Bangladesh Economy: News & Updates

[kobiraaz]

Prevalence is 1% in adult population in BD, 0.3% in India.



That is not my question, the sexual preference of class stratified clientele. Again what are your views keeping in mind your HIV quip?



He is trolling I guess.

 

[TopCat]

Prevalence is 1% in adult population in BD, 0.3% in India.
.

I doubt that considering STD prevalance between India and Bangladesh.
Some NGO do inflate the numbers for getting funding. They had been saying 12000 HIV infected person for the last 2 decades. The number did not change yet. But actual number treated not more than few hundred.

 

[Nilgiri]

Yes you can make BD look quite good in illiteracy by posting absolute numbers.

Try understanding what PREVALENCE is next time. Thanks.

Prevalence is 1% in adult population in BD, 0.3% in India.

Where is your source? I dont think its that high in BD. It is less than India last I heard.

 

[kobiraaz]

You didnt read the article did you? This is all about using an integrated truck infra....not driver infra (since it would only take more time for drivers to have visas/permits etc). So it doesnt matter what the truck says or has on it.

You will see Jai Shree Ram trucks enter Dhaka too with this system.

I have read the post number 6 by riyad as well. You need to read again.

 

[Nilgiri]

I have read the post number 6 by riyad as well. You need to read again.

Fair enough. I doubt it will continue after this promotion.

 

[Hellfire]

Yes you can make BD look quite good in illiteracy by posting absolute numbers.

Try understanding what PREVALENCE is next time. Thanks.



Where is your source? I dont think its that high in BD. It is less than India last I heard.

BD.

http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2012/07/10/hiv-aids-bangladesh

http://www.unicef.org/bangladesh/HIV_AIDS(1).pdf

http://www.searo.who.int/bangladesh/areas/hiv_aids/en/


latest for india

http://naco.gov.in/NACO/Quick_Links/HIV_Data/

The latest data is not available off hand for BD. Should be below 1% .... they gave stratified data. Not cumulative prevalence as a national figure.

Prevalence: The number of new cases+number of old cases at that given time period/total number of people at risk in that given period.

It comes as a rate, per 100,000 as per CDC, Atlanta. For those who don't understand the concept of prevalence.

What are your views on international travel/tourism/business trips?? They are also a souce of spread of lots of diseases

Source: https://defence.pk/threads/india-re...-south-asia-trade.447726/page-2#ixzz4JSsHvJYg


Still waiting for that answer!!!

 

[Nilgiri]

BD.

http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2012/07/10/hiv-aids-bangladesh

http://www.unicef.org/bangladesh/HIV_AIDS(1).pdf

http://www.searo.who.int/bangladesh/areas/hiv_aids/en/


latest for india

http://naco.gov.in/NACO/Quick_Links/HIV_Data/

The latest data is not available off hand for BD. Should be below 1% .... they gave stratified data. Not cumulative prevalence as a national figure.

Prevalence: The number of new cases+number of old cases at that given time period/total number of people at risk in that given period.

It comes as a rate, per 100,000 as per CDC, Atlanta. For those who don't understand the concept of prevalence.

Hmm ok because here its given as 0.1% for BD:

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.DYN.AIDS.ZS?locations=BD

 

[Hellfire]

Hmm ok because here its given as 0.1% for BD:

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.DYN.AIDS.ZS?locations=BD

Yeah, conflicting data. That is why gave you three sources.

A case of under reporting due to social/religious stigma?

Ours is fairly well reported though. You will be hard pressed to find the latest data on BD at all.

 

[Nilgiri]

Yeah, conflicting data. That is why gave you three sources.

A case of under reporting due to social/religious stigma?

Ours is fairly well reported though. You will be hard pressed to find the latest data on BD at all.

I dunno, I meet a lot of BD data with much skepticism (as does the WHO for example)...and I get attacked for it a lot in this subforum heh.

Anyway I'll let the convo get back to the trucks now.

 

[TopCat]

Yeah, conflicting data. That is why gave you three sources.

A case of under reporting due to social/religious stigma?

Ours is fairly well reported though. You will be hard pressed to find the latest data on BD at all.

This is the most authentic data till 2008. The number suppose to go down by now.
Total HIV case is 1200, new AIDS close to 100 year.
Even thunderbolt kills far more people in Bangladesh.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2740703/figure/F1/

BD.

The latest data is not available off hand for BD. Should be below 1% .... they gave stratified data. Not cumulative prevalence as a national figure.

Still waiting for that answer!!!

Read it properly. below 1% (did not say how low) among key population group, means sex worker and injection drug user.

 

[Michael Corleone]

If only they got new techs instead of basing it on coal power. Like convert garbage methane and use that for electricity generation... It would have been far more environment friendly and far more efficient.

 

[bluesky]

You probably did not visit Purbachal by yourself. The soil is like Modhupur red soil and is very old unlike Dhaka's traditional swampy soil.

You did not send an area PLAN of the 142 storied structure. What is the total area of this structure? Is its floor area 300mx300m=90,000 sq.meter? Total vertical load, known as Dead Load (D.L) may be 500,000 ton for a tall building like this. The vertical load in this case becomes a staggering 5.5 t/m2. It is too big.

At least 17,000 piles are required to support an imposed vertical dead load of 500,000 ton. In this case load on the pile system is 29.4 t/pile. This load is alright for the friction piles with a length of about 30 m. However, it is impossible to place 17,000 piles in a SMALL 90,000 sq.meter space. So, the designer will reduce the pile number to, say, 10,000. Now, the load becomes a large 50 t/m2. Therefore, the vertical load cannot be sustained by friction piles.

I believe this structure is impossible to build without a bedrock at, say, (GL- 50m). Burj Khalifa is built on friction piles driven into a very very hard soil. Bangladesh lacks that kind of soil.

 

[TopCat]

You did not send an area PLAN of the 142 storied structure. What is the total area of this structure? Is its floor area 300mx300m=90,000 sq.meter? Total vertical load, known as Dead Load (D.L) may be 500,000 ton for a tall building. The vertical load in this case is a staggering 5.5 t/m2. It is too big.

At least 17,000 piles are required to support an imposed vertical dead load of 500,000 ton. In this case load on the pile system is 29.4 t/pile. This load is alright for the friction piles with a length of about 30 m. However, it is impossible to place 17,000 piles in a SMALL 90,000 sq.meter space.

So, I ask what is the actual project area in sq. meter? This is the reason I wanted you to send the area PLAN of the main complex that the KPC group will build. I believe this structure is impossible to build because there is no bedrock at, say, (GL- 50m). Burj Khalifa is built on friction piles driven into a very very hard soil. Bangladesh lacks that kind of soil.

Totla area of the project is 60 acre which will accommodate one stadium, one conventions center, few tall building including the 142 storyed one. I dont have any other details design which is irrelevant till now.
It will be a steel structure instead of RCC.

you should check with Shanghai soil which is nothing but a swamp.

For tall building managing lateral force is far more critical than vertical force.

 

[Major d1]

সব কিছু দিয়া দে। পরে ভিক্ষা করে খাবি।

 

[kaykay]

If only they got new techs instead of basing it on coal power. Like convert garbage methane and use that for electricity generation... It would have been far more environment friendly and far more efficient.

But that can't be done on a larger scale.....We have many such plants but they are smaller and less efficient. In short, that can't be alternative to this.