No wonder this pathetic excuse of a human being had to make the surrender. Pakistan should've made him the Army Chief after his brilliant performance."low lying land of low lying people'”
General A.K. Niazi
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No wonder this pathetic excuse of a human being had to make the surrender. Pakistan should've made him the Army Chief after his brilliant performance."low lying land of low lying people'”
General A.K. Niazi
There is nothing visable in that tape,heck one can't even eastablish identity of characters in Video,other then a Cow running between so called firing.Footage from USA media NBC news on killing of students near Dhaka University by Pakistani army during operation search light March 25, 1971.
Footage dedicated to the delusional Pakistanis who denied innocent civilians were killed by Pakistani army
Where did you get this gem from? By mid May whole Chittagong where out of Pakistani control. And there were Bangladeshi flags everywhere. Including my grandfathers' house. Indian Army landed intervened in Tangail. A town right next to Dhaka. How do you think this was possible? Because that area was controlled by Kaderia force.I sometimes pity on there Brains,during course of 8 Months,they failed to capture a piece of land,on which there flag could be raised
He wasn't made Army Chief.That happens when you bunk Histroy classes.No wonder this pathetic excuse of a human being had to make the surrender. Pakistan should've made him the Army Chief after his brilliant performance.
Did I say "He was made the army chief"?He wasn't made Army Chief.That happens when you bunk Histroy classes.
No,Actually by 1st of Aprail,mighty Bongos were imcharge of whole of East Pakistan,it was Niazi who was hiding in his house in Dhaka and Muktis were not able to capture him so Indian Army was called.Where did you get this gem from? By mid May whole Chittagong where out of Pakistani control. And there were Bangladeshi flags everywhere. Including my grandfathers' house. Indian Army landed intervened in Tangail. A town right next to Dhaka. How do you think this was possible? Because that area was controlled by Kaderia force.
By December Pakistani force only controlled Dhaka and even there, they were losing control.
Wonder where i was when i bunked English classes,in Dhaka along Niazi defending his house from Muktis.Did I say "He was made the army chief"?
You bunked too many English classes, it seems.
After putting down Mukti's PA's bulk of forces were in Border Areas.Dhaka was Defence less.Indian Army landed intervened in Tangail.
It was Tikka in 1st April. But he fled.No,Actually by 1st of Aprail,mighty Bongos were imcharge of whole of East Pakistan,it was Niazi who was hiding in his house in Dhaka and Muktis were not able to capture him so Indian Army was called.
I said Pakistan should have made Niazi the Army chief after 71. Did not say they actually did make him. You have serious comprehension issues.Wonder where i was when i bunked English classes,in Dhaka along Niazi defending his house from Muktis.
With respect , I have a question ,if nearly 3 lakh troops ( if more than two thirds of 4 lakh) were in East Pakistan that time ? Then how is it possible that captives were only 93000?More than two-third of those troops were brought in at 1971 to quell the civil movement.
Go ahead and read the two pages.After putting down Mukti's PA's bulk of forces were in Border Areas.Dhaka was Defence less.
As events unfolded in Bangladesh and the Pakistani Army began to face ever-increasing difficulties, some officers at GHQ began to have second thoughts about the existing operational plan to defend East Pakistan. General Abdul Hamid, COS of the Pakistani Army, approved of the existing deployment of troops close to the border[133] but Lt. General Gul Hassan, CGS, had little faith in the plan Lt. Gen. Niazi had outlined to him in June.[134] Gen. Hassan supposedly tried to get the plan revised several times and insisted on abandoning the concept of defending every inch of the province, wanted the Eastern Command to redeploy regular units away from the border, fight for the BoPs and strong points on a limited scale and ensure Dhaka Bowl had enough reserves instead of the gradual withdrawal of forces to Dhaka outlined in the existing plan.[135] However, GHQ Rawalpindi approved in October 1971 only with the following adjustments:[136]
These suggestions were incorporated in the plan without change. From September onwards Pakistani forces had begun to fortify positions with concrete bunkers, anti-tank ditches, land mines and barbed wires. Spiked bamboo was also used, and some areas were flooded to hinder enemy movements.[137] Engineering battalions were sent to construct fortified positions, although some of the strong points and fortresses (especially those inside the Dhaka outer-defense line) remained incomplete.
- Pakistani units to launch offensive action against English Bazar in West Bengal, if possible
- Commando action to destroy Farakka barrage should be considered
- Defense of Chittagong should be formed around one infantry battalion
- Dhaka to be defended at all costs
Well they would have used force because mukti bahni had infiltrated and started militancy so army had to respond...Army was not on some peace mission there, it is their duty to defend the country and if some Bengali people joined the militant movement definitely they would been harmed as a result of the counter-offensive. Now when so much is openly available Narendra Modi's open claims and Gen Manek Shaw claiming that he had been preparing for the military intervention for more than 8-9 months means they had already armed the mukti bahni a long long time ago. I used to be critical of PA on this issue but not anymore after learning the facts and figures and I know how strong the propaganda of the enemy is. Whenever there is a militancy, the state has to use force as a last resort. Do you remember that how Spain dealt with Catalonia in 2017 after a referendum for cessation...everything has been hushed up but still we know they used brute force, captured the leadership.Bro I never mentioned genocide or rape, what I'm talking about is the decision by west Pak authority to try and force the situation. They went for violence in an unwinnable, unjust scenario. And they did it out of pure arrogance, which is why it's worthy of remembrance by us and by you. Your politicians rightly cite 1971 as a case study of alienating regions.
Then why you guys are crying here?Why is this thread even alive? Bangladeshis need to show off to their master India that they are worth something. Okay, you guys got our soldiers in your country while teaming up with hindus, but what now? Every day your people get killed on Indian border, and none of you say shit. So what do you want from us Pakistanis? An apology? Any Pakistani that teams up with an Indian to make fun of you is disgraceful is my eyes. You people are no different from Indians, and thus we treat you that way. There are some Bangladeshis we respect, mostly the religious ones that you faggots try to hang. So I guess there is no longer a link there. Stop mentioning Pakistan, we honestly, stopped giving a **** the day you sided with India. Get over it.
You have your country India, and we have our nation Pakistan. The End.
Well they would have used force because mukti bahni had infiltrated and started militancy so army had to respond...Army was not on some peace mission there, it is their duty to defend the country and if some Bengali people joined the militant movement definitely they would been harmed as a result of the counter-offensive. Now when so much is openly available Narendra Modi's open claims and Gen Manek Shaw claiming that he had been preparing for the military intervention for more than 8-9 months means they had already armed the mukti bahni a long long time ago. I used to be critical of PA on this issue but not anymore after learning the facts and figures and I know how strong the propaganda of the enemy is. Whenever there is a militancy, the state has to use force as a last resort. Do you remember that how Spain dealt with Catalonia in 2017 after a referendum for cessation...everything has been hushed up but still we know they used brute force, captured the leadership.
Furthermore, don't take an idiot politicians too seriously, he is crying all sorts of things because he is about to be punished for his corruption...anything that comes of his filthy and foul mouth is nothing but lies.
Then why you guys are crying here?
We didn't even bring Pakistan here before Mr. @war&peace started talking sh!t starting from post 6
When we talk about 71, we don't always bring Pakistan unless you guys come here feeling some burn.
We have our country and you are happy with that.Do you assholes not have history before 1971? If you do then focus on that instead of trying to insult Pakistan in all of your shitty remembrance days.
With respect , I have a question ,if nearly 3 lakh troops ( if more than two thirds of 4 lakh) were in East Pakistan that time ? Then how is it possible that captives were only 93000?