Australia:Stronger ties to India can reduce unhealthy dependency on China

[Ultima Thule]

We are building AMCA without anybody'd help. It is a true fifth generation plane and not a so called 5th generation plane.

and you're planning to build 5th gen they way ahead of you, they started 6th gen jet project
along with Russia, USA and EU @HariPrasad

Yes we are building. It will have much more weight carrying capability than 10 tons. We are building a mini vehicle which shall reduce launch cost to just 10% of our current cost which is already half anywhere else. We can launch 200 satellite (104 already launched) from only one vehicle and send our mission to mars in copybook manner which china can not do.

you're trying to build 10 ton space launch vehicle while they already have in the form of Long march-5 and developing super heavy launch vehicle like satrun V for their future manned moon shot named Long march-9
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_March_5
The Long March 9 (LM-9, CZ-9, or Changzheng 9, Chinese: 长征九号) is a Chinese super-heavy carrier rocket that is currently in study. It is planned for a maximum payload capacity of 140,000 kg[24] to LEO, 50,000 kg to Lunar Transfer Orbit or 44,000 kg to Mars.[25][23] Its first flight is expected in 2030 in preparation for a lunar landing sometime in the 2030s,[26] a sample return mission from Mars has been proposed as first major mission.[23] It has been stated that around 70% of the hardware and components needed for a test flight are currently undergoing testing, with the first engine test to occur by the end of 2018. The proposed design would be a three-staged rocket, with the initial core having a diameter of 10 meters and use a cluster of four engines. Multiple variants on the rocket have been proposed, CZ-9 being the largest with four liquid-fuel boosters with the aforementioned LEO payload capacity of 140,000 kg, CZ-9A having just two boosters and a LEO payload capacity of 100,000 kg, and finally CZ-9B having just the core stage and a LEO payload capacity of 50,000 kg.[20] If produced, it would be classified as a super heavy-lift launch vehicle along with the Falcon Heavy, the retired American Saturn V and Soviet Energia rockets, the Space Launch Systemand BFR currently under development in the United States, and the KRK[27]under development in Russia.

We have a FBR in operation since 1983. CHina only did that in 2013 i.e 30 years behind.

FBR is old tech for china Pebble bed reactor is more advance than of FBR @HariPrasad
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor

We are catching up very fast. We shall have better fighter planes, Better missiles (We already have) , better BMD (infact we already have), Space (We are ahead in majority of areas except putting human in space and lifting capability), We are ahead in nuclear technology in many critical areas (FBR, AHWR etc. Infact we are leading nation with Russia in FBR) , we are ahead in Pharmaceuticals and health care, we are ahead in education, China is ahead in electronics (Which will easily catchup), we are ahead in automobile (Though china produces more vehicles) , IT etc. In many area we are ahead but scale is low which will easily go up with time.

They had ABM better than you DN-2 & SC-19 ICBM killer with EKV (exaatmosphric kill vehicle) only two country have this tech USA & China which is more precise than you AAD and PAAD equipped with explosive warhead
HQ-19 Chinese equal to THAAD
HQ-26 equal to SM-3 and HQ-29 equal to PAC-3

FBR AHWR is old tech for China @HariPrasad

in IT they are top in the world,in Pharmaceuticals may weak, in healthcare i don't know where they stand @HariPrasad

And china remain idle in 2030 waiting for India to catch up, What lame logic you have @HariPrasad when India will reach China level in 2030, Chinese goes super power level along with USA, beating Russia and EU @HariPrasad

 

[IblinI]

and you're planning to build 5th gen they way ahead of you, they started 6th gen jet project
along with Russia, USA and EU @HariPrasad

you're trying to build 10 ton space launch vehicle while they already have in the form of Long march-5 and developing super heavy launch vehicle like satrun V for their future manned moon shot named Long march-9
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_March_5
The Long March 9 (LM-9, CZ-9, or Changzheng 9, Chinese: 长征九号) is a Chinese super-heavy carrier rocket that is currently in study. It is planned for a maximum payload capacity of 140,000 kg[24] to LEO, 50,000 kg to Lunar Transfer Orbit or 44,000 kg to Mars.[25][23] Its first flight is expected in 2030 in preparation for a lunar landing sometime in the 2030s,[26] a sample return mission from Mars has been proposed as first major mission.[23] It has been stated that around 70% of the hardware and components needed for a test flight are currently undergoing testing, with the first engine test to occur by the end of 2018. The proposed design would be a three-staged rocket, with the initial core having a diameter of 10 meters and use a cluster of four engines. Multiple variants on the rocket have been proposed, CZ-9 being the largest with four liquid-fuel boosters with the aforementioned LEO payload capacity of 140,000 kg, CZ-9A having just two boosters and a LEO payload capacity of 100,000 kg, and finally CZ-9B having just the core stage and a LEO payload capacity of 50,000 kg.[20] If produced, it would be classified as a super heavy-lift launch vehicle along with the Falcon Heavy, the retired American Saturn V and Soviet Energia rockets, the Space Launch Systemand BFR currently under development in the United States, and the KRK[27]under development in Russia.


FBR is old tech for china Pebble bed reactor is more advance than of FBR @HariPrasad
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor

They had ABM better than you DN-2 & SC-19 ICBM killer with EKV (exaatmosphric kill vehicle) only two country have this tech USA & China which is more precise than you AAD and PAAD equipped with explosive warhead
HQ-19 Chinese equal to THAAD
HQ-26 equal to SM-3 and HQ-29 equal to PAC-3

FBR AHWR is old tech for China @HariPrasad

in IT they are top in the world,in Pharmaceuticals may weak, in healthcare i don't know where they stand @HariPrasad

And china remain idle in 2030 waiting for India to catch up, What lame logic you have @HariPrasad when India will reach China level in 2030, Chinese goes super power level along with USA, beating Russia and EU @HariPrasad

This is not optimistic but absurd, but why would you like to wake someone from the other side, just enjoy the show.

 

[Ultima Thule]

This is not optimistic but absurd, but why would you like to wake someone from the other side, just enjoy the show.

Waking them for their wet dream, and facing them front of the mirrors And by the way they already becomes a superpowers in 2012 witout a toilets @YuChen

 

[Sam.]

We are building AMCA without anybody'd help. It is a true fifth generation plane and not a so called 5th generation plane.


Yes we are building. It will have much more weight carrying capability than 10 tons. We are building a mini vehicle which shall reduce launch cost to just 10% of our current cost which is already half anywhere else. We can launch 200 satellite (104 already launched) from only one vehicle and send our mission to mars in copybook manner which china can not do.


We have a FBR in operation since 1983. CHina only did that in 2013 i.e 30 years behind.



We are catching up very fast. We shall have better fighter planes, Better missiles (We already have) , better BMD (infact we already have), Space (We are ahead in majority of areas except putting human in space and lifting capability), We are ahead in nuclear technology in many critical areas (FBR, AHWR etc. Infact we are leading nation with Russia in FBR) , we are ahead in Pharmaceuticals and health care, we are ahead in education, China is ahead in electronics (Which will easily catchup), we are ahead in automobile (Though china produces more vehicles) , IT etc. In many area we are ahead but scale is low which will easily go up with time.



It is answered ahead. Please read.

Sorry to poke again but you are wrong in every possible way. We are behind China in every sector excluding few.

 

[HariPrasad]

and you're planning to build 5th gen they way ahead of you, they started 6th gen jet project
along with Russia, USA and EU @HariPrasad

you're trying to build 10 ton space launch vehicle while they already have in the form of Long march-5 and developing super heavy launch vehicle like satrun V for their future manned moon shot named Long march-9
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_March_5
The Long March 9 (LM-9, CZ-9, or Changzheng 9, Chinese: 长征九号) is a Chinese super-heavy carrier rocket that is currently in study. It is planned for a maximum payload capacity of 140,000 kg[24] to LEO, 50,000 kg to Lunar Transfer Orbit or 44,000 kg to Mars.[25][23] Its first flight is expected in 2030 in preparation for a lunar landing sometime in the 2030s,[26] a sample return mission from Mars has been proposed as first major mission.[23] It has been stated that around 70% of the hardware and components needed for a test flight are currently undergoing testing, with the first engine test to occur by the end of 2018. The proposed design would be a three-staged rocket, with the initial core having a diameter of 10 meters and use a cluster of four engines. Multiple variants on the rocket have been proposed, CZ-9 being the largest with four liquid-fuel boosters with the aforementioned LEO payload capacity of 140,000 kg, CZ-9A having just two boosters and a LEO payload capacity of 100,000 kg, and finally CZ-9B having just the core stage and a LEO payload capacity of 50,000 kg.[20] If produced, it would be classified as a super heavy-lift launch vehicle along with the Falcon Heavy, the retired American Saturn V and Soviet Energia rockets, the Space Launch Systemand BFR currently under development in the United States, and the KRK[27]under development in Russia.


FBR is old tech for china Pebble bed reactor is more advance than of FBR @HariPrasad
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor

They had ABM better than you DN-2 & SC-19 ICBM killer with EKV (exaatmosphric kill vehicle) only two country have this tech USA & China which is more precise than you AAD and PAAD equipped with explosive warhead
HQ-19 Chinese equal to THAAD
HQ-26 equal to SM-3 and HQ-29 equal to PAC-3

FBR AHWR is old tech for China @HariPrasad

in IT they are top in the world,in Pharmaceuticals may weak, in healthcare i don't know where they stand @HariPrasad

And china remain idle in 2030 waiting for India to catch up, What lame logic you have @HariPrasad when India will reach China level in 2030, Chinese goes super power level along with USA, beating Russia and EU @HariPrasad

Ok You are right. You win. I loose.

 

[newb3e]

That is true and we are already starting to make those moves, India is a democracy and does not try and influence other countries, like China, India does not bully smaller nations either.

hahahaha hahahahha hahahahaha hahahahah hahahhaa ahhahaha

india is such a great country!

 

[Ultima Thule]

Ok You are right. You win. I loose.

You're speechless/answer-less @HariPrasad

If you butthurt use this on your butts its a painkiller @HariPrasad

 

[HariPrasad]

You're speechless/answer-less @HariPrasad

If you butthurt use this on your butts its a painkiller @HariPrasad View attachment 488743

Is it made in Pakistan or Imported like potato and tomato?

 

[Ultima Thule]

Is it made in Pakistan or Imported like potato and tomato?

its a product of USA @HariPrasad we are not lier country like india is @HariPrasad and why you think China remains idle, waiting India to catch to China @HariPrasad that the main question @HariPrasad

 

[HariPrasad]

its a product of USA @HariPrasad we are not lier country

Ohhh That is fine. when you have to import even an anti burn cream, you are perfectly fit to judge which country has better rockets and Nuclear technology. I hail your privilege.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Ohhh That is fine. when you have to import even an anti burn cream, you are perfectly fit to judge which country has better rockets and Nuclear technology. I hail your privilege.

you're comparing burn cream with nuclear technology/rocket tech, that shows you you have a IQ level is far blow ) @HariPrasad

 

[HariPrasad]

you're comparing burn cream with nuclear technology/rocket tech, that shows you you have a IQ level is far blow ) @HariPrasad

You are unable to interprete a single sentence correctly and that shows your IQ.

 

[Ultima Thule]

You are unable to interprete a single sentence correctly and that shows your IQ.

Biggest importers of all kind of core tech (civilian and military) and you still consider India is way a head of China what a stupid/ lame justification you have @HariPrasad

Oh i forget India had become shupa dupa powa in 2012 @HariPrasad

Jai shupa dupa powa Hind since 2012 @HariPrasad

 

[Sam.]

Biggest importers of all kind of core tech (civilian and military) and you still consider India is way a head of China what a stupid/ lame justification you have @HariPrasad

Oh i forget India had become shupa dupa powa in 2012 @HariPrasad

Jai shupa dupa powa Hind since 2012 @HariPrasad

We are talking about more imports from Australia so they don't have to export more to China. You are very bright to drag the word "import" to taunt India while this thread is opened for the only reason "Australia want India to import more than China"

 

[Ultima Thule]

We are talking about more imports from Australia so they don't have to export more to China. You are very bright to drag the word "import" to taunt India while this thread is opened for the only reason "Australia want India to import more than China"

Then why your countryman @HariPrasad comparing that India is way way head in almost all fields with China @Sam. gives your advices to your countryman @HariPrasad to stick on topic @Sam.