What's new

Bangladesh Army

My vote goes to SORA. Fully automated and in development for Serbian army by MTI (Military Technical Institute), and soon should enter Serbian Armed forces TTC (Technical Test Center). And everything done by MTI and tested in TTC is of high quality.


And believe it or not, director of MTI on this video is claiming that development of SORA costed Serbian army only 300 000 euros so far, but they got truck and D30J howitzer for free from the army. Some subsystems were probably developed for some other MTI projects, and then used in SORA. For example MTI devolped INS (Inertial Navigation System) is also used in new Serbian MLRS Morava.
BUT Soko 122mm offer batter protection, is it possible to change some modification as like add SAGEM Sigma 30, carry 40+ artilery shell on bord etc.
it will be very help full if you provide a details comparison................:rolleyes1:
 
BUT Soko 122mm offer batter protection, is it possible to change some modification as like add SAGEM Sigma 30, carry 40+ artilery shell on bord etc.
it will be very help full if you provide a details comparison................:rolleyes1:

SORA is already carrying 40 shells on board plus 6 shells in auto loader, while combat set of SOKO is 50+1 shells. SORA is fully operational with only two crew members, while SOKO needs four. SORA is equipped with fully automatic autoloader, while SOKO uses semi-automatic one. Rate of fire for SORA is 6 rds/min, and for SOKO is 4 rds/min with maximum rate of fire of 6 rds/min. And yes SOKO does have some ballistic protection, but that is STANAG level 1 protection, and that is not much. One of the reasons why SOKO has the rear part armored, is because two crew members are at the back. If you ask me the only thing i would change on SORA is making bullet proof cabin, with STANAG level 2 protection. SORA is using domestically developed and produced INS, but that doesn't mean that you can't use any other INS from the world market. One of the main requirements put in front of Military Technical Institute by Serbian armed forces, is to use as much as possible domestically developed and produced components, when making something for Serbian army.
 
Last edited:
Last Serbian national report on arms exports for 2013 claims, that Bangladesh ordered from Serbia equipment in worth of 44 822 480 $ in 2013, and Serbia delivered equipment in total worth of 26 790 255 $ in the same year.
 
10985231_1123267674357389_4038242182129112563_n.jpg



BD Army medical team helping in Nepal.

Last Serbian national report on arms exports for 2013 claims, that Bangladesh ordered from Serbia equipment in worth of 44 822 480 $ in 2013, and Serbia delivered equipment in total worth of 26 790 255 $ in the same year.

We have Serbian Nora B52 SPH, BOV M11. What else?
 
well it is just posted there i dont think we have them yet
 
:rolleyes1:
un official: bangladesh army testing 2 weapons system.
1) long rang sam system (s-300) type.
2) tacktial missile system, possible chines cruse misssile.
what the hell they will do with a long range Air defense system?? :crazy:Have they gone nuts?? :cuckoo::cuckoo:
All air defense duty should be on Air Force.Army should rather go after some low to medium SAM or Systems like Tangushka/TOR M1 to defend their installation/flanks from air attacks.
 
what the hell they will do with a long range Air defense system?? :crazy:Have they gone nuts?? :cuckoo::cuckoo:
All air defense duty should be on Air Force.Army should rather go after some low to medium SAM or Systems like Tangushka/TOR M1 to defend their installation/flanks from air attacks.

Padma and Jamuna Bridges are important installation. In future superior enemy fighter planes or missiles can blow these bridges. For example in 71 war freedom fighters had important tasks to blow all the bridges to limit movement of enemy..

Padma Bridge:
The two-level steel truss bridge will carry a four-lane highway on the upper level and a single track railway on a lower level. The project will include 6.15 km long[1] and 18.10 m wide bridge, 15.1 km of approach roads, toll plazas and service areas. Total 21KM or 21000 meters

Ly 60 SAM:
  • Length: 3.69 m
  • Diameter: 203 mm
  • Wingspan: 1 m
  • Weight: 220 kg
  • Warhead 33 kg
  • Speed: Mach 3
  • Maximum Flight Speed: 600 meters per second
  • Maximum maneuvering overload: 35 g
  • Maximum maneuvering overload [interception]: 7 g
  • Range(PL-10) AA : 60 km
  • Range (LY-60)
    • Normal: 30 meters - 12000 meters
    • Slant: 10 meters - 18000 meters
  • Guidance Semi-Active Radar Homing
If you are proposing for FM 90 SAM symstem thats another issue. But FM90 isnt regarded as a good system. They are setting up a cantonment around Padma Bridge also.
 
Padma and Jamuna Bridges are important installation. In future superior enemy fighter planes or missiles can blow these bridges. For example in 71 war freedom fighters had important tasks to blow all the bridges to limit movement of enemy..

Padma Bridge:
The two-level steel truss bridge will carry a four-lane highway on the upper level and a single track railway on a lower level. The project will include 6.15 km long[1] and 18.10 m wide bridge, 15.1 km of approach roads, toll plazas and service areas. Total 21KM or 21000 meters

Ly 60 SAM:
  • Length: 3.69 m
  • Diameter: 203 mm
  • Wingspan: 1 m
  • Weight: 220 kg
  • Warhead 33 kg
  • Speed: Mach 3
  • Maximum Flight Speed: 600 meters per second
  • Maximum maneuvering overload: 35 g
  • Maximum maneuvering overload [interception]: 7 g
  • Range(PL-10) AA : 60 km
  • Range (LY-60)
    • Normal: 30 meters - 12000 meters
    • Slant: 10 meters - 18000 meters
  • Guidance Semi-Active Radar Homing
If you are proposing for FM 90 SAM system thats another issue. But FM90 isnt regarded as a good system. They are setting up a cantonment around Padma Bridge also.
No bro,I wasn't exactly proposing FM 90,I was referring to masuds post about army testing s-300 like systems.

Padma bridge is a major installation,that's why deployment of sytsems like LY-60 is important,but you will need SHORAD systems like FM-90 too,well integrated diverse systems will increase the chance to kill.Army can have few battalions of LY-60,FM-90 for big installations like these,but for other purposes systems like Tangushka/TOR M1/PANTSIR is the best options for army.Highly mobile and very much effective.Can be deployed with the advancing flanks and provide air cover for army columns.Otherwise all long to medium area defense and SHORAD systems should be integrated under Air force,cuz in a war scenario they will be the main player in air war/defense theater.But whatever path you choose its a good integration of all systems,Training and operational readiness will matter the most.
 
No bro,I wasn't exactly proposing FM 90,I was referring to masuds post about army testing s-300 like systems.

Padma bridge is a major installation,that's why deployment of sytsems like LY-60 is important,but you will need SHORAD systems like FM-90 too,well integrated diverse systems will increase the chance to kill.Army can have few battalions of LY-60,FM-90 for big installations like these,but for other purposes systems like Tangushka/TOR M1/PANTSIR is the best options for army.Highly mobile and very much effective.Can be deployed with the advancing flanks and provide air cover for army columns.Otherwise all long to medium area defense and SHORAD systems should be integrated under Air force,cuz in a war scenario they will be the main player in air war/defense theater.But whatever path you choose its a good integration of all systems,Training and operational readiness will matter the most.

Sorry I couldnt grasp Masud's post under so much misspelling. Ahem
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom