What's new

Bangladesh's radical Muslims uniting behind Hefazat-e-Islam

CaPtAiN_pLaNeT

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
7,685
Reaction score
0
Bangladesh's radical Muslims uniting behind Hefazat-e-Islam
Government is wary of a movement led by Shah Ahmad Shafi that has gathered strength since its launch in 2010

Bangladesh's radical Muslims uniting behind Hefazat-e-Islam | World news | Guardian Weekly

Guardian Weekly, Tuesday 30 July 2013 13.59 BST

shah ahmad shafi

shah-ahmad-shafi-008.jpg


Bangladeshi police escort Hefazat-e-Islam leader Shah Ahmad Shafi from a madrasa in Dhaka on 6 May, a day after he instigated mass protests in the city. Photograph: Monirul Alam/Zuma Press/Corbis

Passersby cast wary looks at a bunch of men lurking outside the entrance to the Hathazari madrasa. They stand out, having neither beards nor traditional dress. Indeed, one of them has had the bright idea of wearing a flowered shirt. For the past few weeks the madrasa in Chittagong, central Bangladesh, has been under police surveillance. It houses 12,000 Qur'anic students, guided by Shah Ahmad Shafi, who heads Hefazat-e-Islam, the country's largest radical Islamic movement.

At his instigation over 500,000 demonstrators clogged the streets of Dhaka on 5 May, demanding the application of 13 measures, including a ban on mixing of men and women in public places, the removal of sculptures and demands for the former wording of the constitution to be reinstated, affirming "absolute trust and faith in Almighty Allah". About 50 people were killed in clashes with police and several leaders were arrested. Since then Hefazat has avoided the media, for fear of reprisals. The government is extremely wary of a movement that has steadily gathered strength since its launch three years ago.

We had to climb into a car with smoked-glass windows to enter the madrasa, where a cadre took us to the guide's office. Shafi, 93, only sees visitors after a long early-afternoon nap. He rarely speaks in public, less still to journalists. One of his proteges actually spoke to us, under his supervision, with so much fervour and devotion he might have been saying a prayer. Only once did Shafi raise his bushy white eyebrows, saying: "Above all, do not imagine we are interested in politics. Our aims are noble and exclusively religious."

Hefazat was formed in January 2010, in opposition to plans to give women the same rights of inheritance as men. It gained new recruits in April this year, after secular demonstrations in the capital. Thousands of people flocked to Shabhag Square, demanding the death sentence for the perpetrators of crimes during the war of independence, when they sought to maintain links between Pakistan and Bangladesh, then known as east Pakistan, the better to defend Islam.

But radical Muslims publicised the allegedly blasphemous statements of various bloggers, discrediting the Shabhag movement and regaining the initiative. "We shall fight till all 13 of our demands have been satisfied," promises one of Hefazat's general-secretaries.

Hefazat had previously kept a low profile. "It represents poor people, with little education, mainly country folk, who have always been despised by the urban middle classes. There is nothing transnational or terrorist about the movement, but it may become more radical if it is sidelined," says Farhad Mazar, a political commentator. Hefazat enjoys the support of millions of believers, thanks to the control it exerts over the vast majority of Qur'anic schools in Bangladesh. "Our schools train the best imams. About a quarter of them then leave for the Gulf states, the United Kingdom or the United States, and they support us financially," says Habib Ullah, the movement's deputy-general-secretary.

Hefazat has taken advantage of favourable circumstances to pull together a series of long-established political groups and organisations that have never before displayed such unity. Jamaat-e-Islami, its main rival at the head of a political party, has been undermined by the arrest of several of its leaders, on charges of war crimes.

The rise of Hefazat mirrors the declining secular ideology dating back to independence. Secularism served as a basis for Bangladeshi identity in 1971, when the country united to break away from the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, becoming one of the four basic principles enshrined in the constitution of 1972. But it has been disputed ever since. In 1977 the constitution was revised to assert "absolute trust and faith in Almighty Allah [as] the basis of all actions". Then in June 1988 a further constitutional amendment made Islam the state religion.

Islamism fills a gap in the political and ideological spectrum left vacant by the parties that coalesced around the independence movement, worn out by subsequent quarrels and scandals. "It is too soon to say that secularism is dead," says Ali Riaz, professor of politics and government at Illinois State University. "But the rise of Islamism, in the past 30 years, has influenced the political discourse and agenda, and to a certain extent social behaviour."

If this trend persists, it may hold back women's emancipation and fuel a sense of insecurity among religious and ethnic minorities. "The government has failed so far to protect these minorities," Riaz adds. In March hundreds of Hindu shrines and homes were burned down. This particular minority now accounts for less than 10% of the population, compared with 15.5% in 1975.

Hefazat is determined to influence the outcome of the election scheduled for early 2014, though it shuns direct involvement in politics, perceived as "impure". The ruling Awami League is in a difficult position, trapped between the Islamists and the opposition, which accuses it of confiscating power by refusing to form an interim government capable of organising a transparent election.

"The fact that [the Awami League] will not hear of an interim government may mean that it thinks it is going to lose. You may win without the support of the Islamists, but you cannot win against them," warns a Dhaka academic. Safe behind the walls of his madrasa, Shafi could well act as the kingmaker in the next election.

This article appeared in Guardian Weekly, which incorporates material from Le Monde
 
Every Slave of Allah should join this rally.

Don't troll yaar.

This is a serious issue & gives a lesson that crush extremists its not matter which religion they belongs. BD government should keep them under check because they are one of the main hurdle in BD progress.
 
Don't troll yaar.

This is a serious issue & gives a leeson that crush extremists its not matter which religion they belongs. BD government should keep them under check because they are one of the main hurdle in BD progress.

Now you are a dead man.....:D
 
Oh look who we have here, more Indians. Why do these Indians try to tell me otherwise, they interfere in things not relevant to them.
 
if the constitution holds Allah in its texts, then what happens to the 10-15% minorities? are they second class citizens? I am curious to hear that from the BD users of this forum.
 
if the constitution holds Allah in its texts, then what happens to the 10-15% minorities? are they second class citizens? I am curious to hear that from the BD users of this forum.

Nothing happens to them? That question was unnecessary. The country is based on secularism, all faiths live peacefully, Bismillahir Rahmanir Raheem and other things have been added to the constitution does not affect religious minorities.
 
if the constitution holds Allah in its texts, then what happens to the 10-15% minorities? are they second class citizens? I am curious to hear that from the BD users of this forum.

WHAT??If Western countries have 'God' in their constitution does it make people who do not say 'God' second class citizens?......What about atheists?Bangladesh is a secular state with a Muslim majority!
 
if the constitution holds Allah in its texts, then what happens to the 10-15% minorities? are they second class citizens? I am curious to hear that from the BD users of this forum.

so what about the name ' bangladesh' - eveyone isnt bengali here like tribes living in chittagong hill tract. what is your opinion on that?
 
It is Islam and Muslim majority population are under attack from secular and minority population under active sponsorship from across the border. Over last 5 years Awami League taken secular extermismto new height. Minority issue does not exists in Bangladesh and is an artificial creation to impose repressive rule on majority and supress them.
 
There is no such thing called 'radical'. Bagladesh secular forces is too aggressive, they killed 2500 protesters in a 'day' months ago and they'll do it again if protesters come out. Every Banglas should join and seek 'vengeance' :smokin:

Egypt is doing the same as secular govt's is bringing back Egypt to the days of Mubarak regime. Same as Mubarak but difference faces, get it?
Egypt government orders police to break up Muslim Brotherhood protest - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Bangladesh is a Muslim majority country but unfortunately all Muslim countries are ruled by secular govt's, it need to be crushed :butcher:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It is Islam and Muslim majority population are under attack from secular and minority population under active sponsorship from across the border. Over last 5 years Awami League taken secular extermismto new height. Minority issue does not exists in Bangladesh and is an artificial creation to impose repressive rule on majority and supress them.

I dnt know how saint can do this ??

2013 Bangladesh Anti-Hindu violence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rioters torch 12 Buddhist temples in Bangladesh | The Jakarta Post
 
It is Islam and Muslim majority population are under attack from secular and minority population under active sponsorship from across the border. Over last 5 years Awami League taken secular extermismto new height. Minority issue does not exists in Bangladesh and is an artificial creation to impose repressive rule on majority and supress them.

Bangladesh was born out of a genocide of its minorities.
 
Bangladesh was born out of a genocide of its minorities.

That is indian bs. Bangladesh born out of sprit of self detrmination while majority population faught for independence, minorities (with few exception) along with Awami League leadership went to indian comfort zone.
 
Back
Top Bottom