What's new

Bangladesh: A Pawn or Strategic Player?

.
Seems like no Indian can resist seeing this vedic wet dream of trillions of illegal migrant in the land of milk and honey.

That was what killed the credibility of the writer. Unsubstantiated facts and wild claims.

Straight from the SanghChalak's official letterhead.

Shove back their BS where it came from.

Because we have proper government departments for conducting surveys, unlike the failure called BBS.

Proper Govt. departments with statistics like this

For paltry job of peon, 23 lakh candidates including 255 PhD holders ...
289096c700.jpg

iu

This state receives 25 lakh applications, including PhDs for peon, guard, other posts: Shocking!
peon-305_020217122224.jpg


Who are employed there because Bangladesh's quality of labour is low.

Don't make the false assertion that the quality of Bangladesh labor is lower than India.

Our labor in spite of lower wages has been more skilled and productive than Indian laborers, whether in agriculture (men), garments (women) or industry (mostly men). This has been proven in multiple studies by ILO and others.

Your labor is good for just one thing, joining unions.........

The fact that we tolerate Indian labor is because we don't have narrow minds like Indian RSSers.

Labor will go where it will, when there is a need.

And you talk as if there is a dearth of poor people in India??

You need visual proof?
 
. .
Who are employed there because Bangladesh's quality of labour is low. And millions of Bangladeshis send back just $6.6 billion, which shows the quality & skills of Bangladesh labour.
Do not you think that millions of poverty-stricken Indians cross the border to enter BD and work in the jobs vacated by our youth who leave for the middle east where pay is much higher? This is how India gets $4.5 billion remittance from BD.
 
.
Don't make the false assertion that the quality of Bangladesh labor is lower than India.

Correction, overall your labour even in FUTURE will be inferior to India's current labour.

Welcome to the non-BBS reality:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/whats-holding-back-bangladesh.474841/#post-9149084

Skills of Current Workforce:

BD: 2.18 (rank 130)
IND: 2.82 (104)



Skills of Future Workforce:

BD: 2.47 (rank 122) (Increase of 0.29) (LESS THAN 2.82 OF CURRENT INDIA)
IND: 3.67 (88) (Increase of 0.85)


Also worth adding for some more red-pilling:

r79Iz9w.jpg


http://www.un.org/en/ga/68/meetings/migration/pdf/International Migration 2013_Migrants by origin and destination.pdf

Its just a UN minimum estimate. Once SHW is settled in more and given more instructions, you will be force fed more of the reality, starting with Assam:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...9b3d759cfe7_story.html?utm_term=.ebb43d37a013

Our labor in spite of lower wages has been more skilled and productive than Indian laborers, whether in agriculture (men), garments (women) or industry (mostly men). This has been proven in multiple studies by ILO and others.

Of course its difficult for you to back up with any source, because the truth hurts:

Labour productivity -- ILO modeled estimates, Nov. 2016
t.gif


http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/oracle/webcenter/portalapp/pagehierarchy/Page3.jspx?MBI_ID=49&_afrLoop=164105486722444&_afrWindowMode=0&_afrWindowId=stvenntw7_1#!@@?_afrWindowId=stvenntw7_1&_afrLoop=164105486722444&MBI_ID=49&_afrWindowMode=0&_adf.ctrl-state=stvenntw7_33

Bangladesh:

2058 (2005 dollars output per worker)
8205 (2011 dollars output per worker)

India:

3962 (2005 dollars output per worker)
17462 (2011 dollars output per worker)

@LA se Karachi

Truth really hurts these fellows that they completely reverse it.
 
Last edited:
. .
Correction, overall your labour even in FUTURE will be inferior to India's current labour.

Welcome to the non-BBS reality:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/whats-holding-back-bangladesh.474841/#post-9149084

Skills of Current Workforce:

BD: 2.18 (rank 130)
IND: 2.82 (104)



Skills of Future Workforce:

BD: 2.47 (rank 122) (Increase of 0.29) (LESS THAN 2.82 OF CURRENT INDIA)
IND: 3.67 (88) (Increase of 0.85)


Also worth adding for some more red-pilling:

r79Iz9w.jpg


http://www.un.org/en/ga/68/meetings/migration/pdf/International Migration 2013_Migrants by origin and destination.pdf

Its just a UN minimum estimate. Once SHW is settled in more and given more instructions, you will be force fed more of the reality, starting with Assam:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...9b3d759cfe7_story.html?utm_term=.ebb43d37a013



Of course its difficult for you to back up with any source, because the truth hurts:

Labour productivity -- ILO modeled estimates, Nov. 2016
t.gif


http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/oracle/webcenter/portalapp/pagehierarchy/Page3.jspx?MBI_ID=49&_afrLoop=164105486722444&_afrWindowMode=0&_afrWindowId=stvenntw7_1#!@@?_afrWindowId=stvenntw7_1&_afrLoop=164105486722444&MBI_ID=49&_afrWindowMode=0&_adf.ctrl-state=stvenntw7_33

Bangladesh:

2058 (2005 dollars output per worker)
8205 (2011 dollars output per worker)

India:

3962 (2005 dollars output per worker)
17462 (2011 dollars output per worker)

@LA se Karachi

Truth really hurts these fellows that they completely reverse it.
Your cherry-picked reports have absolutely no meaning to me or to anyone here in the Bangladesh forum.☺

It is well known that you are trying to diss Bangladesh all the time by trolling and creating discord here.

No one invited you here and you are most welcome to leave. You have been banned multiple times yet you keep persisting. Just leave us alone.
 
.
Your cherry-picked reports have absolutely no meaning to me or to anyone here in the Bangladesh forum.☺

It is well known that you are trying to diss Bangladesh all the time by trolling and creating discord here.

No one invited you here and you are most welcome to leave. You have been banned multiple times yet you keep persisting. Just leave us alone.

Yes you cant argue with any evidence or reports, just your claims. So you get frustrated.

I especially like the ILO you referenced, and I just post the ILO data to silence you. Its really that easy.

My posts have much meaning to a number of BD members here, you dont speak for all of them....at best you talk for a few echo chamberists...thats it.

Just like you dont speak for @LA se Karachi when you labelled him a sanghi either. So grab some tissues on the way out.
 
. .
??????????????????????????????

Compare post 17 to 20.

World Economic Forum data (regarding labour quality) and ILO data (regarding productivity) given in just one of them.

Currently Indian workers are twice as productive as BD ones according to the ILO, that difference will only grow given WEF clearly reports that BD labour skill in future will still be worse than India labour current level.

Case closed.
 
.
Why does that matter. Bangladesh is a small country. It should focus on economic and social development like Switzerland rather than trying to enter power games like the Pakistani/jamaati lovers in Bangladesh want BD to.
 
. .
Yes you cant argue with any evidence or reports, just your claims. So you get frustrated.

I especially like the ILO you referenced, and I just post the ILO data to silence you. Its really that easy.

My posts have much meaning to a number of BD members here, you dont speak for all of them....at best you talk for a few echo chamberists...thats it.

Just like you dont speak for @LA se Karachi when you labelled him a sanghi either. So grab some tissues on the way out.

Why get all psyched up? No one cares.

Just leave......:lol:
 
.
BD is 8th largest nation in the world
You should use the word 'by population' in that sentence.

Because otherwise, the 'largest nation' implies size/area unequivocally. Which in turn implies resources.

And that in turn should answer your statement.
 
.
You should use the word 'by population' in that sentence.

Because otherwise, the 'largest nation' implies size/area unequivocally. Which in turn implies resources.

And that in turn should answer your statement.

I said nation not country.. That should had ended the argument.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom