Biden says US does not seek cold war with China

[MH.Yang]

So what is the personal worth of Xi? Zero?

It is Chinese communists and CCPs, not Xi, who lead us to success.

Xi is only a member of the CCP. Even without Xi, excellent CCPs can provide better leaders than Xi.

It is CCP that has made the cause of Xi, not Xi that has made the cause of CCP.

 

[casual]

If it was a hot war, you would know it.

China does know it.

 

[nahtanbob]

During the Cold War, China and the Soviet Union were not allies.

During most of the Cold War, China was a third party, independent of the Soviet Union and the United States. China has its own ideology, which is different from the Soviet Union.

Tell us the name of the party that rules China

 

[gambit]

It is Chinese communists and CCPs, not Xi, who lead us to success.

Xi is only a member of the CCP. Even without Xi, excellent CCPs can provide better leaders than Xi.

It is CCP that has made the cause of Xi, not Xi that has made the cause of CCP.

Marx said: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.

So why is Xi so wealthy?

 

[MH.Yang]

Marx said: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.

So why is Xi so wealthy?

How much wealthy is Xi? Can you provide the data?

And I just said that we are communists, not that China is now a communist country. We are not yet able to realize communism in China.

China is now in the primary stage of socialism, and communism is the advanced stage of socialism.

For example, China's state-owned enterprises account for 56% of the national enterprise economy. A true communist country should be close to 100%. The proportion of state-owned enterprises in China is even lower than that in Nordic countries. The proportion of state-owned enterprises in Sweden, Norway, Finland and other countries is more than 70%.

So we are still working hard, but we have not failed.

 

[Trango Towers]

How can you say 'can never' when we won the last Cold War?

The reason it was called 'Cold' was because of the ideological contest between the West and the Soviet/China alliance, of which, the former disappeared and your China abandoned the Marxist ideological foundation for capitalism. In essence, you lost.

Because last cold war was with an enemy that was isolated. Today's global economy is so intertwined that you will not be able to cope. Plus if China calls in her debt you American won't just lose but go bankrupt

 

[beijingwalker]

Marx said: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.

So why is Xi so wealthy?

Xi is wealthy? China haters attack him for different things, but it's the first time I heard someone calling him wealthy? How wealthy? like Trump?

 

[gambit]

How much wealthy is Xi? Can you provide the data?

And I just said that we are communists, not that China is now a communist country. We are not yet able to realize communism in China.

China is now in the primary stage of socialism, and communism is the advanced stage of socialism.

For example, China's state-owned enterprises account for 56% of the national enterprise economy. A true communist country should be close to 100%. The proportion of state-owned enterprises in China is even lower than that in Nordic countries. The proportion of state-owned enterprises in Sweden, Norway, Finland and other countries is more than 70%.

So we are still working hard, but we have not failed.

Xi's net worth will never be known, but suffice to say that he lives better than everyone else in China. You are avoiding the issue because it is ultimately an embarrassment to your claim. China is not socialist but an authoritarian capitalist state. SOEs are not signs of communism. The Nordic countries have SOEs as well as private companies. A true Marxist state would have no private companies and no private property. I doubt none of you guys on this forum believe in Marx.

Marx said: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.

How many of you are willing to live that way? None. And you know it.

 

[Menthol]

The world is extremely near to a great catastrophic event.

But if we can pass it in peace, we will have the so-called 1000 years of peace.

No more cold war plz, I 100% support Biden and hope USA will deliver the promise.

The whole world is going to have an extremely bright future.

 

[beijingwalker]

Xi's net worth will never be known, but suffice to say that he lives better than everyone else in China.

This was Xi demanded the government officials to do first thing after he came to power.

China to start making new officials disclose assets

China is to launch a pilot program to make new officials disclose their assets as part of an anti-graft campaign, the Communist Party's anti-corruption watchdog said on Friday.

www.reuters.com

 

[MH.Yang]

Xi's net worth will never be known, but suffice to say that he lives better than everyone else in China. You are avoiding the issue because it is ultimately an embarrassment to your claim. China is not socialist but an authoritarian capitalist state. SOEs are not signs of communism. The Nordic countries have SOEs as well as private companies. A true Marxist state would have no private companies and no private property. I doubt none of you guys on this forum believe in Marx.

Marx said: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.

How many of you are willing to live that way? None. And you know it.

In China, the debate needs to be based on two principles.
The first is "who advocates who provides evidence".
The second is "the presumption of innocence".

If you think Xi has a lot of property, you should provide evidence in accordance with the principle of "who claims who provides evidence".
If you have no evidence, then according to the principle of "presumption of innocence", we think Xi is innocent.

If the principles of Americans are different from ours, please tell us directly.
Does the USA need no evidence or directly presume that other people are guilty?

 

[etylo]

In China, the debate needs to be based on two principles.
The first is "who advocates who provides evidence".
The second is "the presumption of innocence".

If you think Xi has a lot of property, you should provide evidence in accordance with the principle of "who claims who provides evidence".
If you have no evidence, then according to the principle of "presumption of innocence", we think Xi is innocent.

If the principles of Americans are different from ours, please tell us directly.
Does the USA need no evidence or directly presume that other people are guilty?

What does a vietnamese pretending to be a white all the time in the US know about and doubt the personal wealth of chinese president Xi just as the west did with Putin not long ago ? Any credibility in his claim ?

 

[WarKa DaNG]

That means China, get ready you are next

 

[gambit]

In China, the debate needs to be based on two principles.
The first is "who advocates who provides evidence".
The second is "the presumption of innocence".

I guess this does not apply to political prisoners in China.

Marx said: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.

How many PDF Chinese are actually living this way? If none, then do not call China communist or socialist or whatever flavors of them.

 

[MH.Yang]

I guess this does not apply to political prisoners in China.

Give evidence to prove your point.