Mighty Lion
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2018
- Messages
- 1,695
- Reaction score
- -11
- Country
- Location
No.Is Alan Warnes neutral?
Definitely not.
Even premier UK defence journalist Jon Lake does not consider Alan Warnes to be neutral.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No.Is Alan Warnes neutral?
Wrong.
I met with senior air assets managers (VP level) of LM and they denied having any info on either.
Not a single nuetral source has accepted PAFs narrative of Su-30.
No.
Definitely not.
Even premier UK defence journalist Jon Lake does not consider Alan Warnes to be neutral.
New Recruit
I am meet vice presidents and country heads of LM & Boeing every other week, I know very well what all data they received
All of those reports contacted "anonynoys" sources.just like some XYZ pentagon official not aware of a inventory count?....lol
‘Not aware': Pentagon on Pak F-16 count after Feb aerial dogfight with IAF
https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/news...after-feb-aerial-dogfight-with-iaf/ar-BBVFL8Z
but it did happen......
Did India Shoot Down a Pakistani Jet? U.S. Count Says No.
New Delhi and Islamabad had conflicting accounts of a February dogfight.
BY LARA SELIGMAN | APRIL 4, 2019, 7:50 PM
https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/04/04/did-india-shoot-down-a-pakistani-jet-u-s-count-says-no/
PS ....do you guys go to same shop to buy your pack of lies?...do you have buy one get one free offer?..
PS re-read again what i said.. no body has contested PAF claim. The americans have contest your F-16 claim... i hope u understand the difference...
First learn difference between linguistics and mobile typos.Kindly improve your linguistic skills a wee bit as you frequent such elite social circles.
Kindly improve your linguistic skills a wee bit as you frequent such elite social circles.
All of those reports contacted "anonynoys" sources.
Not a single officer came on record to say that.
Anyways topic is Su-30 false claim Not F-16
All of those reports contacted "anonynoys" sources.
Not a single officer came on record to say that.
New Recruit
First learn difference between linguistics and mobile typos
Indeed.My bad, I mistook them for 3 hardcore grammar mistakes in just 2 lines.
You spendtoo much timr with tea boys.i met a tea boy who bragged he met the regional head every day... claimed he was friendly with him and happy to him .. when he bought his tea
but never mind US policy... is
“As a matter of policy, the Department does not publicly comment on details of government-to-government agreements on end-use monitoring of US-origin defence articles.”
but for this lungi king they shared all the confidential details..
annonous sources?.
is that your reasoning? ....
New Recruit
Ok then yours are clear mistakes. Dont overdo yourself rapidly.You need to learn diff between mistakes when rapid typing on phone and grammar error
Indeed.
You need to learn diff between mistakes when rapid typing on phone and grammar error
You spendtoo much timr with tea boys.
Yes the fact they used anonymous sourves shows their credibilty.
that was epic ...i met a tea boy who bragged he met the regional head every day... claimed he was friendly with him and happy to him .. when he bought his tea
but never mind US policy... is
“As a matter of policy, the Department does not publicly comment on details of government-to-government agreements on end-use monitoring of US-origin defence articles.”
but for this lungi king they shared all the confidential details..
annonous sources?.
is that your reasoning? ....
love his radar / cloud theory on Pakistani radars...
yar Indian bari asani say Modi ka keh kar jan chura lety hain. k he is not technical person.It is: "Cheewala Theory of Electromagnetic Radiation"
yar Indian bari asani say Modi ka keh kar jan chura lety hain. k he is not technical person.
but b.c jo samny technical bethy thy woh andhy behry they. ...
koi to khoti da putar kehta ... yeh Tea stall nahi jahan clouds say Tea ziada biky ge.
that was epic ...