists in moralistic terms like "presstitutes"... let the bhakts use such terms to their own discredit.

------

[1] Keeping the Parivar close: Why RSS-Modi govt meet is more than just an 'exchange of notes' - Firstpost

[2] Govt has done good job, results will be visible soon: PM Narendra Modi at RSS-BJP meet | Zee News
Lol...if you say rss is reactionary...agreed!! But a terrorist organization??
On what basis? Just bcos you hate some one...doesn't make them terrorists!!!
 
.
Lol...if you say rss is reactionary...agreed!! But a terrorist organization??
On what basis? Just bcos you hate some one...doesn't make them terrorists!!!

if we want to go down the unnecessary step of technically proving rss to be involved in violence, the following[1] was said recently by a former inspector general of maharashtra, s.m. mushrif...
"RSS activists have been chargesheeted in at least 13 cases of terror acts in which RDX has been used. If organisations like Bajrang Dal are taken into the account, then the number of such cases goes up to 17," Mushrif said at an event in Kolkata.

"The RSS is India's number one terrorist organisation, there is no doubt on this," said Mushrif, referring to the 2007 Mecca Masjid bombing in Hyderabad, the 2006 and 2008 Malegaon blasts in Maharashtra and the 2007 Samjhauta Express bombings among others.

-----

[1] RSS India's number 1 terror group: Former Mumbai police officer - Times of India
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom