What's new

Beg, borrow or steal: IAF chief's advice to defence scientists

ramu

BANNED
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
0
NEW DELHI: "Beg, borrow or steal", was the advice the Indian Air Force (IAF) chief, Air Chief Norman Anil Kumar Browne, had for defence scientists Wednesday for developing critical technologies for the armed forces.

Browne, who was delivering a lecture at an aerospace seminar organised by the Institute of Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA) here, was attempting to impress upon the defence scientists the need to develop an engine for indigenous fighter aircraft that has not happened for almost three decades.

"You may have to beg, borrow or steal. But you have to do it," Browne said to stress that there was an urgency in locally developing the indigenous aeroengine if India has to strengthen it defence capabilities.

India had tasked its Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) 22 years ago to develop an indigenous engine and till date has sanctioned a budget of Rs.2,893 crore (over $500 million) for its development.

Yet, the Kaveri engine programme, envisaged as the aeroengine for the indigenous Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) is still to fructify and the LCA is fitted with the American GE engine.

"This (aeroengine) is an area where we need to focus. This is one of the core technologies required by the nation," he emphasised.

The Kaveri engine was a couple of months ago tried out on a Russian Ilyushin-76 transport aircraft test bed. It will go through further trials before being integrated on any military aircraft.

Another key technology that Browne highlighted as an critical need for the IAF was the latest Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, which he wanted Indian defence scientists to develop indigenously.

India's planned acquisition of 126 combat jets for which the tender is likely to be finalised this fiscal will come with AESA radars of European origin.

Browne said development of the AESA radar indigenously would give better intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities for the IAF's planes and the commanders alike.

These capabilities and technologies were needed, he said, as IAF's area of responsibility was now not confined within the land boundaries of India, but expanded way beyond the Indian Ocean region.

Beg, borrow or steal: IAF chief's advice to defence scientists - The Times of India
 
.
He must have taken a leaf out of the Chinese.LOL !
 
.
00204_171728.jpg


Air Chief Marshal NAK Browne during an aerospace seminar organised by the Institute of Defence Studies and Analyses was attempting to impress upon the defence scientists the need to develop an engine for indigenous fighter aircraft that has not happened for almost 30 years.
 
. . . . .
Wait!!I thought LRDE did develop AESA radars-the L band Sword Fish and S ban AWACS.They recently mastered GaN transmitters.So what is NAK Browne talking about??
 
. .
Nobody cares what Air Chief says unless GOI also saying the same thing.
It does not work that way. If DRDO produces the best MBT but Indian army does not think it is good enough then inspite of the good work from DRDo, they will get nothing.

In the same way, IAF is the customer and DRDO and other labs are the product builders. GoI is more a regulator and a platform provider.

What IAF chief says holds immense value for DRDO.
 
. .
am pleased pakistan has been accused by indians in the past of deploying these tactics. nust be a case of cant beat them join them lol
 
. .
am pleased pakistan has been accused by indians in the past of deploying these tactics. must be a case of cant beat them join them lol
mhm, for NUCLEAR TECH, Big difference there kiddo, but then again you may not understand.

also, the aesa tech we have is for awacs and ground radars. Its getting it in the nose of a plane thats the problem. The cooling and the power required means little waste. having a massive radar on the ground and anving a tiny one in the nose of the lca without losing too much range ect. is a big deal.

I think the title is kina outta countext. I think he meant to convey the urgency of the matter but if you look at it, he didnt mean to ask the drdo guys to take foreign materials and weapons apart. There is a reason that people will sell to us and not our neighbors.

Many people dont actually understand how big a problem getting an engine working well is. One Lockheed martin scientist put it as : its taking the propultion of a destroyer an fitting it into a plane. Even china is STILL buying russian engines because despite the fact that their engines work, like the kaveri, they are not as reliable or have as long a life as the russian engines, something that the soviets spent ALOT of effort on after getting their hands on western engines.
 
.
am pleased pakistan has been accused by indians in the past of deploying these tactics. nust be a case of cant beat them join them lol

You must be really guilty ... nobody even criticized you of anything in this thread yet you come here to confess!!!
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom