What's new

'Baseless rhetoric about Pakistan totally unacceptable': foreign secy tells US ambassador

RangeMaster

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 25, 2016
Messages
1,647
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Updated November 20, 2018
Facebook Count9
Twitter Share

6
5bf3cc212d139.jpg

US President Donald Trump said Pakistan doesn't "do a damn thing for [US]" in a televised interview. — File photo

The foreign secretary on Tuesday summoned United States Chargé d'Affaires (CdA) Ambassador Paul Jones to register a strong protest against the "unwarranted and unsubstantiated allegations made against Pakistan" by US President Donald Trump over the last two days.

According to a press statement, Foreign Secretary Tehmina Janjua conveyed the "government's disappointment on the recent tweets and comments by the US president". The US CdA was told that such baseless rhetoric about Pakistan was totally unacceptable.

Rejecting the insinuations about Osama bin Laden made by Trump, Janjua reminded Jones that it was Pakistan’s intelligence cooperation that provided the initial evidence to trace the whereabouts of bin Laden.

President Trump, while talking to Fox News on Sunday about the reasons for ending the over a billion dollar annual aid for Pakistan, said the country didn’t do “a damn thing for us”. He raked up allegations of global terror kingpin having lived in Pakistan with relative ease. “But living in Pakistan right next to the military academy, everybody in Pakistan knew he was there,” said Trump.

He then repeated the same allegations in his tweets the next day, saying the US no longer pays billions of dollars in aid to Pakistan "because they would take our money and do nothing for us".

Prime Minister Imran Khan hit back at Trump in a series of tweets. "Pakistan has suffered enough fighting US's war. Now we will do what is best for our people & our interests," he said.

“Trump’s false assertions add insult to the injury Pak has suffered in US WoT in terms of lives lost & destabilised & economic costs. He needs to be informed about historical facts."

'Baseless allegations'
According to the statement issued on Tuesday, the foreign secretary told the US official that no other country had paid a heavier price than Pakistan in the fight against terrorism. "The US leadership had acknowledged on multiple occasions that Pakistan’s cooperation had helped in decimating the core Al-Qaeda leadership and eradicating the threat of terrorism from the region.

"The US must not forget that scores of top AQ [Al-Qaeda] leaders were killed or captured by active Pakistani cooperation. Pakistan’s continued support to the efforts of international community in Afghanistan through Ground/ Air and Sea lines of communication was unquestionably critical to the success of this Mission in Afghanistan.

"In the wake of recent US pronouncements to seek political settlement in Afghanistan, Pakistan and the US were working in close coordination with other regional stake holders in order to end the prolonged conflict," added the statement. "At this critical juncture, baseless allegations about a closed chapter of history could seriously undermine this vital cooperation."

Pak-US ties dip to new low
The premier on Monday led the sharp reaction by political leaders to Trump’s tirade against Pakistan by hinting at review of foreign policy options and asking the US president to introspect on the real reasons for America’s failure in Afghanistan.

“Instead of making Pakistan a scapegoat for their failures, the US should do a serious assessment of why, despite 140,000 Nato troops plus 250,000 Afghan troops & reportedly $1 trillion spent on war in Afghanistan, the Taliban today are stronger than before,” PM Khan said in one of his four tweets in response to Trump’s remarks.

PM Khan reminded Trump that Pakistan’s support for the US in the war on terror cost it 75,000 casualties and over $123 billion in financial losses, tribal areas were devastated because of terrorist attacks and millions of people were displaced because of counterterrorism operations that had to be carried out to reclaim the area from terrorists.

Although US aid for Pakistan had been on decline since the last years of President Barack Obama as the strategic misalignment of the two countries grew, it was after Trump’s New Year tweet accusing Pakistan of “lies and deceit” that the security aid was ended.

Trump has been consistent in his criticism of Pakistan since he launched his South Asia and Afghanistan strategy despite multiple attempts made by the two governments to fix the problems in their ties.

While Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi, who has been spearheading the most recent attempt at rebooting US ties, had appeared optimistic about progress in ties after his meetings with American leaders, Trump’s latest remarks indicate that underlying irritants that have kept the relationship unstable remain unaddressed.
 
. .
Never in my life I experienced such a resilient and dignified response from Pakistan to uncle sam. Good job :)[/i].
Remember they are not giving us any financial support anymore... to mufat main to hamare qoom apnay mann bapp ke bhe nahi sunti :sarcastic:.... besides that pakistan has opted the block of Russia china and it is the right decision, American are losing every where and this is just one more blow to their international dominance they are out of middle east, central asia and now from south asia curtsy to Donald trump
 
.
Response is fine and indeed this is the first time i have seen any one from the FO to actually call the US ambassador and tell him to shutup. However i think this has gone too far and something needs to be done that should send pains to Washington. How about slapping duties on US cargo for starters. Let there be no free lunches anymore.
 
.
How about slapping duties on US cargo for starters. Let there be no free lunches anymore.

I don’t think its possible under current financial crisis Pakistan is facing. We will just stick to verbal protests, nothing else.
 
.
Never in my life I experienced such a resilient and dignified response from Pakistan to uncle sam. Good job :)
PPP govt even did better job with stopping supply lines.
if this govt will do the same or at least increase duties then i would say a befitting response all other things are just rhetoric from both sides totally immature.
 
. .
Trump has no sense - no question about it - but is American state out of senses as well? Where is explanation on part of America to ease tension? If Pakistan pulls its corridor's access for Americans in Afghanistan (and Pakistan may be considering on the side lines) then is America prepared to run from Afghanistan using Iranian route?

The only possible leverage USA has over Pakistan is economic though IMF - and that too is dwindling away from its control. Pakistan will be out of its economic crunch within next few months at most - so what should happen to Americans in Afghanistan and its designs in South Asia?
 
. .
I don’t think its possible under current financial crisis Pakistan is facing. We will just stick to verbal protests, nothing else.
The only part US will play in our existing crisis will be to stop IMF from lending which is why PM is trying to get as much leverage by going to sources other than IMF for bail out. However slapping duties on US cargo will only add to the national exchequer. Why should it be allowed to go for free when A) US does not appreciate at all and 2) it is giving us financial loss.
 
.
I don’t think its possible under current financial crisis Pakistan is facing. We will just stick to verbal protests, nothing else.

Bang on target sir.

In fact, I shall go a step further and suggest that the public posturing done, IMF bailout is needed. You will see a 'kowtow' faster than I could type this :)

That is the hard fact.

However i think this has gone too far and something needs to be done that should send pains to Washington. How about slapping duties on US cargo for starters. Let there be no free lunches anymore.

Pakistan is currently our 56th largest goods trading partner with $6.4 billion in total (two way) goods trade during 2017. Goods exports totaled $2.8 billion; goods imports totaled $3.6 billion. The U.S. goods trade deficit with Pakistan was $766 million in 2017.


https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/south-central-asia/pakistan

Merely wondering, who will have the pains?
 
.
Trump has no sense - no question about it - but is American state out of senses as well? Where is explanation on part of America to ease tension? If Pakistan pulls its corridor's access for Americans in Afghanistan (and Pakistan may be considering on the side lines) then is America prepared to run from Afghanistan using Iranian route?

The only possible leverage USA has over Pakistan is economic though IMF - and that too is dwindling away from its control. Pakistan will be out of its economic crunch within next few months at most - so what should happen to Americans in Afghanistan and its designs in South Asia?
Pentagon differs from Trump and they are trying to control the damage and they have rather appreciated the role played by Pakistan. If IK had not tweeted, the Pentagon would stay silent but now they have come forward which is a good sign. I don't think the situation should go beyond a certain point but definitely it was absolutely necessary to reply to this orange potato.
 
.
Pakistan is currently our 56th largest goods trading partner with $6.4 billion in total (two way) goods trade during 2017. Goods exports totaled $2.8 billion; goods imports totaled $3.6 billion. The U.S. goods trade deficit with Pakistan was $766 million in 2017.


https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/south-central-asia/pakistan

Merely wondering, who will have the pains?

Please! I am aware of all this and if you think this is going to continue for a long time you are sadly mistaken. Next in line for Trump administration will be to block Pakistani trade items or slap duties on it. The only reason this hasnt happened yet is because of the ongoing trade war with China. Otherwise if US can slap duties on Canada and EU, where do you think Pakistan stands?
Besides why is it wrong to charge for something? Can you explain that to me specially with someone who tells you that you dont do a damn thing.
As for the hard fact another hard fact for you is that entire US and NATO supplies go through Pakistan.
 
.
Trump has no sense - no question about it - but is American state out of senses as well? Where is explanation on part of America to ease tension? If Pakistan pulls its corridor's access for Americans in Afghanistan (and Pakistan may be considering on the side lines) then is America prepared to run from Afghanistan using Iranian route?

The only possible leverage USA has over Pakistan is economic though IMF - and that too is dwindling away from its control. Pakistan will be out of its economic crunch within next few months at most - so what should happen to Americans in Afghanistan and its designs in South Asia?


Let me give it a slight twist.

Why, in your opinion, is US after Iran right now? Let me further give it a twist, why do you think that there is high decibel racket against Iran yet exemptions on trade with Iran being given? Trump is, after all, as per his own statement, a deal maker? Could it be that he is trying to wrest concessions from Iran?

Let me hypothesize, why do you think, in spite of rhetoric in favor of Saudis and against Iran, is US not de-stabilizing Iran? I have seen some members from Pakistan here mention about a desire for Sistan-Baluchistan integration. Pakistan would be a willing party, for obvious reasons.
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom