What's new

BJP is emerging as second-most preferred political choice for Muslim voters in India

Soumitra

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
8,415
Reaction score
-17
Country
India
Location
India
BJP is emerging as second-most preferred political choice for Muslim voters in India
Muslim voters know elections are not fought in TV studios & their voting pattern shows that.
HILAL AHMED Updated: 24 April, 2019 1:12 pm IST
Muslim-voters-696x392.jpg

Voters in Bulandshahr | PTI
Text Size:





As the 2019 election progresses, there are three questions people ask about the Muslim vote: Are Muslims enthusiastic to vote this time? Do they want the Narendra Modi government to get another chance? And are they going to do ‘tactical voting’ to defeat theBJP pan-India?

The popular perception is that religious polarisation, the race for ‘Hindu votes’ and the declining number of Muslim candidates in the last five years has reduced the significance of Muslims as a decisive voting community. But does it have any direct relationship with Muslim voting preferences?

Do they believe in the power of the vote?
CSDS-Lokniti’s pre-poll survey 2019 is a useful source to explore these questions. The survey was conducted in the last week of March 2019 among 10,010 respondents spread across 19states of India. Thirteen per cent of the respondents were Muslims.

Out of them, 85 per cent Muslims respondents said that they were likely to vote in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. This overwhelming enthusiasm for voting confirms that the prevailinganti-Muslim environment does not affect Muslim participation in political processes. It simply means that Muslims, like other marginalised communities – particularly the SCs and STs – still believe in the efficacy of their votes.

Voting-table-1.jpg

Arindam Mukherjee | ThePrint

Do they want Modi again?
Although the BJP has always been seen as a pro-Hindu party, it has nurtured a clear anti-Muslim image under the leadership of Narendra Modi and Amit Shah. The Modi government’s reluctance to control violent Hindutva politics is a signifier of Hindu majoritarianism. Most of the Muslim respondents, like other religious minorities, do not think that the Modi government should be given another opportunity.

However, a straightforward Hindu-Muslim and/or the minority-majority framework cannot help us in making sense of this anti-Modi Muslim response.

We must remember that 31 per cent Hindu respondents also feel that Modi government should not get another term. On the contrary, 26 per cent Muslims are in favour of the Modi government. This figure is very relevant because it demonstrates that Muslims are the second largest set of respondents who want the Modi government to back in power.

Voting-table-2.jpg

Arindam Mukherjee | ThePrint
Are they going to defeat BJP?
The BJP has never been the first choice of Muslim voters in India. According to the previous CSDS-Lokniti surveys, the Congress was the first preference for Muslim voters in the period 1996-2009. Although this trend continued in 2014, the Muslim vote share of the BJP increased quite significantly and went up to 9 per cent. The assembly elections that took place in the Modi era (2014-2018) also reveal that the BJP began to get some kind of electoral legitimacy among Muslims.

The recent pre-poll survey also confirms this trend. Although the Congress emerges as the main Muslim vote gainer, it does not affect the BJP’s prospects among Muslims. It reported that the BJP may get 14 per cent Muslim votes, which is going to be around 5 percentage points swing in its favour in comparison to 2014. In fact, the BJP is emerging as the second most preferred political choice for Muslims (along with BSP-SP combined).

Voting-table-3.jpg

Arindam Mukherjee | ThePrint


The party competition at the state level appears to be the most significant aspect that determines Muslim responses. The BJP would gain Muslim support in those states where it had a direct one-to-one contest with the Congress or any other party, especially in Gujarat. However, the regional picture this time might be quite different.

A majority of Muslims in Assam, Gujarat and Telangana clearly expressed their preference for the Congress. This trend exists in Bihar and Maharashtra as well, where the Congress is in alliance with other parties.

The BJP, on the other hand, is going to get the maximum Muslim support from three states—Rajasthan, Karnataka and West Bengal—where it did not have an adequate Muslim mass base in the past. The party is also likely to retain 14 per cent of Muslim votes in Uttar Pradesh, which is equal to the national average.

Voting-table-4.jpg

Arindam Mukherjee | ThePrint
This highly diversified and apparently non-committed Muslim response signal two important political facts.

First, political parties are made of individuals—not ideologies. In this sense, the BJP has emerged as the most powerful party and not just because of its stated ideology of Hindutva. On the contrary, the party has expanded its social base in every part of the country because a large number of powerful regional leaders, who had their own electoral mass base, have joined it.

The decline of Left parties in West Bengal and the disintegration of the Congress in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh (despite victory in the assembly elections) simply means that individual leaders of these parties have joined the BJP. These leaders continue to nurture their traditional Muslim support and as a result, the BJP is able to make effective linkages with Muslims voters.



Second, the discourse of election, which is dominated by the anti-Muslim narrative, is different from the actual mobilisation of voters at the constituency level. My recent fieldwork in different parts of UP, Bihar, Haryana and Delhi confirms that Muslims at the constituency level are being approached by all parties, including the BJP. In such a scenario, the so-called ideological distinction between the BJP and others disappears, and a highly localised form of political bargain begins between the candidates and Muslims voters.

Muslim voters’ rejection of provocative Hindutva is an important aspect of contemporary Muslim electoral attitude. But they are, it seems, more intelligent than others because they know that elections are not contested in TV studios or in big rallies.

https://theprint.in/opinion/bjp-is-...cal-choice-for-muslim-voters-in-india/225041/
 
. . . .
@Pan-Islamic-Pakistan Indian Muslims are just as Anti Pakistan like their hindu counterparts hence why I view the Kashmir dispute as a separate strategy

Classic case of Stockholm syndrome.

Indian Muslims are always taking up for Hindus, disparaging Kashmiris, and bashing Pakistan.

You see them in the West in the form of Fareed Zakaria, Aziz Ansari, and their ilk.

Kashmir dispute is Islamic in nature due to demographics. 95% of the Kashmir valley is Muslim. Ladakh has been flooded by Tibetan refugees to decrease percentage of Muslims. Jammu was ethnically cleansed of Muslims, and settled by Gujuratis.

Now they are trying to scare and frighten south Kashmiris with violence in preparation for Hindu settlement.
 
.
Classic case of Stockholm syndrome.

Indian Muslims are always taking up for Hindus, disparaging Kashmiris, and bashing Pakistan.

You see them in the West in the form of Fareed Zakaria, Aziz Ansari, and their ilk.

Kashmir dispute is Islamic in nature due to demographics. 95% of the Kashmir valley is Muslim. Ladakh has been flooded by Tibetan refugees to decrease percentage of Muslims. Jammu was ethnically cleansed of Muslims, and settled by Gujuratis.

Now they are trying to scare and frighten south Kashmiris with violence in preparation for Hindu settlement.

Kashmir is our racial cause as well plus Islamic we don't want a bunch of Southies and Gujarati ilk flooding the valley as the Indians are doing it plus what's this whole "Kashmiri Pandit" horse shit theories they are much darker than Kashmiri Muslims
 
. .
BJP is emerging as second-most preferred political choice for Muslim voters in India
Muslim voters know elections are not fought in TV studios & their voting pattern shows that.
HILAL AHMED Updated: 24 April, 2019 1:12 pm IST
Muslim-voters-696x392.jpg

Voters in Bulandshahr | PTI
Text Size:





As the 2019 election progresses, there are three questions people ask about the Muslim vote: Are Muslims enthusiastic to vote this time? Do they want the Narendra Modi government to get another chance? And are they going to do ‘tactical voting’ to defeat theBJP pan-India?

The popular perception is that religious polarisation, the race for ‘Hindu votes’ and the declining number of Muslim candidates in the last five years has reduced the significance of Muslims as a decisive voting community. But does it have any direct relationship with Muslim voting preferences?

Do they believe in the power of the vote?
CSDS-Lokniti’s pre-poll survey 2019 is a useful source to explore these questions. The survey was conducted in the last week of March 2019 among 10,010 respondents spread across 19states of India. Thirteen per cent of the respondents were Muslims.

Out of them, 85 per cent Muslims respondents said that they were likely to vote in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. This overwhelming enthusiasm for voting confirms that the prevailinganti-Muslim environment does not affect Muslim participation in political processes. It simply means that Muslims, like other marginalised communities – particularly the SCs and STs – still believe in the efficacy of their votes.

