Beautifull and most sacred Chruches in india

[Bombaywalla]

Oh this sliced off drum barrel shape is aesthetically pleasing now, is it? Mind numbing hallucinatory imagery taking over a space meant for meditative spiritually uplifting experience is what goes for composition, symmetry, and architecture now, huh? Gosh we are heading towards a planet of morons with individuals like this around.

LOL you're a moron. Go yap elsewhere.

 

[Indrani]

LOL you're a moron. Go yap elsewhere.

Gladly, there is no conversation happening here. I may get more intelligent responses from the cacti on my fence wall than you.

 

[SpArK]

Mateer Memorial Church
,
TrivandruM.

C.S.I. Mateer Memorial Church, started in 1838 in Trivandrum, is one of the oldest congregations in South India.

Mateer Memorial Church - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Bombaywalla]

I may get more intelligent responses from the cacti on my fence wall than you.

get a job, lunatic.

 

[abjktu]

Gladly, there is no conversation happening here. I may get more intelligent responses from the cacti on my fence wall than you.

nim mane alli aDige maadodu yaaru??...neevu maadalva??

 

[Indrani]

nim mane alli aDige maadodu yaaru??...neevu maadalva??

Mom. Avara manne pakkadalle idde.

get a job, lunatic.

I just took a break from nonstop working. I can well afford it.

 

[INDIC]

Yeah. Why do you not enlighten me then.

Also what is incongruous is statues of the Greek gods. Funnily enough the bronze statues from 450 BCE seems eerily similar to the cast bronze statues which were popularized in 5th century CE. No air bubbles no imperfect finishes for what was a 1000 year old non-cast bronze statues to differentiate it from cast bronze statues. Also no change in artwork patterns. All the same perfection from start to finish spanning over a millennium.

Your history about India is very immature, you need to learn more about it, 4000 old Indian statues in Vietnam not possible. Your mexicans are Indians was the most moronic of all.

 

[Indrani]

Your history about India is very immature, you need to learn more about it, 4000 old Indian statues in Vietnam not possible. Your mexicans are Indians was the most moronic of all.

4000 year old statues was maybe a mistake for 4 BCE. Mexicans look like Indians, behave like Indians. The hypothesis was aired by someone else and not me, all I wanted was a discussion on that. Also seeing a pattern emerge over which kind of people readily take to Indian culture and thinking versus people who abhor every aspect of it is certainly interesting. Is it not strange that Mexicans and Peruvians, people we hardly spare a thought about in India, of their own develop intense liking and fascination of a country not known to be rich or powerful or white? What is it that makes them gravitate towards India and its culture while at the same time no matter how many times you try to make an American white (majority of them) watch a Hindi movie or a song or whatever, they run for cover.

What I see is you are a close minded person whose thinking capacity has been muted by our education system.

 

[gslv mk3]

ears ago was debunked by european scholars.
It is just a fabrication of some zealous zealots like Devianayagam and Archbishop Arulappa as was described in the pages i posted this theory was contested and lost in Madras High court in 1975.
It is not about Europeans not being able to digesting the fact Christianity in any other part of the world but Fabrication of history by some theologians.

It is just a fabrication of some zealous zealots like Devianayagam and Archbishop Arulappa as was described in the pages i posted this theory was contested and lost in Madras High court in 1975.

All of these are about claims by Latin catholic hierarchy ( who now control church the at Mylapore,who want to 'market St.Thomas ).Truth is Tamil Christians had nothing to do with St.Thomas and are related to Portuguese missions.

And a book that states 'a Pahlavi inscribed cross is surely Manichean' is a ridiculous source..

Perhaps you should look at what i posted.

 

[wolfschanzze]

All of these are about claims by Latin catholic hierarchy ( who now control church the at Mylapore,who want to 'market St.Thomas ).Truth is Tamil Christians had nothing to do with St.Thomas and are related to Portuguese missions.

And a book that states 'a Pahlavi inscribed cross is surely Manichean' is a ridiculous source..

if it's ridiculous then go prove it wrong, it has cited scholarly articles and research work along with it,prove the author wrong, he can be contacted any time on facebook and Twitter.

 

[gslv mk3]

if it's ridiculous then go prove it wrong, it has cited scholarly articles and research work along with it,prove the author wrong, he can be contacted any time on facebook and Twitter.

Huh,do it for yourself.Go check about Manichaeism & Pahlavi language for yourself.Many historians have studied these old stone crosses,and concluded that the inscriptions were christian..Anyway when did Manicheans started to use crosses ?

 

[abjktu]

Mom. Avara manne pakkadalle idde.

Nimma mane ya pakkaddalli jana idhaaraa??...yenu paapa maadidaano avaru???hehehe...

 

[wolfschanzze]

Huh,do it for yourself.Go check about Manichaeism & Pahlavi language for yourself.Many historians have studied these old stone crosses,and concluded that the inscriptions were christian..Anyway when did Manicheans started to use crosses ?

I have posted the pages with proof and citations it is for you to prove it wrong, since you claim christianity and those crosses were real.
I have posted how those crosses were fabricated and how they lost the case in Madras High court.
Scared of getting the lies exposed?

 

[gslv mk3]

I have posted the pages with proof and citations it is for you to prove it wrong, since you claim christianity and those crosses were real.
I have posted how those crosses were fabricated and how they lost the case in Madras High court.
Scared of getting the lies exposed?

Who told you those crosses were proofs of St.Thomas origin theory ?They aren't - They shows an existing christian community around 7th century Kerala,related to Persian churches.

Perhaps you should look at what i posted.

Absolute BS.The relationships of Syrian Christians of Kerala with Church of East in Iraq is pretty much proved.

Anyway,Historians who doubt the 'St.Thomas origin theory' (like MGS Narayanan) accept the existence of a christian community related to Persian church.

 

[wolfschanzze]

Who told you those crosses were proofs of St.Thomas origin theory ?They aren't - They shows an existing christian community around 7th century Kerala,related to Persian churches.



Absolute BS.The relationships of Syrian Christians of Kerala with Church of East in Iraq is pretty much proved.

Anyway,Historians who doubt the 'St.Thomas origin theory' (like MGS Narayanan) accept the existence of a christian community related to Persian church.

Christianity in india is not 2000 year old as you claim and that has be proven wrong multiple number of times, why do people still stick to that theory when it was proven wrong 30 years ago.