What's new

Beijing concerned over increasing cost of security of CPEC: Chinese state media

Status
Not open for further replies.
Beijing has received a note of caution about pushing its USD46 billion economic corridor to Pakistan from an unlikely source.

An article published in a Communist Party-run newspaper on Tuesday suggested to the Chinese government that it would be "unwise to put all its eggs in one basket", and that it should look more to new
markets in Southeast Asia rather than put in billions into unrest-hit Pakistan.

"It is unlikely that China will change its supportive attitude on the CPEC [China Pakistan Economic Corridor] in the short term, but the increasing cost of security is becoming a big problem in efficiently
pushing forward the projects," said the article published in the Global Times, a tabloid owned by the official People's Daily, authored by reporter Hu Weijia.

Ads by ZINC

QUESTIONS RAISED ON CPEC VIABILITY

It isn't often the case that the Chinese media suggests to Beijing that it go slow when it comes to a country that is increasingly being seen in China as its only ally.

Many Chinese experts and companies are known to have privately raised doubts on the viability of the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which connects the restive Xinjiang province, through
Azad Kashmir (Azad Kashmir), to the Gwadar port on the Arabian Sea in Balochistan.



The plan, which envisages widening the Karakoram Highway and possible rail links and gas pipelines, not only passes through some of the world's most difficult terrain but also through areas grappling with unrest, from Azad Kashmir to Balochistan.

The Global Times warned, "The economic corridor.. passes through some turbulent regions, Kashmir included. It is unlikely to be plain sailing for China and Pakistan in their attempts to push forward the
CPEC due to challenges such as the complex regional environment, and people in the two countries should be prepared for potential setbacks".

On Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's assurances that the CPEC was a top priority for the government, the paper said, "However, given the difficulty of protecting the personnel that are working in Pakistan,
projects under the CPEC may need to be implemented and assessed step by step."


SHIFT FOCUS TO SOUTHEAST ASIA

"This does not mean that China should give up on the idea of the CPEC because of the present challenges," it added. "However, China may not want to put too much focus on the region. At the very least, it would
be unwise to put all its eggs in one basket."

It proposed that Beijing should instead "consider giving more attention to its economic cooperation with Southeast Asian countries". The CPEC has long been seen as a flagship project in China's Belt and Road initiative, but the initiative's strategic focus may need to shift gradually toward Southeast Asia, where there is a wide infrastructure funding gap but a relatively stable regional environment that will enable China to efficiently push forward ventures under the Belt and Road initiative," it suggested, specifically mentioning Vietnam, whose prime minister is currently on a six-day visit to China.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...hina-pakistan-economic-corridor/1/763102.html
 
. . .
Terrorism issue is a very serious in past many Chinese have been attacked in Pakistan few days ago in an incidents police attacked Chinese . Cpec will need a very serious security I guess
 
.
Is int the Chinese media to a large extent controlled by the Govt?
 
. . . .
Global times which published this article is the CCP's mouth piece.

:rofl:

The Global Times is a controversial populist tabloid that is significantly more conservative than actual government policy, or mainstream media.

Just read the thread title again, and try to understand what you just wrote. If they are the CCP's mouth piece, why are they arguing against the CCP's policy?

Can you explain your logic?
 
.
:rofl:

The Global Times is a controversial populist tabloid that is significantly more conservative than actual government policy, or mainstream media.

Just read the thread title again, and try to understand what you just wrote. If they are the CCP's mouth piece, why are they arguing against the CCP's policy?

Can you explain your logic?

According to its editor in chief:


China’s most belligerent tabloid, theGlobal Times, is certainly a one-of-a-kind publication. The Chinese- and English-language news outlet is published by the ruling Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) paramount mouthpiece, the People’s Daily, but it goes much further than China’s typically stodgy state news. The Global Times is best known for its hawkish, insulting editorials—aggressive attacks that get it noticed, and quoted, by foreign media around the world as the “voice” of Beijing, even as the party’s official statements are more circumspect.

That’s not exactly a mistake, the paper’s longtime editor says.

The Global Times often reflects what party officials are actually thinking, but can’t come out and say, editor-in-chief Hu Xijin explained during a long interview with Quartz in his drab Beijing office in the People’s Daily compound. As a former army officer and current party member, Hu said, he often hangs out with officials from the foreign ministry and the security department, and they share the same sentiments and values that his paper publishes. “They can’t speak willfully, but I can,” he said.

http://qz.com/745577/inside-the-global-times-chinas-hawkish-belligerent-state-tabloid/
 
.
The President of China wants CPEC to succeed. Even though it is not as transparent as a democracy - he must have political opponents at home. Perhaps the Chinese members can shed light on this. They might want to mess with his legacy. All said and done, it is pretty foolish to bet on Pakistan.
 
.
According to its editor in chief:


China’s most belligerent tabloid, theGlobal Times, is certainly a one-of-a-kind publication. The Chinese- and English-language news outlet is published by the ruling Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) paramount mouthpiece, the People’s Daily, but it goes much further than China’s typically stodgy state news. The Global Times is best known for its hawkish, insulting editorials—aggressive attacks that get it noticed, and quoted, by foreign media around the world as the “voice” of Beijing, even as the party’s official statements are more circumspect.

That’s not exactly a mistake, the paper’s longtime editor says.

The Global Times often reflects what party officials are actually thinking, but can’t come out and say, editor-in-chief Hu Xijin explained during a long interview with Quartz in his drab Beijing office in the People’s Daily compound. As a former army officer and current party member, Hu said, he often hangs out with officials from the foreign ministry and the security department, and they share the same sentiments and values that his paper publishes. “They can’t speak willfully, but I can,” he said.

http://qz.com/745577/inside-the-global-times-chinas-hawkish-belligerent-state-tabloid/

I'm starting to get the impression that you didn't even read a single line of that. Since it basically said exactly the same thing I said.

The Global Times is not representative of Chinese Government policy. Which, obviously, is why they are arguing against Government policy in the original source. :lol:
 
.
So !!!! is the chinese govt trying to send a message ? if so to who ?

Some ccp cadres sending a message to other cadres most likely.

I'm starting to get the impression that you didn't even read a single line of that. Since it basically said exactly the same thing I said.

The Global Times is not representative of Chinese Government policy. Which, obviously, is why they are arguing against Government policy in the original source. :lol:

It's published by the official mouth piece of the ccp..The people's daily.
 
.
:rofl:

The Global Times is a controversial populist tabloid that is significantly more conservative than actual government policy, or mainstream media.

Just read the thread title again, and try to understand what you just wrote. If they are the CCP's mouth piece, why are they arguing against the CCP's policy?

Can you explain your logic?
The Chinese poster above is right, dont take everything from Gobal times seriously. They issue warning almost every week to India and others, had they been mouthpiece of CCP we would have seen some action.
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom