What's new

Bangladesh overfishing: Almost all species pushed to brink. (Excuse me if this has already been post

Tom-tom

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 10, 2019
Messages
1,508
Reaction score
-4
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
https://www-bbc-co-uk.cdn.ampprojec...errer=https://www.google.com&amp_tf=From %1$s

Bangladesh overfishing: Almost all species pushed to brink
By Abul Kalam Azad & Charlotte PammentBBC Bengali
  • 16 April 2020
  • Asia
Share this with Email Share this with Facebook Share this with Twitter Share this with Whatsapp
Image copyrightKABIR UDDIN/GETTY IMAGES
_111719554_gettyimages-1209679112.jpg

Image captionFish are disappearing in the Bay of Bengal
Overfishing off the coast of Bangladesh is creating a "fishless" zone in one of the world's largest marine ecosystems, scientists are warning.

Most fish species are in decline, with some nearing extinction, a report on fish stocks in the Bay of Bengal says.

"Some seas in the world, like the Gulf of Thailand, have run out of fish," one of the authors of the report, Sayedur Rahman Chowdhury, told BBC Bengali.

"We don't want our Bay of Bengal to end up like that."

Hundreds of large vessels are overfishing at an unsustainable rate, monitors suggest. Local fishermen say the government is turning a blind eye as the trawlers target key fish species they rely on.

A resource running dry
Bangladesh is one of the most densely-populated countries on Earth, with its population crammed into a delta of rivers that empty into the Bay of Bengal.

At least 1.5m people in the country are dependent on fishing for their livelihoods and fish remains the most important source of animal protein for the population overall.

But a three-year report commissioned by the government shows the largest and most valuable species, like tiger prawns and Indian salmon, are almost completely gone.

_111717959_fishingfishermen.jpg

Image captionMillions rely on fishing for their livelihoods in Bangladesh
Jasim is a fisherman who's worked out of the port of Chittagong for 35 years. He says until a few years ago he only had to sail for a couple of hours to catch fish but now he and his colleagues travel for up to 20 hours before they find anything.

"There are many species of fish we used to catch before but we can't find nowadays," Jasim says.

He and the other artisanal, or small-scale, fishermen blame the scarcity on the presence of large trawlers in the bay.

Trawlers out of control
There are about 270 trawlers off the coast of Bangladesh, the biggest of which can catch up to 400 tonnes of fish each trip, 20 times the amount of the largest artisanal vessel.

"We are truly worried that if the fishing effort is not substantially reduced, we may lose this resource for generations to come," Mr Chowdhury says.

The fees the government receives from trawler licences are a small fraction of the profit made by the handful of companies which own the industrial fleet.

_111717960_fishingindustrialboat.jpg

Image captionIndustrial trawlers often come into conflict with local fishermen
These companies sell and trade fishing licences that were issued by the government years ago, making it difficult for the department of fisheries to control the amount of vessels operating.

New legislation that will give the department the power to cancel old licences is currently making its way through parliament.

But enforcement officers from the department are often taken to court by operators over their attempts to enforce existing regulation and risk being held personally liable if they lose.

A senior official at the Naval Trade Department, Captain Mohammad Giasuddin Ahmed, said no new licenses should be issued to trawlers until there is concrete information about stocks.

"If this carries on then our fishing ground will become fishless,'' he says.

With fish increasingly scarce, trawlers have begun targeting hilsa, a species crucial to the livelihoods of artisanal fishermen and the food security of Bangladesh.

A success story in jeopardy
The hilsa, a kind of herring and Bangladesh's national fish, is the only species showing some signs of recovery.

Image copyrightOQBA/GETTY IMAGES
_111719556_gettyimages-514925732.jpg

Image captionThe market for hilsa is worth £2bn
For several years now, the government has implemented a 22-day annual ban on hilsa fishing that takes effect every October.

The seasonal ban allows the hilsa time to migrate from the bay into river estuaries to spawn.

As compensation, the government gives artisanal fishermen a subsidy of around 44 pounds of rice per household not to fish.

But many say they struggle to feed their families and face financial ruin during this time.

_105894347_grey_line-nc.png

You might also like:

_105894347_grey_line-nc.png

When the government announced in May last year that it was adding a further 65-day ban for all fishing activity without the benefit of subsidies, hundreds of fishermen took to the streets to protest.

The bans have helped hilsa stocks recover but artisanal fishermen aren't the ones reaping the rewards, according to Mr Chowdhury.

"Although hilsa conservation affects millions of poor fishers, a large proportion of the benefit is going towards the industrial trawl operators who are catching thousands of tonnes of hilsa without providing much social benefit or revenue to the government," he says.

The hilsa recovery has also begun attracting "'super-trawlers" from abroad that are fitted with equipment to track and target the hilsa schools.

A new threat arrives
Super trawlers have double the capacity of existing industrial vessels.

Their size and engine power makes them quick enough to catch the fast-moving hilsa and they are fitted with sonar equipment to help them locate the shoals.

Four of these huge vessels arrived in Chittagong from abroad last year.

Bangladeshi operators bought the four super trawlers moored in the port and claim they have rights to use them to fish.

_111717962_seeviewandwind.jpg

Image captionSea View and Sea Wind were seen docked in Chittagong by the BBC
Two of the four vessels, Sea View and Sea Wind, originally of Thai origin, are subject to an Interpol notification for illegally fishing in Somalia.

International monitoring organisations OceanMind and the International Justice Mission (IJM) have been following the super trawlers since 2018 and confirmed, using satellite imagery, the presence of both vessels in Chittagong port.

Under international law Bangladesh must notify the government of Somalia about the presence of Sea View and Sea Wind in its waters.

When asked about the blacklisted vessels, Capt Giasuddin Ahmed said: "We are not aware of the presence of Sea View and Sea Wind vessels.

"They first entered Bangladesh with the excuse of repair work, but they were later expelled."

Image copyrightSATELLITE IMAGE ©2020 MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES
_111805077_imagewithcircle.jpg

Image captionSea View and Sea Wind, seen here circled in red, were traced using satellite imagery
The BBC approached the Bangladeshi government for comment and was told the fisheries department was closed because of the coronavirus outbreak and the minister was unable to respond.

But Mr Chowdhury is worried about the impact the super trawlers could have on fish stocks and the future of fisheries management in Bangladesh.

"These super trawlers are a threat to marine resources,'' he says.

"If such illegal vessels can enter Bangladeshi waters and get registered without any obstacles, then it could be suggested that Bangladesh has become a safe haven for blacklisted vessels."

_105894347_grey_line-nc.png

p052k87j.jpg

Video captionU Kauk Tin: 'Now this fish is becoming very rare.'

( Excuse me if this has already been posted )
 
. . . . .
Any ideas on whats going on with the bdmilitary site (DEFSECA)?

Could just be routine maintenance, but in my own experience wordpress (website platform that defseca use) is prone to random issues where sites often go down for days after incorrectly adding/updating plugins.

They could also be shifting hosters, Facebook group is here so you can use it in the meantime.
 
.
Bangladesh overfishing: Almost all species pushed to brink
Our human population is too large. They consume a lot of fish. So, the agriculture deptt must find out ways to increase the acreage of fish farming. I have seen virtually a hundred of ponds without economic activities.

I ask to impose pond tax on unused ponds. Taxation will cause the owners to start fish farming. In Japan, the local govts impose tax on unused lands in the municipalities. So, it forces the owners either to build apartment houses for rent or car parking.

This is how the owners earn and then pay taxes. Similar system may be introduced in water bodies in BD.
 
.
Humanity has passed the point of no return. Populations across the world have multiplied a thousand fold in just a few decades, they are stripping the earth bare of what evolution created over hundreds of millions of years.
Species of plants and animals have over those millions of years built complex interdependence. When you start knocking out vital cogs in that complex interconnected web, nature loses balance resulting in pandemics where viruses and bacteria enter the newly created spaces, where global warming results in changed weather patterns of heat and cold, drought and perpetual rain, famines and pestilence.
Societies have utterly failed to see that the world of very high child mortality has ended, and uncontrolled procreation in a world where few children die young will lead to mass extinction of all species.
 
.
I believe the article is full of mis-information and outright falsehoods. Blue economy in Bangladesh is nowhere near saturation, in fact it is very much in its infancy.

The writers are writing on behalf of either western tree-hugger enviro-Nazi alarmists (who have no purchase against fishing fleets in their own country even) or, some vested quarter that does not want to see deep sea fishing from Bangladesh (and exports) grow larger. I pay no heed to these idiots, they can't back up any of their claims.

Bangladesh right now has scarcely any capacity for deep-sea fishing, the deep sea trawlers equipped with freezer holds, and those that go on weekly trips number at most in several dozens. Indian, Sri-Lankan, Thai, even Myanmarese trawler fleets which fish in Bangladesh waters illegally are much, much larger - that number in the hundreds. If there is over-fishing, they are the ones that are to blame.