Voting-table-1.jpg

Arindam Mukherjee | ThePrint

Do they want Modi again?
Although the BJP has always been seen as a pro-Hindu party, it has nurtured a clear anti-Muslim image under the leadership of Narendra Modi and Amit Shah. The Modi government’s reluctance to control violent Hindutva politics is a signifier of Hindu majoritarianism. Most of the Muslim respondents, like other religious minorities, do not think that the Modi government should be given another opportunity.

However, a straightforward Hindu-Muslim and/or the minority-majority framework cannot help us in making sense of this anti-Modi Muslim response.

We must remember that 31 per cent Hindu respondents also feel that Modi government should not get another term. On the contrary, 26 per cent Muslims are in favour of the Modi government. This figure is very relevant because it demonstrates that Muslims are the second largest set of respondents who want the Modi government to back in power.

Voting-table-2.jpg

Arindam Mukherjee | ThePrint
Are they going to defeat BJP?
The BJP has never been the first choice of Muslim voters in India. According to the previous CSDS-Lokniti surveys, the Congress was the first preference for Muslim voters in the period 1996-2009. Although this trend continued in 2014, the Muslim vote share of the BJP increased quite significantly and went up to 9 per cent. The assembly elections that took place in the Modi era (2014-2018) also reveal that the BJP began to get some kind of electoral legitimacy among Muslims.

The recent pre-poll survey also confirms this trend. Although the Congress emerges as the main Muslim vote gainer, it does not affect the BJP’s prospects among Muslims. It reported that the BJP may get 14 per cent Muslim votes, which is going to be around 5 percentage points swing in its favour in comparison to 2014. In fact, the BJP is emerging as the second most preferred political choice for Muslims (along with BSP-SP combined).

Voting-table-3.jpg

Arindam Mukherjee | ThePrint


The party competition at the state level appears to be the most significant aspect that determines Muslim responses. The BJP would gain Muslim support in those states where it had a direct one-to-one contest with the Congress or any other party, especially in Gujarat. However, the regional picture this time might be quite different.

A majority of Muslims in Assam, Gujarat and Telangana clearly expressed their preference for the Congress. This trend exists in Bihar and Maharashtra as well, where the Congress is in alliance with other parties.

The BJP, on the other hand, is going to get the maximum Muslim support from three states—Rajasthan, Karnataka and West Bengal—where it did not have an adequate Muslim mass base in the past. The party is also likely to retain 14 per cent of Muslim votes in Uttar Pradesh, which is equal to the national average.

Voting-table-4.jpg

Arindam Mukherjee | ThePrint
This highly diversified and apparently non-committed Muslim response signal two important political facts.

First, political parties are made of individuals—not ideologies. In this sense, the BJP has emerged as the most powerful party and not just because of its stated ideology of Hindutva. On the contrary, the party has expanded its social base in every part of the country because a large number of powerful regional leaders, who had their own electoral mass base, have joined it.

The decline of Left parties in West Bengal and the disintegration of the Congress in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh (despite victory in the assembly elections) simply means that individual leaders of these parties have joined the BJP. These leaders continue to nurture their traditional Muslim support and as a result, the BJP is able to make effective linkages with Muslims voters.



Second, the discourse of election, which is dominated by the anti-Muslim narrative, is different from the actual mobilisation of voters at the constituency level. My recent fieldwork in different parts of UP, Bihar, Haryana and Delhi confirms that Muslims at the constituency level are being approached by all parties, including the BJP. In such a scenario, the so-called ideological distinction between the BJP and others disappears, and a highly localised form of political bargain begins between the candidates and Muslims voters.

Muslim voters’ rejection of provocative Hindutva is an important aspect of contemporary Muslim electoral attitude. But they are, it seems, more intelligent than others because they know that elections are not contested in TV studios or in big rallies.

https://theprint.in/opinion/bjp-is-...cal-choice-for-muslim-voters-in-india/225041/

So it's a survey. What was the method of survey, and what was the population of survey?
 
.
.
Kashmir is our racial cause as well plus Islamic we don't want a bunch of Southies and Gujarati ilk flooding the valley as the Indians are doing it plus what's this whole "Kashmiri Pandit" horse shit theories they are much darker than Kashmiri Muslims

They don't view their commonality with us as a racial issue. It is all Islamic for them. This is why the actual Kashmiri separatists who are not religious or don't believe in Islam in politics tend to be anti-Pakistan.
 
.
They don't view their commonality with us as a racial issue. It is all Islamic for them. This is why the actual Kashmiri separatists who are not religious or don't believe in Islam in politics tend to be anti-Pakistan.
Point is we do have commonalities with them nevertheless and their ethnic replacement is our concern I find the whole Pandit crap to be annoying
 
. .
Point is we do have commonalities with them nevertheless and their ethnic replacement is our concern I find the whole Pandit crap to be annoying

Also there were only as estimated 300,000 Pandits who left the Valley (out of a total population of 6.5m) But you will have Hindutva loons who regularly spread lies about ‘our millions of Kashmiri Pandits’

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashmiri_Pandit

The Kashmiri Pandit are also direct descendant of the Hindu Dogra Army which used the Kashmiri Muslim as a slave labour and whipped Muslim women in the fields to keep them in line.

https://www.kashmirobserver.net/2018/feature/struggle-begun-1585-got-new-lease-life-1931-34075
 

Attachments

  • 242765B3-01EB-4644-A7C5-96C501FC66C2.jpeg
    242765B3-01EB-4644-A7C5-96C501FC66C2.jpeg
    203.6 KB · Views: 235
.
What does your terrorist leader Golwalkar taught? He and Savarkar taught to kill Muslims and Christians to create Hindu Rashtra, Hindu punya bhumi, right? You Hindutva turds vote RSS-BJP for what? For that Godhra killings right? You secretly loves to see more Muslim, Christian die. You are real beasts RSS-BJP cadres and those leaning towards it. http://www.stopfundinghate.org/resources/rssprimer.htm
 
.
Point is we do have commonalities with them nevertheless and their ethnic replacement is our concern I find the whole Pandit crap to be annoying

Look, for example at the leaders of All parties Hurriyat Conference (the most reputable nonviolent, popular Kashmir separatist organization.)

Both Mirwaiz Omar Farooq (new, main faction) and Yasin Malik (JKLF) have made anti-Pakistan statements in the past. Actually, lack of Pakistani help or any support pushed many Kashmir leaders to start demanding a totally independent Kashmir, without India or Pakistan. They falsely equated lack of Pakistani help as a sign of complicity with India. Mirwaiz is more of a nationalist than a religious leader, while Yasin Malik was a former nationalist militant. Neither is completely anti-Pakistani, but wary of us due to our lack of a concrete policy on Kashmir.

sOR9e4gN.jpg

Mirwaiz Omar Farooq

yasinmalik-1509716833.jpg

Yasin Malik

Whilst the eldest leader, religious scholar, and head of a different faction of APHC, Syed Ali Shah Geelani, has been an adamant pro-Pakistan Kashmiri resistance leader. He has left no stone unturned in supporting Pakistan at any junction. He is the main leader who pushed Kashmiris to bring Pakistani flags to protests, bury their dead in Pakistani flags, to chant the nara "Pakistan ka matlab kya? Pakistan se rishta kya?," and push for union with Pakistan as a matter of religious doctrine.

.jpg

Syed Ali Shah Geelani

It was also because of the dominance of other groups (like the two mentioned previously) in the 90s and 2000s that Pakistan was hesitant to support Kashmiris 100%, as it may have meant a fully independent Kashmir with loss of Pakistani territory in addition an Indian exit.

It was only until Burhan Wani's rise and shahadat that the pro-Pakistan cause in Kashmir was re-ignited. Now, all anti-Pakistan or Pakistan-sceptic Kashmiri groups and leaders have had to re-evaluate themselves in light of the valiant Hezb ul Mujahideen leader. Kashmir is now firmly in the Pakistani camp.

Cm2te0eWgAA0qHJ.jpg:large

Shaheed Burhan Wani

This is why India has become so brutal in its oppression of Kashmiris, as it sees Kashmir slipping from its grasp. It is only a matter of time now before Kashmir merges fully with Pakistan. India can only delay it.
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom