Big Shame for Whole Muslim Ummah

[Solomon2]

Please, lets not stick to a HeC letter as some divine proof of brainwashing -

Any approach to judgment that starts out with, "Let's throw away inconvenient facts because they contradict my desired outcome" has no moral validity.

 

[SQ8]

Are you people listening to a jew lecture you on caliphate? His supporting evidence is the word of a man who's forefathers betrayed the Caliphate and established today's serf states. They are being cheered on by Iranian extremists, the very people who attacked the Calipha when he had besieged the gates of Vienna.

Allah's messenger warned us about such people.

Anas ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “There will be division and sectarianism in my nation and a people (the Kharijites) will come with beautiful words and evil deeds. They will recite the Quran but it will not pass beyond their throats. They will leave the religion as an arrow leaves its target and they will not return to it as the arrow does not return to its bow. They are the worst of the creation. Blessed are those who fight them and are killed by them. They call to the Book of Allah but they have nothing to do with it. Whoever fights them is better to Allah than them.”

Know your history, know your deen, otherwise you will fall into the traps of your enemies.

The first caliphate was established in Medinah by the Prophet Muhammad pbuh. It is his sunnah. The righteous examples of caliphate are Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman and Ali (ra). Nobody who is Muslim, Shia or sunni will find fault in the sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad pbuh. Anyone who leads you astray from it is your enemy, whatever thier so called Ideology, wealth, status, or piety might be.

I disagree with considering the Caliphate as Sunnah. This modern fitna thanks to hydra like terrorist organizations such as Hizb ut Tahrir seem to have zero concept of logical reasoning when connecting the dots in their history.

The term khilafat is from Khalifah which is arabic for representative. The Prophet established a state and never referred to it as a Khilafat himself. Since he was referred as a Khalifa of Allah on earth, Hazrat Abu Bakr who is considered closest to him was given the title Khalifa ur Rasool(or similar) to strengthen his legitimacy.
The term Khalifa was used much before the prophet in Arabia for official purposes and even during his time.

That is the Khilafat name the first Islamic state Recieved. The sunnat is not to call youself a Khalifa or to elect a leader the way those earlier tribal and logical customs(based on the times) were followed.

The prophet’s life is an example on what to do in such and such situations and not must do. Otherwise we all should live in mud houses which we construct ourselves and go spend a year in a cave or go into exile into a desert valley.

Sadly, political and uneducated religious leadership ambitions have ruined both Hadiath and existing records of the Prophets life which is why both extremism and confusion prevails in Islam.

If the Prophet was sent to the Chinese and he established his rule there he would be called in the Chinese language and his first rule would be established closely with Chinese customs and everyone would be going to Xinxiang and Mecca.

 

[Ceylal]

What haramis the arabs have become

Always been that way..We witnessed it more due to technology..

He was put in a bad situation asked by Jewish journalist do you believe in Israel's right to exist...had he said no it would be foreign policy blunder and he'd risk too much controversy. He said if both peoples have a state it would be fine. Which is basically the Arab Peace Initiative. Then he went on to say they could have mutual interests in event of Israel agreeing to two state solution. Which is also reflective of Arab Peace Initiative. However, American/Jewish/Israeli media tried spinning it off as him accepting Israel's current policies and ignoring the Palestinian aspect which is misrepresenting. It shows they only care to advance their agenda and want to prevent Palestinian independence.

He should be carful next time interviewing with them.

Here another sellout coming to the rescue....Palestinian of MB obedience are the best 6 th street dwellers..

any comments from our saudi fanboys, their numbers seem to thinning these days ? @chauvunist

Just one with many accounts..
We still see Selman F, SC, Mahatir to name some...JKangoroo just closed in on him , and put in the cooler...

So wher is the 500 million Arab boy ahahah. The war against iran vs ksa/israel is getting closer. Ksa is warming up, we as Turkey should prepare us, ther will be a lot of refugees coming to us. We should send them to Europe.

To France this time... and make of Macron a Macaroon..

Only one in history of arab

The only Sauds that had a spine..Sadat betrayed him, and one of his son killed him...Remember Muslims with a spine, are always killed by a spineless Muslim....

 

[Qasim Amin]

We need another King Faisal, who would stop Saudi Arabia from doing this and frighten the west and Israel. Nowdays the Arab kings would sell themselves for Money and more money.

 

[Arsalan 345]

they are a disease on earth.they are basically son of jews who disguise themselves as muslims but we know their history and their self created religion.i don't care what they say.they don't represent muslims and i don't follow any fatwa from these jews.they can apply their fatwa in their palaces.

 

[Ceylal]

what do you want from saudis if jordan egypt and turkey have good relations with us.
and also some other countries no one mentiond

It is not the fact of having good relationships, It a fact this relationship is seen more as a vassalité , a surrender than anything else..Egypt , Jordan were paid to go against their own people, the Sauds is just a reigning family that is looking for protection..All the relationship that Israel has with an Arab State is a relation with a man or a family...in an other hand Israel doen’t have the peace he sought for...

 

[The SC]

The League of Nations' Palestine Mandate spelled it out pretty clearly: Arabs have property and civil rights but no inherent political rights. (Under Article 80 of the U.N. Charter any U.N. resolutions saying otherwise are garbage.)

Of course by the terms of the Mandate the Jews of Palestine were not to sacrifice their own civil rights to live in peace and security. The Arabs who objected by force or feet to Zionist rule, siding with the invading Arab armies, thus lawfully lost their rights to return to their former property; that was the Ottoman standard, and it was only because the Zionists were merciful that these Arabs did not suffer decimation as well. (And the Arabs who simply drifted into camps pretending to be Palestinians in return for a dole, shelter, and education have even less claim to Israeli territory.)

At the same time, the Jews in other parts of the Middle East were supposed to retain their property and civil rights. That did not happen: the Jews' wealth and property were wantonly seized by local rulers and they were driven out of Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq. Most of these Jews were shoved into a new Israel lacking infrastructure and Israel was close to starving due to the Arab trade boycott, so they were often settled on top of abandoned Arab villages, given a cow and seed, and told to make do as best they could: Israel narrowly avoided starvation as its population more than doubled in the decade after independence.

Clearly, the injustice suffered by these Jews was far greater than that "suffered" by intolerant Arabs - and the fact you acknowledge no measure of this shows how ill-prepared you are to pass justice on the Israel-Arab conflicts, yes?

So it is that Israel remains 20%+ Arab - the Arabs who didn't revolt retained their civil and property rights - whereas the surrounding states are Judenrein. Israelis, Arab and Jew alike, have spent the decades since independence building their communities and the Jewish State, enjoying freedom and seeking peace and prosperity rather than tyranny and conquest.

So "what about the rights of the Palestinian people to their own land"? They don't have any such rights anymore; their ancestors sacrificed them in fires of murderous hatred. While these Arabs may have a moral claim upon the European and Arab rulers who encouraged their revolt Israel doesn't owe them anything.

THIS narrative, here, that I've just recounted, unlike the one crammed into students' brains by the State of Pakistan, is a narrative that can be supported by facts in context. And once Pakistanis can fearlessly support such a narrative as well as criticize it then they may have a claim to wielding some sort of moral voice. Not before.

Sorry.. but the Jews ..or should I say the Zionists, have decimated the Palestinians with the help of England .. who has killed more than 40 000 armed Palestinian men on your part and handed you the key to Jerusalem..this played a huge part of Palestinians becoming refugees.. it was either this or they got killed..These facts are undeniable..Let's not talk about the UN of 1948.. and Where are those civil and proprietary rights you are talking about? what do you call this apartheid and settlements?

 

[Qasim Amin]

I see a pattern emerging here

 

[The-Hack]

I only feel pain for those Muslims or ANYONE else for that matter who feels pain for Pakistanis. Do Arabs/Paestinians feel any empathy or pain for Pakistanis? Be honest.

You are right sir,
than why Pakistan join Saudi led Muslim coalition force???

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

You are right sir,
than why Pakistan join Saudi led Muslim coalition force???

Money and financial support. Nothing else. Even satanists are more Islamic then the Saudi Royal family. Retarded Pakistani Mullah logic doesn't change this fact.

 

[Dinky]

The Al Sauds and gulf monarchs will hold fake meetings for Palestine and pretend to care while helping Israel under the table like they have always done.