What's new

Big Shock to India: G20 Boycott: Many Countries refuse to go to Indian Occupied Kashmir in Srinagar

The Eagle

SENIOR MODERATOR
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
24,239
Reaction score
258
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan

China, Turkey likely to skip G20 summit in IIOJK​

Pakistan is hoping that Saudi Arabia and Indonesia may follow suit



Kamran Yousaf May 18, 2023


a man paints a wall with the g20 logo in the region s main city of srinagar photo afp

A man paints a wall with the G20 logo in the region's main city of Srinagar. PHOTO: AFP

ISLAMABAD:
China and Turkey are unlikely to attend the controversial G20 meeting on tourism in Srinagar in a move that would be seen as some diplomatic victory for Pakistan, which is opposing Indian attempts to portray the normalcy in the disputed region.

India, the current president of G20, is set to host the meeting on tourism from May 22 to May 24. It is going to be the first major global event in the disputed region particularly after India unilaterally revoked the special status of the Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) in August 2019.

G-20 comprises rich nations plus the European Union. The intergovernmental bloc accounts for 80 per cent of the world’s gross domestic product (GDP).

Countries which have close ties with Pakistan are part of the grouping. Those include China, Turkey, Indonesia and Saudi Arabia.

Since India decided to host the tourism meeting in Srinagar, Pakistan launched a diplomatic offensive to counter the New Delhi’s move. Pakistan’s efforts have achieved partial success as China and Turkey are believed to be not sending their delegates to the Srinagar meeting, according to official sources.

Pakistan is hoping that Saudi Arabia and Indonesia may follow suit. Similarly, other countries given the sensitivity of the issue are only sending their diplomats based in New Delhi to the event.

There has been no official confirmation from the foreign office.

However, Pakistan’s former ambassador to India Abdul Basit said his sources confirmed that China and Turkey would stay away from the G20 meeting in Srinagar.

“My sources tell me China and Turkey are not attending G20 meeting in Srinagar. Almost all other countries are sending their Delhi-based diplomats to the meeting. I expect Saudi Arabia and Indonesia to also show solidarity with Kashmiris,” Basit wrote in a tweet.

While Indian government is trying to show all is well in the disputed territory, independent experts believe that this can’t brush the issue under the carpet.

Fernand de Varennes, the United Nations special rapporteur on minority issues, on Monday issued a statement accusing India of seeking to normalise the “brutal and repressive denial of democratic and other rights of Kashmiri Muslims and minorities” by holding a G20 meeting in the disputed region.

He said the situation in Kashmir “should be decried and condemned and not pushed under the rug and ignored”.

“The government of India is seeking to normalise what some have described as a military occupation by instrumentalising a G20 meeting and portray an international ‘seal of approval’,” Varennes said in the statement shared on Twitter.

The UN expert said “massive human rights violations” have been reported in Kashmir since it came under New Delhi’s direct rule. “These included torture, extrajudicial killings, denial of political participation rights of Kashmiri Muslims and minorities,” he said.

“The G20 is unwittingly providing a veneer of support to the façade of normalcy at a time when massive human rights violations, illegal and arbitrary arrests, political persecution, restrictions, and even suppression of free media and human rights defenders continue to escalate,” he added.

 
. . .

China opposes G20 meeting in Indian-rule Kashmir and will skip it​

Reuters
May 19, 20237:59 PM GMT+8

4FBLQF4NV5P73HFGRYSHMQMP2E.jpg

A member of India's military force stands guard at the G20 foreign ministers meeting in New Delhi, India March 2, 2023. Olivier Douliery/Pool via REUTERS

NEW DELHI, May 19 (Reuters) - China said on Friday that it is opposed to a G20 tourism meeting next week in the disputed Himalayan territory of Kashmir in India and will not attend.

India, which holds the chair of G20 this year, has organised a series of meetings across the country in the run-up to the summit in New Delhi in September.

"China is firmly opposed to holding any kind of G20 meetings in disputed territory, and will not attend such meetings," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin said.

In 2019, India split the Muslim-majority state of Jammu and Kashmir to create the two federal territories of Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh.

A large chunk of Ladakh is under Chinese control.

Ties between New Delhi and Beijing have been strained since a military clash in Ladakh in 2020 in which 24 soldiers were killed.

Srinagar, the summer capital of Jammu and Kashmir, will host a meeting of the tourism working group for G20 members on May 22-24.

Kashmir is claimed in full but ruled in part by nuclear-armed neighbours India and China-ally Pakistan, which has also opposed India's decision to hold a G20 meeting in Kashmir.

India has countered the objection saying it is free to hold meetings on its own territory. It said on Friday peace and tranquility on its border is essential for normal ties with China.

 
.
It is just a ex ambassador’s opinion/view with a clickbait headline

I don’t think rest of the world cares .This summit is not a big deal for them ..just a tourism related meet that may not even make inner pages of newspaper
 
. . . . . .
Thanks China, its our nation cause and brother China giving us the support.
While our own ruling elite and corrupt generals are so loyal to the West and the US and they are attending the conference, got to show where our own establishment honour and loyalties lie.
Thanks to Allah we are not in the G20 otherwise Bilawal or Shabaz may have gone to attend the conference too.
 
.
It's a G2 world, G20 is nothing to start with.
So it should pose no problem to China if the insignificant rest develop better relations amongst themselves for trade and mutual economic gain.

Win win really.
 
.
From Indian occupied to Indian rule? Anyways, still probably better than occupied Pakistan.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom