What's new

Bangladesh: No longer the 'hungry' man of South Asia

http://dawn.com/news/1051282/bangladesh-no-longer-the-hungry-man-of-south-asia

Bangladesh: No longer the 'hungry' man of South Asia
MURTAZA HAIDER
Published 2013-10-23 13:46:53

52678aecba206.jpg

In less than a quarter century, Bangladesh has outperformed Pakistan in reducing hunger and malnourishment. From trailing Pakistan in hunger reduction in 1990, Bangladesh has sped ahead of Pakistan and even India by halving hunger statistics.

The recently released Global Hunger Index(GHI) by the International Food Policy Research Institute reveals that hunger has improved globally since 1990. However, South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa are home to worst forms of hunger. Estimates by the Food and Agriculture Organisation in the US suggest that no fewer than 870 million people go hungry across the globe.

The pejorative reference to the starving, naked Bangalis (Bhookay, Nungay Bengali) is still part of the Pakistani lexicon. The West Pakistan’s establishment thought not much of Bangladesh when it separated after a bloody war that left hundreds of thousands of Bangladeshis and others dead. After the 1971 war, even Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto calledBangladeshis pigs. Fast forward to 2013 and a new picture emerges where Pakistan struggles to feed its people while Bangladesh gallops ahead in human development. One wonders why Pakistan, which was once thought to have so much promise, has become the sick (and hungry) man of South Asia.

526785a629046.png

Pakistan shows the least progress in reducing hunger amongst other South Asian countries. Source: Calculations and graph by Murtaza Haider, 2013. Data obtained from GHI, 2013.

The GHI tells the story of how countries have performed over the past two decades in fighting hunger and disease. The report reveals the early gains made by South Asia in the 1990s to fight hunger and malnutrition. It was the same time when sub-Saharan Africa trailed far behind South Asia in human development. However, since 2000 sub-Saharan Africa has picked up pace and in 2013 it has on average performed better on hunger than the countries in South Asia.

Despite the slow growth in South Asia, Bangladesh is one of the top 10 countries that have made the most progress in reducing hunger since 1990. The Bangladeshi success with reducing hunger deserves a closer look to determine if this has resulted from sound planning or is merely a result of happenstance. Given that Bangladesh has beaten not just Pakistan, but also India, Nepal, and Sri Lanka in the pace at which it reduced hunger, the success is likely a result of good planning and execution.

The GHI is computed as an average of three indicators, namely prevalence of undernourishment in the population, prevalence of underweight children under five years, and under-five mortality rate. The latest data reveals that compared to Pakistan, Bangladesh has lower prevalence of undernourishment in population and under-five mortality rate. However, Pakistan has slightly lower prevalence of underweight children under five years old.

526785a628f8f.png

Source: Graph by Murtaza Haider, 2013. Data obtained from GHI, 2013

Research in north-western Bangladesh suggests that hunger impacts are rather seasonal. During times of low crop yields, food prices rise and result in lower accessibility to sufficient nutrition. The researchers found that most food insecure are the perpetual poor. A combination of safety nets setup by the government and the use of micro-credit helps the poor to manage food supply during lean periods.

Apart from safety nets, the improvement in hunger reduction is a result of several commitments and policies. The budget document in Bangladesh contains a separate entry for nutrition. Article 15 of the Bangladeshi constitution expects the State to provide citizens with the basic necessities of life, including food. The Bangladeshi government in 2012 committed to food security “for all people of the country at all times.” The Bangladesh Integrated Nutrition Project (BINP) improved the nutritional outcomes as of 1995. Later in 2002, the National Nutrition Program was launched. Also included in the effort were Expanded Programme on Immunisation and vitamin A supplementation.

The above are some examples of how strategic planning resulted in faster reduction of hunger in Bangladesh. Despite the above-stated successes, 17 per cent of the population in Bangladesh (25 million) continue to suffer from hunger. In fact, 41 per cent of the under five children are likely to be stunted and another 16 per cent of under five children are likely to be ‘wasted.’ These numbers show that Bangladesh still has a long way to go in providing food security to its people.

Given that South Asian countries together now lag behind sub-Saharan Africa in hunger reduction, it may be prudent for South Asian heads of states to join hands in collaborative efforts to feed the hungry. They may want to learn from the best practices in Bangladesh and elsewhere to protect the food insecure amongst them.


Murtaza Haider, Ph.D. is the Associate Dean of research and graduate programs at the Ted Rogers School of Management at Ryerson University in Toronto.


india, Pakistan need Weapons of Mass Destruction not food for mass people. Bangladesh still has long way to go, only by good planning we can achieve this. Two things that I can't tolerate are street children and shelter less older people. We have to do something right away about them. No children should involve in anything but education. If they are on street, they have to be taken to a safe home where they will get food education. Similarly any older people on street has to be taken to old house where they'll get food, medical treatment.

It was Ershad administration who first declared that there would be no street children probably in 1988, these two ladies don't have thinking capability that will be a step ahead.
 
Well the small and an ethnic majority country with less population is quite easy to govern(BD, SL, Npl) than big, populous and multi ethnic ones(Ind, Pak).

Controlling a population more than 1 billion is hard...it's true but india has far lower dense population than Bangladesh and regarding Pakistan no argument will work, they had everything to progress...less dense population, natural resources and even economy, it's completely Pakistan govt. failure.
 
All those 150 Million are ethnic Bengali's unlike Pakistan which is home to several ethnic groups. In short Bangladesh & Pakistan have no comparison at all.

Having said all that it doesn't mean that Pakistani leaders had done their best in the past to pull Pakistanis out of crises...truth stays there - while world was progressing, Pakistani corrupt leaders were busy milking Pakistan & quadrupling their already looted wealth.:mad:

The corruption part is same in every country of subcontinent...just look at Transparency International index every year, Bangladesh, india, Pakistan are bhai bhai then :) .
 
The corruption part is same in every country of subcontinent...just look at Transparency International index every year, Bangladesh, india, Pakistan are bhai bhai then :) .

The corruption in Bangladesh & even India is not that intense as in Pakistan.

BTW Congrats to Bangladesh.:)
 
Bangladesh is way past India in corruption and I'm not talking about petty little Police bribes. India is ranked 94 while Bangladesh is ranked 144.
Could be true,could be false.who's to know what's what? These type of ranking are done by not neutral ppl,but its a subtle politrix .BD is still compared to India and Pakistan is way behind corruption. They are lucky their exposé to publicity is controlled. Where as we being the stupid race love to brag about our short coming as a nation.and having india as a FRENEAMY doesn't help either.
 
Could be true,could be false.who's to know what's what? These type of ranking are done by not neutral ppl,but its a subtle politrix .BD is still compared to India and Pakistan is way behind corruption. They are lucky their exposé to publicity is controlled. Where as we being the stupid race love to brag about our short coming as a nation.and having india as a FRENEAMY doesn't help either.


Bro, it may sound like I'm trying to degrade by country which isn't in my interest. But corruption is prevalent in Bangladeshi politics and higher ranking officials. The kidnapping of Ilyas Ali and the tit for tat between Shiekh Hasina, Khaleda Zia etc...So much corruption just going on there. I can go on forever but we both know the corruption of Bangladesh is dirty. I don't know what benefit 'Transparency International' will get out of putting Bangladesh higher ranking that India and Pakistan, I can guarantee there is no political motive behind this.
 
http://www.ti-bangladesh.org/index.php/trusteeboard

TIB Board of Trustees:

8SultanaK.jpg
Chairperson
Advocate Sultana Kamal
Executive Director
Ain-O-Salish Kendra
and Former Adviser
Caretaker Government
11SHossen.jpg
Secretary General
Ms. Selina Hossen
Writer & Litterateur
Executive Director, Faria Lara Foundation
2MahfuzA.jpg
Treasurer
Mr. Mahfuz Anam
Editor & Publisher
The Daily Star and
Publisher, The Daily Prothom Alo
10AAbuS.jpg
Member
Prof. Abdullah Abu Sayeed
President
Bishwo Shahityo Kendro
3HafizuddinK.jpg
Member
Mr. M. Hafizuddin Khan
Former Adviser
Caretaker Government
and Comptroller & Auditor General
4TawfiqueN.jpg
Member
Mr. Tawfique Nawaz
Senior Advocate
Bangladesh Supreme Court

7SRuhiG.jpg
Member
Syeda Ruhi Ghuznavi
Managing Director, Aranya
rokia%20afzal%20rahman.jpg

Member
Rokia Afzal Rahman
Former Advisor to the Caretaker Government &
Leading Entreprenuer

atmshamsulhuda.jpg

Member
A.T.M Shamsul Huda
Former Chief Election C


TIB is as political as these people are individually and as a group. Now people who know them personally or otherwise can provide more info.
 
True,in some extents. Have you heard about political lobbyist? India alone spends millions of dollars to uplift their nations face to the outside world.most of the European country's, UK,USA has special lobbyist from India in their midst.they are there for exactly what I am trying to say.our country is a small and poor one comparing to our two close neighbor. No matter how hard you try you can not compare with them regarding amount of money.Corruption in grass root level is a gift from shekh(snake) family.
 
Mia bhai,the list you have provided is a current one.Mix it with my one ,and you will get an idea about TIB.
No :1=AL
No :2=AL
No :3=AL through and through.
No :4=Majhe moddhe neutral,but by heart AL
No :5=DUI noukar maajhi,to be boro nouka ta AL
No :6=got into fighting in court figuratively for AL
No :7=husband big time AL
No :8=AL
No :9= Naaiba bollam.
So,now anybody with an ounce of brain can tell me that the ranking is not political stunts?
 
Back
Top Bottom