Bengladeshi Opinion of Kashmiris

[zombieland]

I think Kashmiris are not seriously serious. So they are still under Indian hegemony. They need inspirations from BD about how to get busted emotionally, be strongly integrated and fight until goal their achieved. But there is no possibility without direct the intervene of Pakistan and China. I think there is no peaceful solution on Kashmir Issue but some wars or random suicide attacks.


Anyway, Kashmir Issue has not comparison with Baluchistan Issue. It's the Bharatis making fuss in air.

Here we have one bongie who is 'seriously serious' (Shakespeare would have definitely twitched in his grave).

Dude would you please mind your own business ... there are two 'elderly' countries (Pakistan and India) who are involved in it. We really don't want any form of suggestion from you guys atleast.

 

[LEGENDARY WARRIOR]

please read this

Azadi not main concern in Kashmir, Islam is: Jamaat

Srinagar: Kashmir's grand old religious-cum-political outfit Jamaat-i-Islami, which is the parent party of Hurriyat hawk Syed Ali Shah Geelani, on Monday said that the propagation of religion, and not the pursuit of politics and power, is its primary concern, and hence, the struggle for Azadi is secondary for it.

Azadi not main concern in Kashmir, Islam is: Jamaat

"Jamaat was primarily founded for the propagation of religion. Our first duty is to fulfil this obligation. Resolution of Kashmir is secondary for us," Jamaat Amir Sheikh Ghulam Hassan told The Indian Express.

"However, as a party we have to respond to the evolving situation and day-to-day problems. Kashmir is one such problem and we seek its peaceful settlement," he added.

The Jamaat's assertion is significant, as it seems to dissociate itself from the separatist narrative, despite being at the forefront of political groundwork for the separatist movement in 1989. Now Jamaat's leaders are seen addressing only religious gatherings.

Hassan said there was no ban on the propagation of religion. "We can continue with our primary job of spreading the message of Islam. The Constitution of India doesn't bar it. Otherwise, how could Jamaat-i-Islami, Hind, function in this country?," he said.

for more visit this link
Azadi not main concern in Kashmir, Islam is: Jamaat - 1 - National News

how do you expect them to follow Islam with Indian forces over there.

You just posted the link and think that Kashmiris can implement Islam in a state where oppression takes place.
Well let me tell you that if Islam is the concern then Islam instructs to carry out Jihad against the brutal. . .

And right now India is the brutal part

 

[tallboy123]

I think Kashmiris are not seriously serious. So they are still under Indian hegemony. They need inspirations from BD about how to get busted emotionally, be strongly integrated and fight until their goal achieved. But there is no possibility without direct the intervene of Pakistan and China. I think there is no peaceful solution on Kashmir Issue but some wars or random suicide attacks.


Anyway, Kashmir Issue has no comparison with Baluchistan Issue. It's the Bharatis making fuss in air. And whether India would agree or not, Bangladeshis can talk for Kashmiris for it's legacy and our Muslim brotherhood.

when did Bangladesh become India @1971.........

Please go to ur Govt and ask them to intervene then we will reply to ur govt........
Till then just watch as an audience...

 

[Agnostic_Indian]

^actually we can co relate both but we are not allowed to do so in this thread and most probably in a dedicated thread too.

 

[integra]

I think India will NEVER EVER give up Kashmir,its the source of water to the north..
we don't care about Kashmiris(WHO PROTEST AND STONE PELTERS),they can go where ever they want...
If other peaceful Kashmiris can live peacefully and allow development to take place..

that's the reality....

Sigh! The way you are saying it, makes me wonder if someday we would bomb the damn Farakka dam.

 

[LEGENDARY WARRIOR]

Here we have one bongie who is 'seriously serious' (Shakespeare would have definitely twitched in his grave).

Dude would you please mind your own business ... there are two 'elderly' countries (Pakistan and India) who are involved in it. We really don't want any form of suggestion from you guys atleast.

@Zombieland

This is your 18th post and you have started instructing people when to post and when not to.

Anyone can post on this issue and because BD is a Muslim country, they have full right to talk about Kashmiri freedom. ..

 

[Skies]

Here we have one bongie who is 'seriously serious' (Shakespeare would have definitely twitched in his grave).

Dude would you please mind your own business ... there are two 'elderly' countries (Pakistan and India) who are involved in it. We really don't want any form of suggestion from you guys atleast.

p1. There is no mistake.
p2. Your countryman wanted our ideas and views. If you are able to solve then why your country ask US to intervene? And do you know what liberated us? That was our firm determination and busted emotion.

ANyway, I think for having hyper sensitivity, Pakistanis lose many things.

No reply to any element. Over.

 

[tallboy123]

Sigh! The way you are saying it, makes me wonder if someday we would bomb the damn Farakka dam.

nice joke...

Wat would happen to Bangladesh after that...????

u have any idea Mr.Dreamer???

 

[punit]

I have few Kashmiri (Muslims) friends and they are anything but Indian. Now you can disagree for the sake of disagreement but you know it is the truth.

Even i have some Bangladeshi ( muslim ) friends and they are anything but razakars . Now you can disagree for the sake of disagreement but you know it is the truth.

 

[Masterchief]

@thread starter: please edit your thread, The people of Bangladesh are known as Bangladeshi not Bengali.

 

[saleen_s7]

India does not care what most people think, thats why its a democracy. LOL. anyways
Having said that, back in 1947, the partition was mainly due to religious segregation. Regardless of what indians believe and the little bubble indians live in, its a stone written fact that pakistan has been formed due to different religious beliefs. Therefore, if Kashmir being an independent state is not an option, it belongs to pakistan by default.
Offcourse anyone who doesn't share the same beliefs with India is a terrorist and automatically qualifies as radical militant and will be soon banned much like kashmiris.

 

[Wonderer]

India does not care what most people think, thats why its a democracy. LOL. anyways
Having said that, back in 1947, the partition was mainly due to religious segregation. Regardless of what indians believe and the little bubble indians live in, its a stone written fact that pakistan has been formed due to different religious beliefs. Therefore, if Kashmir being an independent state is not an option, it belongs to pakistan by default.
Offcourse anyone who doesn't share the same beliefs with India is a terrorist and automatically qualifies as radical militant and will be soon banned much like kashmiris.

Why dont u first merge your Muslim Bangladesh with Pakistan to start with because "back in 1947, the partition was mainly due to religious segregation"

 

[Roybot]

its a stone written fact that pakistan has been formed due to different religious beliefs. Therefore, if Kashmir being an independent state is not an option, it belongs to pakistan by default.
Offcourse anyone who doesn't share the same beliefs with India is a terrorist and automatically qualifies as radical militant and will be soon banned much like kashmiris.

Just so you know, India was formed in 1947 for people of all faith and religion, not just for Hindus. When 160 million Indian Muslims can live in India, I don't see why 4 Million Kashmiri Muslims would have issues practicing their religion under Indian governance. So basing this Kashmiri secessionist demands on religious grounds will be unfruitful, as it has been for all these years.

Kashmiris should blame the Pakistanis if anyone for this pickle they are in now. If the Pakistanis hadn't attacked the Independent Kingdom of Jammu and Kashmir it would have never ceded to India, and eventually the King would have made way for democracy, like Nepal. And what do you know the Kashmiris would have had their independent country which would have included, the Gilgit Baltistan province of Pakistan,and the rest of Jammu and Kashmir.

 

[Skies]

Why dont u first merge your Muslim Bangladesh with Pakistan to start with because "back in 1947, the partition was mainly due to religious segregation"

The matter was to be separated from India in 1947, that means separated from Hindus, and still it is - as we are separated from India. The matter is not to be with Pakistan only. Understand? So spare Kashmir.

Anyway, just wonder, even after having a bloody war, we still have well extant of brotherhood between Pak-BD. That is also good, we will intensify our brotherhood more in future. Hope you wont be any trouble for us!

 

[LaBong]

The matter was to be separated from India in 1947, that means separated from Hindus, and still it is - as we are separated from India. The matter is not to be with Pakistan only. Understand? So spare Kashmir.

It must be tough being a Hindu in Bangladesh.