What's new

Banned Kashmiri militant outfits re-emerging in Pakistan

Status
Not open for further replies.
I said full protection to all Kashmiris (of all religions). It is you who only talked of Muslims while conveniently ignoring the plight of Kashmiri pandits who were told to leave the valley from mosque loudspaeakers leaving their womenfolk behind!.

You take in all the BS the indian media gives you.......kashmiri pandits where never told to leave kashmir...loudspeaker told to leave there womanfolk..:rofl:

These troops are there to protect the Kashmiris from terrorists coming from a foreign country (even this thread talks about where the recruitment is taking place, doesn't it? And I have read about these foreign terrorists not trusting local Kashmiris whom they supposedly want to liberate). Even the ever ungrateful Hurriat ******** like Gilani (who is only alive because Indian doctors saved him) are protected by Indian soldiers from the foreign terrorists.!.

The freedom fighters are there to protect the local population from the indian army.

Once the violence stops there will be no need for any troops. And any unintentional human right activities will stop too.

But it seems, the supposed himayatis of Kashmiris don't want peace to return and people to live in peace.

Once you "indian army" leave then there will be no problem and peace will return.
 
. .
You have not got a clue what you are talking about.
My family came from IOK and moved to mirpur....like a large minority of people in AJK who are all from IOK.

I believe you on face value but you said minority right?
Mirpuris are distinct from Kashmiris and akin to Punjabis..
 
.
You take in all the BS the indian media gives you.......kashmiri pandits where never told to leave kashmir...loudspeaker told to leave there womanfolk..:rofl:

Kashmiri Pandit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As per the statement of US Congressman Joe Wilson, beginning in 1989, mosques in Kashmir declared jihad and blared warnings from loudspeakers to the Hindus that they were infidels and had to leave Kashmir. He further says that "From 1989-1990, Islamists began a terror campaign to drive Hindus from Kashmir"7. Some people have noted that some Kashmiri Muslims were tolerant of minorities, but since partition, most Kashmiri Muslims have adopted a more conservative approach to Islam, and since 1989, a more militant and fundamentalist approach.

Sumit ONLINE » Between Worlds - By Radhika Kaul

But the final trigger was pulled in 1989-90. In those two defining years and thereafter, a terrorist had the licence to kill, burn, and rape people – as long as they were Hindus. The same loudspeakers which would call the Muslim faithful for namaz, then screamed – “Pandits, leave the valley; with the men, but without your women.”

If I were you I would be ashamed to see my religious places being misused for terror. But you see an occassion to :rofl:

I guess people like you need to act "peaceful and tolerant" only in front of western audiences. Else you are ever ready to show the true colors.

I already know your response to this.

The freedom fighters are there to protect the local population from the indian army.

Atrocities in Kashmir

Terrorism has taken the lives of more than 2000 innocent men, women and
Innocent victims of Pakistan's Terrorism.
children; the terrorists have indulged wantonly in abduction, rape, murder, arson, extortion and looting. Government officials, political leaders and workers, members of judiciary, print and electronic presspersons, and prominent citizens have been threatened, attacked and killed. Religious "codes of conduct" have been imposed on common people, and there has been large scale destruction of public and private property including over 400 secular state schools.

I don't have to say anything. Do I?

Once you "indian army" leave then there will be no problem and peace will return.

They will one day, I am sure of that. Once the peace is established!
 
.
Dream on....the kashmiris are fightimg with the help of there fellow pakistani brothers.

Yup lots of them fighting since you kashmiris are too lazy to fight it out yourselves and lot of them are now busy shooting Pakistan in foot ...

You forget the vast amount of money that is being spent on the struggle comes from expat kashmiris as well as the pak govt.

Not even close .. Pakistani support is the bedrock of the entire movement ..
 
.
I believe you on face value but you said minority right?
Mirpuris are distinct from Kashmiris and akin to Punjabis..

Mirpuris share some cultural traits with punjabis but then they also share cultural traits with people from the valley.
Mirpur is where i would say punjab and kashmir merge.....
If you go to the north of kashmir there share cultural values with central asians....go to the south and they share values with northern indians.
 
. .
when are you going to answer mine?

when you will answer mine..

actually things are looking up now.

Great

Protect kashmiri's from themselves, you mean?

NO

not even to his own tribe, actually. he's more like a monster to his own tribe and the tribes around him.

to some he is a freedom fighter, refer to your definition.

Yes, that's right. you will hear what you want to hear, remember that.

I want Fleur Xavier to whisper sweetnothings to my ears never happened as yet... someone suggest Garda(wonder what that is?)

No, I shot you in the head. Kashmiri's were forced to vote by Indians against their will in the election. Besides that, there was a low turn out anyway. It's quite similar to Musharraf, a dictator, winning the elections a while ago, unopposed.

I think not.. statisitics are available.. go check them if you can't fight I will post them.

Had indians actually held a plebiscite, kashmir would have been a part of pakistan a long time ago. that's why holding an election is ideal for indians, they can terrorize the people into voting for india.

UN resolutions on plebiscite at the moment are uneforceable.
Elections are held so that Kashmiris can chose their govt from amongst Kashmiris.


that's rarely done, hundreds of women are raped at the hands of these soldiers. young girls are now being instructed to carry knives to gaurd their chastisy. You are actually saying it's okay for them, otherwise you would have argued against troops in kashmir.

I never heard of hundreds of women being raped, if such is the case they ought to carry guns... but IMO more women are picked by terrorists than soldiers..

At least I stand up for kashmiri's, so i feel their suffering and pain. One who wakes up and does not care for the affairs of the muslims is not one of us.

Okay.. where is your pain for Uighyurs? Broaden your horizon and feel the pain and suffering of all God's creatures.
Gandhi felt the pain of all...

You have been posting crap on a couple of threads, dealing from India as one nation since ancient times all the way to kashmiri's screaming to be a part of india even after they've been tortured by indians and killed.

You want to hear what your ears want to hear... rest is crap..

Everyone here knows, you're just a akhand bharat fanatic. You just want land, so that you can usurp that land in the name of hindu supremacy. you want estabilish your dominance from persia all the way to indonesia.

Akhand Bharata?
why just Asia, why not the world?

Soon, you will claim most kashmiri's are pandits and afghani's are indian. that's BS, azad kashmir is full with kashmiri's, mainly from the kashmir valley.

Dabong just said minority...

Northern areas is what you're talking about, they're not kashmiri.

I know...
 
.


Another very informative source from who else...... but a grand uncle from the Intelligence Bureau.....he must be telling the truth his in the Intelligence Bureau

The same loudspeakers which would call the Muslim faithful for namaz, then screamed – “Pandits, leave the valley; with the men, but without your women.” A grand uncle of mine, in the Intelligence Bureau and thus naturally on the hit list recalls the night they were at his doorstep, bellowing for blood

Your embarrassing yourself with these links.
 
.
The neutrality of this article is disputed.

Thats the first thing your "solid bit of proof" that pandits where told to leave there woman behind says.

Do i have to carry on down your post and rip it apart for the BS that it is or can i have a break in proving you wrong again.

"Again" can only be used if something has happened at least once.

You can do your own google and find hundreds of evidences for what I mentioned. If you have terrorist friends and relatives, you already know it is true first hand.

And how did you find such great usage of your worship place a laughing matter? Is that only to be expected as per you?
 
. .
They won't BE militants once they are PA soldiers.

Yeah they can claim whatever for political reasons. But my argument is that if we need to send fighters into Kashmir we should send Pak soldiers, not Pak civillians weilding a gun.

That would bring up the game several notches.

People joining these militant outfits are such a waste. They should join the PA and go fight in Kashmir through them.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom