Why does pakistan have an army. Its a bankrupt begger nation that has never won a war. It has managed to lose significant proportion of its territory to a civilian uprising and willingly ceeded its sovereign territory to another country.
It is a major source of terrorism, gives shelter to terrorists and in return its population is indiscriminately bombed by the west.
Whats the point. They must give their defense to india even merge with indian union to form joint punjab.
Ouch .... Shahid ap ke dil pe bought zor se lagi hai baat.
Anyways are you Bangladeshi or Indian? Ethnically I mean...
Yes we are poor and beggar nation as you put it but we have our own challenges... 2 of our neighbours are our mortal enemy and third are also fanatics. We are fighting an enemy 7x our size and we have to maintain that army for our protection .
Where as Bangladesh has no such problem. Non of their neighbours are their enemies heck they don't even have enemy in the world .
So it is quite logical not to have defence forces. Bangladesh could become something like Scotland, a totally dependent country which is only connected to Britain for defence, monarchy and few other things. And so it saves them a lot of trouble.
You Bangladeshi are werid, you take any opinion so hard and you egos went sky rocketing .
Yes Pakistan has lost bangaldesh and Bangladeshi are ruling it. Its a sad thing, but still we never let India merge bangaldesh and Atleast bangaldesh become a sovereign nation .
But now there is no need for it .
India a far bigger economy can support your defence needs while you can become developed country by 2050 .
And people of bengal from both sides want this be it Hindu or Muslim .
Pakistani punjab doesn't consist of punjabis only, it has many ethnicities such as sirikis, potoharis, rajistanis and others.. And we have.no connection back to Indian punjab . Half of Indian punjabis don't even understand punjabi accents and they are all Sikhs.
So it's very illogical to say that.
PK will do far better within Indian territory..
Why?
What are your reasons for saying that?
Please elaborate ?
Look let me explain logically (usually it doesn't have any effect though)
Pakistan is a union and India is a union . Pakistan has 5 provinces .
Each province has Atleast 4 different major ethnicities. They are seperate provinces pre partition and they were merged after Pakistan was created which is very wrong step but we are in the process of making new provinces inshallah.
India has many ethnicities .
Pakistan has many ethnicities .
Only punjabi ethnicity is common with Indian punjab . Neither Sindh, nor balochistan, nor kpk, nor gilgit baltistan has any common nationality with Pakistan .
But bangaldesh has only one ethnicity.
And they are same with the Indian ethnicity.. Bangladeshi people love to shop in calcutta . Bangladeshi people love to watch Indian bengal channels . Even bangla people of different religion love each other .
Hindu bangla or Muslim bangla are same people.
Bangaldesh negates the 2 nation theory and form they nation on the base of ethnicity . How can they form an ethnic nation and not unite the bengal?
The dream of forming an ethnic bangla nation is not yet fulfilled.
India is too powerful to fight .
But you can unite under Indian Union, even can be autonomous under Indian Union.
The benefits are tremendous for you.
You can spend the money used on the defence on your people and become a developed country by 2050.
The creation of Bangladesh I repeat is on the basis of ethnicity and it is incomplete untill the both sides of bangal unite.
While Pakistani ethnicities have nothing common with Indian ones .
Hence there is no desire in people for merger or anything as exist between two sides of bengal .