Enforcement by our Coast Guard has to be strengthened to catch foreign fish-poacher trawlers in Bangladesh waters, that much I agree. Patrols have to be stepped up and fines have to be raised, vessels have to be definitely impounded. Fish in the deep continental shelf area in coastal Bangladesh territory (such as the EEZ shown below) are varied and plentiful and this resource attracts all types of fish poachers. This cannot be allowed to continue.

territory_myanmar_bangladesh1.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
I believe the article is full of mis-information and outright falsehoods. Blue economy in Bangladesh is nowhere near saturation, in fact it is very much in its infancy.

The writers are writing on behalf of either western tree-hugger enviro-Nazi alarmists (who have no purchase against fishing fleets in their own country even) or, some vested quarter that does not want to see deep sea fishing from Bangladesh (and exports) grow larger. I pay no heed to these idiots, they can't back up any of their claims.

Bangladesh right now has scarcely any capacity for deep-sea fishing, the deep sea trawlers equipped with freezer holds, and those that go on weekly trips number at most in several dozens. Indian, Sri-Lankan, Thai, even Myanmarese trawler fleets which fish in Bangladesh waters illegally are much, much larger - that number in the hundreds. If there is over-fishing, they are the ones that are to blame.

Enforcement by our Coast Guard has to be strengthened to catch foreign fish-poacher trawlers in Bangladesh waters, that much I agree. Patrols have to be stepped up and fines have to be raised, vessels have to be definitely impounded. Fish in the deep continental shelf area in coastal Bangladesh territory (such as the EEZ shown below) are varied and plentiful and this resource attracts all types of fish poachers. This cannot be allowed to continue.

territory_myanmar_bangladesh1.jpg


I believe this article is relevant to what you are saying.

While India and its neigbours spar over Bay of Bengal borders, their fishers languish in jails

Dwindling fish numbers is forcing fisherfolk to cross the drawn-up Exclusive Economic Zones.

142044-hdlhlqdhsr-1590659432.jpg

Fishers in the Bay of Bengal. | Mohammad Arju/The Thrid Pole
Mohammad Arju

https://scroll.in/article/963165/wh...engal-borders-their-fishers-languish-in-jails

Bangladesh, India, and Myanmar have agreed on their borders in the Bay of Bengal, but neither fish nor fishers are bound by the lines on the Exclusive Economic Zone or EEZ map. In the hope of a better catch, fishers cross boundaries, knowingly or unknowingly. As more boats chase fewer fish, clashes are common.

Fishers based in Cox’s Bazar and Patuakhali fish harbours in Bangladesh say that, traditionally, they used to fish alongside vessels from other countries in the deep sea. Now, as it is becoming harder to find fish, foreign fishers are unwelcome competitors. Bangladeshi authorities have seized vessels from Sri Lanka and arrested the fishers. Sometimes the conflicts are dealt with more directly. The sinking of smaller vessels sometimes goes unreported, said several trawler skippers from Chittagong, Bangladesh,

Conservationists and fisheries managers warn that if countries fail to transform conflict into collaboration, there will be more at stake than the safety of the fishers. The number of fish in the bay will also dwindle.

With eight countries bordering the Bay of Bengal, around 200 million people live along its coasts. Most of them depend on the fish for their food and livelihood, and a majority of the fishers are below the poverty line. But the fisheries of the Bay of Bengal have been under pressure for decades and are now severely depleted. Hundreds of large vessels are overfishing at an unsustainable rate and local fishermen say authorities often turn a blind eye.

rjpemxlaly-1590657886.jpg

Credit: via The Third Pole
No cooperation
The failure of the Bay of Bengal countries to cooperate over fisheries and wildlife risks undermining many conservation measures taken at the national level, experts say.

There have been attempts to foster cooperation. India has the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation. The Global Environment Facility and United Nations Food and Agricultural Organisation set up a process to promote sustainable fishing among the eight countries, but not much has changed on the water.

Bangladeshi fishers view their government’s annual 65-day fishing ban as unjust, because they say fleets from neighbouring countries fish in Bangladesh’s waters during the ban. Officials say it is to protect spawning fish and rejuvenate fish stocks.

Mahatub Khan Badhon, a lecturer of Zoology at the University of Dhaka, said, “The perception of uneven enforcement of the marine fishing ban affects the compliance of fishers and encourages fishers to delegitimise any such management measures.” Badhon believes that ramping up enforcement is not the answer. Arresting and putting foreign fishers in jail, whether by Bangladesh, India or Myanmar, only increases human suffering. There is no evidence from past decades that it helps conservation or reduces conflicts over fishing.

Overfishing continues
While a large number of artisanal or small-scale fishers are locked up in foreign jails for months, overfishing continues in the bay. As Nur Islam Majhi from Chittagong put it, “There are always others who will cross boundaries with a hope that there are more fish in the sea.” As a skipper of an artisanal gillnetter, he has two decades of fishing experience and numerous encounters with boats from other countries just South of Mongla port in Bangladesh.

Last year, the Bangladesh coast guard arrested over 519 Indian fishers and seized 32 boats off the coast in Patuakhali – more than 125 km inside the Bangladesh EEZ. This was during the 65-day ban on marine fishing, which kept Bangladeshi fishers stuck on land.

The Indian fishers were sent back. But not everyone is so lucky. Statistics from the Bangladesh coast guard show that in recent years more than a thousand Indian fishers were held and spent months in jail before release. On the other hand, it is difficult to find the numbers of Bangladeshi fishers jailed in other countries. When Bangladeshi fishers are arrested in Myanmar, it can take years before they return home.

fpqestxbzr-1590658124.jpg

Fishers in Bangladesh’s Exclusive Economic Zone in the Bay of Bengal. Credit:Mohammad Arju/The Third Pole
Flouting international law
By jailing fishers, countries are not following norms set down by international law, experts say. Yugraj Singh Yadava, director of the intergovernmental organisation of the Bay of Bengal Programme, says that the international law of the sea clearly directs countries not to jail or deliver any other corporal punishment to foreign fishers arrested in EEZs. Headquartered in Chennai, the body is pushing for closer regional cooperation over sustainable fisheries among the Bay of Bengal countries.

Article 73 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea says: “arrested vessels and their crews shall be promptly released upon the posting of a reasonable bond or other security.” The law and subsequent international agreements also have provisions for bilateral agreements, information sharing and other sorts of collaboration to avoid the suffering of fishers and protect fish that travel across national maritime boundaries. Yadava said, “International laws provide enough guidance to States to deal with the issue. However, none of the countries in the region are doing so.”

Mohammed Latifur Rahman, director of Bangladesh’s marine fisheries office, agrees. There is no effective collaboration among countries except a few opportunities for dialogues, he said. He hoped that India, which has the longest coastline along the Bay of Bengal, could help neighbours conduct collaborative explorations and studies on joint fish stocks. “We need processes and mechanisms for data sharing and a functional platform to cooperate in marine fisheries management,” he said.

Back in 2012, a study commissioned by the United Nation’s Food and Agricultural Organisation’s Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystem project made several recommendations to deal with the arrest and repatriations of fishers, including joint patrols.

The Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystem Project is the only internationally-funded initiative to facilitate transboundary collaboration for marine fisheries and environmental issues. But more than one decade after its launch, very few of the recommendations have been accepted by the respective governments.

In the long run, countries will need bilateral or multilateral agreements for the repatriation of fishers. The roles of employers, vessel owners, and governments need to be clarified. Countries also need to regularly inform artisanal fishers of the issues involved.

Fish and borders
Many fish stocks regularly move between EEZs of two or more countries to feed or to spawn. Yadava explained that a few fish species like the Indian mackerel and the threadfin bream are distributed along the entire bay. Some other species like Hilsa and the Bombay duck are primarily found in specific areas. Smaller pelagic fish, such as anchovies, herrings and Hilsa, migrate through the coastal waters of two or more countries. Some small pelagic fish, like the rainbow sardine, are found along the coastlines of all the Bay of Bengal countries.

Even demersal species such as lobsters, sea cucumbers and reef fish disperse across boundaries during larval stages. For example, lobsters may travel thousands of km from their place of birth to the site of an adult settlement. “Harvesting activities of one country significantly affects the harvesting opportunities of other countries sharing the [same] resource,” Yadava said.

“No studies have been conducted yet to identify fish stocks straddling across multiple EEZs,” said Mohammad Sharif Uddin, principal scientific officer of Bangladesh’s Marine Fisheries Survey Management Unit. “During the last joint working group meeting with India there was no progress on fisheries.”

Threatened species
There may be some hope of this changing. Six Bay of Bengal countries have now joined the 1995 United Nations Fish Stocks Agreement. The most recent entrant was Thailand, which ratified the agreement in 2017. Myanmar and Malaysia have still not joined yet. The agreement is about implementing United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea provisions relating to the conservation and management of straddling and migratory fish stocks.

A significant part of managing fisheries is reducing bycatch and conserving highly threatened species of marine animals. Badhon explained that species of sharks, rays, and sawfish migrate across large swathes of sea. Migratory species such as whale sharks, hammerhead sharks and sea turtles often get caught in fishing gear along with commercially important fish.

Steps taken by one country to protect migratory species won’t have the desired results unless other countries in the region follow suit, Yadava explained. “Some of the countries protect these animals, but the scale of operation is not uniform. Without harmonised policy by all the countries in the region, conservation by one country alone may have limited benefits.”

The dugong inhabits the Palk Bay and the Gulf of Mannar, another transboundary area shared by India and Sri Lanka. The two countries are yet to agree on suitable strategies to protect this iconic species from threats from fishing operations.

Yadava added that active collaboration and joint management is essential if the fisheries of the Bay of Bengal are to be sustained. The countries are – in principle – not opposed, but as they drag their feet both the fish and fishers in the Bay of Bengal continue to suffer.

This article first appeared on The Third Pole.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
 
.
Our human population is too large. They consume a lot of fish. So, the agriculture deptt must find out ways to increase the acreage of fish farming. I have seen virtually a hundred of ponds without economic activities.

I ask to impose pond tax on unused ponds. Taxation will cause the owners to start fish farming. In Japan, the local govts impose tax on unused lands in the municipalities. So, it forces the owners either to build apartment houses for rent or car parking.

This is how the owners earn and then pay taxes. Similar system may be introduced in water bodies in BD.

I think if you read carefully it's fish in the sea, that are threatened from overfishing. Not fresh water fish. Unless I am mistaking it for another article.
 
.
I believe the article is full of mis-information and outright falsehoods. Blue economy in Bangladesh is nowhere near saturation, in fact it is very much in its infancy.

The writers are writing on behalf of either western tree-hugger enviro-Nazi alarmists (who have no purchase against fishing fleets in their own country even) or, some vested quarter that does not want to see deep sea fishing from Bangladesh (and exports) grow larger. I pay no heed to these idiots, they can't back up any of their claims.

Bangladesh right now has scarcely any capacity for deep-sea fishing, the deep sea trawlers equipped with freezer holds, and those that go on weekly trips number at most in several dozens. Indian, Sri-Lankan, Thai, even Myanmarese trawler fleets which fish in Bangladesh waters illegally are much, much larger - that number in the hundreds. If there is over-fishing, they are the ones that are to blame.

Enforcement by our Coast Guard has to be strengthened to catch foreign fish-poacher trawlers in Bangladesh waters, that much I agree. Patrols have to be stepped up and fines have to be raised, vessels have to be definitely impounded. Fish in the deep continental shelf area in coastal Bangladesh territory (such as the EEZ shown below) are varied and plentiful and this resource attracts all types of fish poachers. This cannot be allowed to continue.

territory_myanmar_bangladesh1.jpg

Your statements also proves to me that the bbc has anti bd element. I posted a thread while ago asking this very same question
 
.
Your statements also proves to me that the bbc has anti bd element. I posted a thread while ago asking this very same question

That's true without a shred of doubt, it's be known for some while now that BBC's South Asia unit peddles a certain narrative.

This narrative is extremely subtle and may go unnoticed but if you pay close attention and compare the articles where they address different countries, you can see what I mean. Some countries are shown in better light than others.
 
.
I believe the article is full of mis-information and outright falsehoods. Blue economy in Bangladesh is nowhere near saturation, in fact it is very much in its infancy.

The writers are writing on behalf of either western tree-hugger enviro-Nazi alarmists (who have no purchase against fishing fleets in their own country even) or, some vested quarter that does not want to see deep sea fishing from Bangladesh (and exports) grow larger. I pay no heed to these idiots, they can't back up any of their claims.

Bangladesh right now has scarcely any capacity for deep-sea fishing, the deep sea trawlers equipped with freezer holds, and those that go on weekly trips number at most in several dozens. Indian, Sri-Lankan, Thai, even Myanmarese trawler fleets which fish in Bangladesh waters illegally are much, much larger - that number in the hundreds. If there is over-fishing, they are the ones that are to blame.

Enforcement by our Coast Guard has to be strengthened to catch foreign fish-poacher trawlers in Bangladesh waters, that much I agree. Patrols have to be stepped up and fines have to be raised, vessels have to be definitely impounded. Fish in the deep continental shelf area in coastal Bangladesh territory (such as the EEZ shown below) are varied and plentiful and this resource attracts all types of fish poachers. This cannot be allowed to continue.

territory_myanmar_bangladesh1.jpg
I reckon you might be right. I see no mention of the Indian govt sponsored fishing trawlers that are regularly apprehended for fishing in territories of other countries
 
.
Heavy deep sea trawling is an urgent necessity for Bangladesh as it can provide a very cheap protein/mineral source to the poor population who are malnourished.

Heck, deploy a 100 purpose-built fully equipped trawlers in the Bay and we could even export billions of $ worth of fishes.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom